Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-17-04, 08:11 AM   #1
|JuiceZ|
Registered User
 
|JuiceZ|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Louisville
Posts: 3,286
Send a message via Skype™ to |JuiceZ|
Default ~ Official UT2004(retail) Benchmark Thread ~

Please post your benchmarking results using the *new* UMark to give those who haven't had a chance to grab a copy yet an idea of how the game will perform on their machines. I'm currently at work or else I'd post some of mine now.

FYI, this is for the retail version of UT2004.
__________________
primary MBP Core i5 2010 | HR | OCZ 120GB SSD
gaming Core i5-2500K @ 4.1GHz w/ CM Hyper212+ | MSI N560GTX-Ti TF II/OC | MSI P67A-GD55 | Silverstone FT02 | X360 250GB + Kinect
htpc IONITX-A-U | 2GB | M350 | XBMC Linux | SABnzbd, sickbeard, couchpotato | NAS Synology DS411J | 4TB
hometheater KURO PDP-5020 | Marantz SR6005 | Definitive BP7001s, CLR3000, BPVXPs
|JuiceZ| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-04, 10:39 AM   #2
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default

Here is mine

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	score.jpg
Views:	1249
Size:	21.3 KB
ID:	4913  
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-04, 08:02 AM   #3
Swiftdeathz
Registered User
 
Swiftdeathz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Default

videocard at 9800XT speed using 4.3 Catalyst drivers...

Map - Bots - Detail - Resolution - Min FPS - Avg FPS - Max FPS - Score
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BR-Anubis 12 High 1024x768 58.83 150.89 201.79 151.19
__________________
AthlonXP 2500+@2305 (200x11.5) | Epox 8RDA+ v1.0 | 1GB Twinmos PC3200 | Enermax 431w PSU | ATI Radeon 9800 Pro | Pioneer DVD-ROM | Liteon 32x12x40 CD-R/RW | WD 120gb/80gb 7200rpm 8mb cache | 20,406 3DMark 2001 | 6,550 3DMark 2003 | Folding@Home 24/7...

Last edited by Swiftdeathz; 03-18-04 at 08:16 AM.
Swiftdeathz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-04, 08:31 AM   #4
GamblerFEXonlin
polygons are fun!
 
GamblerFEXonlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 187
Send a message via ICQ to GamblerFEXonlin
Default

Hello!

Can you please run UT2004 map like Assault/convoy, and run it at

640x480 - high performance - NO AF/AA
1024x768 - high image quality - 4xAA/16xAF

and no background programs
GamblerFEXonlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-04, 03:02 PM   #5
bmg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 233
Default

Unfortunately the botmatch benchmark just sits in one spot for the entire run. Any ideas??
bmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-04, 07:37 PM   #6
metallinikil
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default

WAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!! I only get a score of 52 at 1024/768 4xaa 4xaf
very high detail.
metallinikil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-04, 08:20 PM   #7
GamblerFEXonlin
polygons are fun!
 
GamblerFEXonlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 187
Send a message via ICQ to GamblerFEXonlin
Default

metallinikil: what system do you have?
GamblerFEXonlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-04, 12:31 AM   #8
metallinikil
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default

Athlon XP 2000+
GF FX 5900 ultra (its actually 50mhz faster) EVGA
L7S7A2 mobo
512 ddr
metallinikil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-04, 07:35 AM   #9
GamblerFEXonlin
polygons are fun!
 
GamblerFEXonlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 187
Send a message via ICQ to GamblerFEXonlin
Question UT 2004 CPU or T&L?

texture/mip-map lowest
physics lowest
lod lowest
world detail lowest
640x480 no AA/AF

ut2004 demo assault/convoy
nforce2 barton 2100MHz: 45 FPS
nforce2 barton 2200MHz: 46 FPS


Its small but seem to be CPU, does this game use any T&L on the 3d card? Or vertex shaders for the characters animations (e.g. ass slap hehe)



Last edited by GamblerFEXonlin; 03-19-04 at 07:52 AM.
GamblerFEXonlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-04, 12:27 PM   #10
metallinikil
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default

T&L is recomended I think you dont notice too much of a drop because its on such a low setting and you have sucha fast cpu.
metallinikil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-04, 06:00 PM   #11
GamblerFEXonlin
polygons are fun!
 
GamblerFEXonlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 187
Send a message via ICQ to GamblerFEXonlin
Default

is that because the polycount isnt high enough to push the T&L on the 3d card but the CPU has more then enough to do (Net i/o and physics)?

Should I upgrade the CPU to get more fps at these settings? I wish for 120fps.
GamblerFEXonlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-04, 01:34 AM   #12
fallguy
 
fallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ^ Next to her
Posts: 155
Default

Its not very useful since it just sits there.. although, you can move and shoot yourself if you want..
fallguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official GeForce GTX 670 Review and Discussion Thread MikeC NVIDIA GeForce 600 Series 23 10-28-12 11:19 AM
Official nForce 2 Thread Matthyahuw CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 148 04-16-03 05:39 AM
Official Linux driver 1.0-3123 thread bammbamm808 NVIDIA Linux 126 12-05-02 07:21 PM
Official Grand Theft Auto 3 thread volt Gaming Central 6 08-01-02 08:04 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.