Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-04, 04:23 AM   #1
chimaera
Registered User
 
chimaera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default performance issues / fx5200

hi,

i have performance issues with my box. glxgars is giving me about 1/2 the fps (~750) others get with compareable hardware. also, counterstrike (steam/winex3.3) is pretty slow and this should run pretty flawlessly on my box.
i'm well aware of the fact that the 5200 is a low-end card, but like i told, others with the same card have doubled fps..

a short checklist:
- apic anabled
- mttr enabled
- agpgart anabled and loaded
- nvidia module loaded
- direct rendering active
- xf86config-4 in fine condition
- tried to enable/disable ht/smp

my system:
p4@2.4 / 800fsb / 512 mb / gf fx 5200 (passive) / debian/sid / linux 2.6.2 / latest nvidia driver / x @1280x1024/24bit
(i tried other drivers and kernels (2.4.x/2.6.x) as well, even knoppix shows the same results..)


any ideas? i would be thankful for any hint or a pointer in the right direction. if additional information is required, let me know.
__________________
'i wanna pull and shoot the nra, yeah, yeah, yeah!'
chimaera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-04, 09:07 AM   #2
dpw2atox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 170
Default

you could make sure you have fastwrites enabled as well as sideband addressing. not sure how much it will help but it may improve something. also make sure your card is set to AGP8x if your board supports it. finally try dropping it to 16bit color instead of 24bit. I have an FX5600 and its performs just under double at 16bit vs what I get at 24bit. i wish I could be of more help. if you are careful there is an overclock utility for linux called nvclock which you can use to overclock your 5200 a little bit. again be careful with the settings so you don't fry it.
dpw2atox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-04, 09:22 AM   #3
chimaera
Registered User
 
chimaera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default

thanks for the reply but i doubt it's on of the obove things:

- sideband addressing is not giving such a performance boost as well as 8x agp is not. this should be only noticable with huge(!) amounts of data like big textures even cutting edge games rarely use
- other compareable machines are running x with the same color-depth

it's not like i think, "mhh this card could like a little tweaking", for me it looks like a serious misconfiguration of my hw/sw.
even my 'old' ti4200 performs as it should. probably i just have a broken card..

on the other hand, i deleted wintendo some weeks ago, but iirc the card performed as it should unter ms's system. i just don't want to reinstall this os to verify
__________________
'i wanna pull and shoot the nra, yeah, yeah, yeah!'
chimaera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-04, 10:21 AM   #4
energyman76b
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Clausthal/Germany
Posts: 1,104
Default

Hi

--->- direct rendering active
PEEEP

remove that, that is completly wrong.
energyman76b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-04, 10:52 AM   #5
chimaera
Registered User
 
chimaera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default

?? dou you have information on this? every info i saw was telling that it has to look like this:
Code:
$ glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0  screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
server glx version string: 1.3
[..]
__________________
'i wanna pull and shoot the nra, yeah, yeah, yeah!'
chimaera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-04, 02:17 PM   #6
energyman76b
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Clausthal/Germany
Posts: 1,104
Default

Hi,

I thought you meant the kernel DRI/XF86Config dri-option, not the output of this tool...
energyman76b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-04, 12:32 AM   #7
Neutro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 19
Default

I just got a FX5200 and I'm also quite disappointed with the performance...
I only get about 25% more fps in glxgears (and Q3), with the exact same conditions and config, than my old GF2 MX400. Is that normal? I am unable to hit 125 fps, and rarely go above 80 fps in Quake3 in 1024x768, unless I tweak the engine to lower geometrical details.
Neutro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-04, 04:19 AM   #8
LoRd_CJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
Default

I reported this aswell a few days ago on this forum.
I too get bad performance with my FX5200 with the nvidia drivers in Linux. Performance is fine in windows.
I bet you notice it on video playback too don't you?
My MX 200 card brings me smoother and better video playback or by switching to the 2D nv driver.
LoRd_CJ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-01-04, 05:38 AM   #9
chimaera
Registered User
 
chimaera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default

i don't have issues with video playback, all videos run smooth and flawlessly.
__________________
'i wanna pull and shoot the nra, yeah, yeah, yeah!'
chimaera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-04, 08:23 AM   #10
Neutro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 19
Default

Ooops. I got an Asus V9520 ("Magic")... according to this thread, the videocard has a 64-bit bus instead of a 128-bit one, leading to a pathetic throughput. It offers performances slightly above a GF2 MX because of this. I'm returning this ASAP.
Neutro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-04, 01:47 AM   #11
slushee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 1
Send a message via ICQ to slushee
Default

New to the boards ..

I AS WELL dislike the preformance i'm getting with my 5200 F/X card in Windows XP. I am running 2 monitors out of it as well as a third with a PCI Herculese 32 Meg card.

I was wondering if we could get someone who likes thier speeds to post their settings as most of it means very little to me.

I wouldn't mind comparing my specs with a card that actually works well.
slushee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-04, 01:51 AM   #12
chimaera
Registered User
 
chimaera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8
Default

you might want to check [1]. it's a german board, but the table should be self-explaining as are the benchmarks.

[1] http://www.debianforum.de/wiki/?page=Grafik+Benchmark
__________________
'i wanna pull and shoot the nra, yeah, yeah, yeah!'
chimaera is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twinview performance issues on GTS250 hampsterblade NVIDIA Linux 4 05-30-12 11:53 AM
Boost Your Performance Goals 10x ' This Week on inside* Publications News Archived News Items 0 05-13-12 05:20 PM
NVIDIA Unleashes the GeForce GTX 670 Graphics Card ' Performance Perfected (WCCFTECH) News GeForce GTX 670 Reviews 0 05-10-12 08:40 AM
My UT2003 Tweak Guide DXnfiniteFX Gaming Central 48 10-30-02 11:59 PM
so let's try this again in the new forum - bad performance with correctly inst.driver neutrino NVIDIA Linux 11 08-01-02 04:19 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.