Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > General Hardware

Newegg Daily Deals

Thread Tools
Old 09-25-02, 05:33 PM   #1
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 63
Send a message via AIM to Creole
Thumbs down Doh, M$ Optical Intellimouse Explorer not good for games

maaan, i wanted the corded version but I picked the cordless mouse and it doesn't react that good in games. It pretty damn cool though, didn't pay that much for it 4 so, daa well. I'm geeting my butt kicked in SOF2 and CS, this sucks. My logitech optical was better 4 gaming. A day after I ordered it, I read a review saying they didn't recommend it 4 gaming, don't you hate when that sh*t happens.
Creole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-02, 06:09 PM   #2
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 505


*points and laughs*

*pets Boomslang lovingly*
PCarr78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-02, 11:55 AM   #3
Team Rainbow
Smokey's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 2,273

I would never recommend a cordless mouse for gaming, just for the wieght alone. With two batteries I just dont like it, but yes that mouse sure is a nice looking mouse, go get the corded version
| Hiper Type R 580W PSU
| Intel Q9550 @ 4GHz | Gigabyte EP45 UD3R |4x 1024MB OCZ Reaper PC9200 DDR2 | Seagate 320GB/ Maxtor 320GB/ Maxtor 500GB HDD|Sapphire HD5850 | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Pro | Harmon Kardon AVR135 reciever | Jamo S718 speakers | 42" Plasma 720p (lounge room)-Samsung P2450H (bedroom)
Smokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-02, 12:36 PM   #4
Apple user. Deal with it.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,504

Don't just get the corded version, get the Special Edition of the Intellimouse Optical. It looks cool and has the best tracking of any optical mouse I've used. It's suhweeeet.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-02, 03:34 PM   #5
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Meriden, CT, USA
Posts: 4

Logitech's new MX series of mice are supposedly more responsive.
Go to there website and checkout the
MX700 cordless optical
MX500 corded version

Here's a review for the cordless MX700:

Review for corded MX500:

The specs on these look pretty good, but I can't give you any first hand experience with them because I don't have one...yet.
I may go out and buy(try) one out in a day or two.

Hope this helps!
-AthlonXP 1900+,
-2x256 Crucial DDR 2100
-WinXP Pro
-Dragon Ultra KT333
-Antec 1035B Case
-Antec TruePower 480w w/BlueLight
-AX-7 w/Enermax adjustable fan
-2000FP, 20.1" Dell LCD
-IBM 60g ATA100, Maxtor 60g ATA133
-Pioneer 106S 16x DVD-ROM
-Lite-On 16x burner
-MSI Geforce 4 Ti4600, 310/690
-On board LAN
-SB Audigy OEM
-ATI Firewire card
stephman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-02, 03:51 PM   #6
styles-T's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Smallville
Posts: 492

anybody know whats a good optical with a HIGH dpi..I had a boomslang and the control was great..I just hate ball mice now..
styles-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-02, 04:00 PM   #7
Unreal Tournament Gamer
Gator's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,279

optictal ownz ut, but ya cordless is definetly not a good diea, ur bound to lose a signal right at that key moment when ur fragging
Athlon64 3200 Clawhammer / Asus K8N-E Deluxe / 1GB Crucial DDR400 / Geforce 6600GT 128MB AGP / Windows XP Pro
Gator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-02, 03:27 AM   #8
john19055's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,864

I have never had any problems with my cordless Explorer Logitech 5 button but it is the one with the ball.I wanted to up grade to a better mouse but I bought the best cordless optical microsoft had to offer and took it back and tried the Logitech version,but in playing games I would always get slight pauses,like when I would stop and change directions and the slight pauses in a fast action game most of the time ment my quick death.Ever Optical I have tried all have these slight pauses,even though I thought Microsoft Explorer was the best out of the bunch, I return it and kept my old trusty cordless 5 button Logitech with the ball.
john19055 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-02, 07:45 AM   #9
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 505

Ball mice are good.

I like them

And i wouldn't replace my boomslang with anything, ever.
PCarr78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-02, 08:56 AM   #10
Registered User
SnakeEyes's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lake Zurich, IL
Posts: 502
Send a message via ICQ to SnakeEyes
Thumbs up

Based on my experiences:

The original Logitech cordless ball mouse 3 button scroller (the Egg): This was the only cordless mouse that I've ever been able to play UT with. At the time I had never used an optical mouse, so the only prior mice were corded ball-mice. This one was a wee bit slower on response than the corded models when I was using it, but not enough to bother me. One other issue, one that seems to plague Logitech mice in general, is that Logitech's drivers seem to have issues with allowing the scrollwheel to work properly in games. Worse, though the problem can be overcome, the solution varies from system to system, and at times, from one OS install to the next. One install might find the mouse wheel working perfectly, while the next requires changing some settings concerning MS Office Scrolling.., and the next actually requires a registry entry / killing EM_EXEC.EXE. This one has never gone away, with any Logitech driver that I've ever used. (4 years since I first saw it to the latest driver rev.)

MS Intellimouse Explorer Optical (corded): I bought this mouse as a replacement for the logitech cordless (above), when I started to get irritated at having to clean the mouse more and more frequently (once it gets unresponsive the first time, each successive cleaning seemed to be needed sooner and sooner..). The Explorer itself seemed fine, though extremely rapid movements caused the mouse to think it had only moved less than 1/2", and using it on solid / reflective surfaces or surfaces with repetitive patterns seemed to confuse it. The results of the these two observations along with the fixes that I've since been using (totally eliminating the issues) were that rapid 360's in UT were almost impossible, until I increased my mouse sensitivity in the game, but after that change the mouse no longer lost tracking, and 2)with the mentioned surfaces in use, I often found myself suddenly staring at the floor and/or doing a ballet pirhouette in the game as the mouse got 'confused', but changing the surface to a cloth pad with a nice MaxPayne image on it fixed that one for good. The biggest issue I had with this mouse, and the reason I returned it for exchange, was that it just was a bit too big, and definitely uncomfortable.

MS Intellimouse Optical: I exchanged the Explorer for this mouse, and even got a refund of a few $$. Interestingly enough, both are 5-button scrollers. It's just that the layout of buttons is a bit different (the non-Explorer model is more ambidextrous) and the Optical is a bit smaller. It was perfect for my needs, once I decided that I could live with only 4 buttons for in my games. Why only 4, since it had 5? Well, since the buttons are arranged in such a way as to make it equally useful to lefties as to righties, I found that the 5th button was usually hit by accident as I was doing some mad right-clicking in the game (UT Alt-Fire), and with ANYTHING bound to it, I normally didn't like the consequences. No biggie, though a 5th binding for stuff would've been nice. (To be fair, I had similar issues with the Explorer's 5th button, the larger of the two in the thumb area, mainly because I nearly always ended up clicking BOTH of those buttons any time I tried to click one of them.) I've owned 4 different Intellimouse Opticals so far, and all have been great. (BTW, the same issues listed for the Explorer, above, apply to all opticals I've tried so far. There's one exception coming up though..)

Logitech Cordless Optical: The main reason I originally bought the cordless logitech (above) was that I was getting tired of having a mouse cable wrap itself around the nearest available object and restrict my movement in games. Unfortunately, at the time I bought the Explorer (also above), there were no cordless mice that were also optical, and at the point I bought the Explorer, I judged the dirty ball issues (aka "I can't move." BLAM. You were killed by.. syndrome) to be a bigger nuisance than the sometimes tanglesome cord. With the announcement of the Logitech Cordless Optical, I watched stores carefully (FINALLY! A cordless AND an optical!!). Too bad the first thing I discovered once I got it home was that cordless and optical just don't mix at all. Why? The nifty power-saving modes that allow the mouse to have decent lifespans with a set of batteries also cause it to power down the LED almost the very instant you stop moving it, and then back up when you move again. The process IS NOT instantaneous though, and results in noticable unresponsive pauses during gaming. Worse, something about the combination of technologies more than doubles the mouse lag issue over the original logitech cordless. Interestingly enough, the both mice seem to lag worse with later Logitech drivers (making even the original cordless inadequate for gaming now, imo). Too bad, because the mouse was the most comfortable I've ever had. Still, it got returned within a few hours of my first use. For a while, I went back to my MS Intellimouse Optical.

Logitech Mouseman Dual Optical: Other than the problem with scrollwheels / games, the best mouse I've used yet. Has the ergonomics of the Logitech Cordless Optical, higher dpi sensor(s), 2 of those sensors and LEDs!! (w00t, no more rapid movements screwing up the mouse), and 4 buttons that all actually are placed in good locations so that I don't accidently smack em when playing. Life is good. Seriously, this mouse is currently my favorite, and I'd actually call it perfect if Logitech could ever get a clue and just make the drivers work (specifically meaning the scrollwheel stuff here- everything else DOES work). They should reverse engineer some MS Intellimouse software and figure out how to write the drivers properly. Because I get 3 buttons and a scrollwheel just using MS's generic drivers with this mouse. All I really need beyond that is access to the 4th button in the drivers, and if MS ever does Windows drivers with support for that, I'll ditch Logitech's altogether.

In any case, optical mice, so long as thet're not cordless, actually are more responsive than the ball-mice I've used, and have the added benefit of not getting dirty and causing loss of movement control in the middle of the big match. Accuracy is overall better than the ball-mice too. (I haven't used a Boomslang, though, and it could be even better, based on reports I've seen. But the shape would kill my hands..)
SnakeEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 01:18 AM   #11
Horus the pointy master
LORD-eX-Bu's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,609

Its time to replace my Logitech Marble. So I went to google gear and ordered the MS Intellimouse Optical(the new one, the ambidextruous one, I guess that is the special edition) and it shoul be here on monday. It is supposed to scan like 1500 times a second or something, anyways, its a corded one and I hope it works good.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=171&dateline=12152329  84
LORD-eX-Bu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 02:43 AM   #12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 505


Best. Mouse. Ever.


i cant believe you ppl like that optical crap.
PCarr78 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.