|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 123
|
1. NEVER DO NON INTEGER ZOOMS
2. USE PIXEL ZOOM/POINT ZOOM Bilinear,bicubic,ect alter the image which you don't want cause it to blurred and therefored anti-aliased even the NON AA IMAGE!!!!. God how long this site been around for now ![]()
__________________
I come from planet viper days so don't call me noob. I own 2 nvidia cards and one ati card so don't call me biased. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Apple user. Deal with it.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,502
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,841
|
No, I think I read his translation he's trying to be rude. Its just hard to understand what he's being rude about. He'd probably do better not to come here if it upsets him so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Treehugger
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 942
|
Vambat...is that you?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
nV News Alumni
|
I KNEW my compressed Dawn shots would tick SOMEBODY off...
![]()
__________________
2010-2011 Reviews: GTX 570 | GTX 580 | GTS 450 | GTX 460 | GTX 465 Pre-2010 Reviews: 6600 GT | XMS 4400 DDR | SilenX Cooler | 6800 | 5900 XT | Personal Cinema | 5900 NU ______________________________________________ Phenom II x6 1090t @ 4.0 ghz | Asus M498TD-EVO Am3 SLI nForce 980a | 2x EVGA GTX 560 SLI | 2x4gb DDR3-1333 | Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU | 60gb Mushkin Calisto Enhanced Sandforce SSD | 2x WD2500KS RAID 0 | Sunbeam Tuniq 3 case | 24" Asus 19x10 LED LCD | 26" Panasonic 720p TV | Sidewinder X5 mouse | Logitech MX5500 & Revolution mouse | Altec Lansing 5.1 THX-Certified audio | Win 7 Ultimate | desk | couch |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
American
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Its me! Hurray!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brit in USA
Posts: 1,203
|
I agree with him. The technique by which you enlarge an image will affect how the aliasing will look. With the right plugin, you could even make the jaggies disappear entirely by enlarging the image with a fractal algorithm.
Doing a bilinear or bicubic resample will blur the enlarged image and make the jaggies look smoother and better than they actually are. You should to an integer pixel resize, a.k.a. "nearest neighbour" in photoshop. You need to be careful with this too, though. You must resize to an exact multiple of original image proportions e.g. 2x the size, 3x the size, 4x the size etc. If you do a nearest neighbour resize to something like 1.5x the original image size, then every other pixel will be twice as big as its neighbour. This would make the jaggies look worse than they actually are. I've also seen that photoshop 6 (dunno about later versions) is crap for enlarging images in this way, even with "nearest neighbour" resizing to exactly twice the original image size, it skips lines and adds others. This is why I only use Paintshop Pro when individual pixels matter.
__________________
Core2 Q9400 @ 3.0, eVGA GTX 260, 4G DDR 800, Vista64 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| $199.94 - FUJIFILM XP100 Black 14.4 MP 2.7" LCD 5X Optical Zoom Waterproof Shockproof | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 06-20-12 09:00 PM |
| Ideal 9700 review | pelly | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 19 | 09-07-02 03:00 PM |