|
|
#13 | |
|
I like cheese.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 904
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
There used to be a signature here, but now there isnt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I like cheese.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 904
|
Ok, the store accepted the reason for return and are going to collect it from me when i arrange it.
Basically i need a new card now.... So i browsed through their site and saw, AOpen Aeolus FX5900-DV128. Now it was £140! And i was thinking.... whats the catch..... I took a quick look around the web and it seems to be a fully fledged 5900. It certainly mentions no where its an XT... the store did say "obsoleted product" (they have 50 in stock though) when it was going through the system. Maybe im lucky and bagged the few remaining 'real' 5900's. To that fact, the stores i bougth it has Aopen Aeolus 5900XT graphics cards for sale, with a completley different manufactuers code... its also about £7 more! :S I will wait and see when it comes, if its another 'dud' ill just return it and call it a failure - get a 5700ultra as cheap as i can. On the other hand if it does arrive and its 400/700 then i guess its not *too* bad as its like £40 less than i paid for the XFX... I will see. ![]() This is what im *supposed* to have ordered... http://english.aopen.com.tw/products...5900-DV128.htm
__________________
There used to be a signature here, but now there isnt. Last edited by RobHague; 01-30-04 at 10:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: I live in my chair in the UK
Posts: 440
|
There's a Gainward FX5900 at Komplett for £158, which looks like a 400/800 model if you Google it.
http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?a...rpID=1&cks=PRL (If that link doesn't work, just stick "FX5900" in the search box). Some other places have the same card for well over £200... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Unreal Tournament Gamer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,279
|
Quote:
__________________
Athlon64 3200 Clawhammer / Asus K8N-E Deluxe / 1GB Crucial DDR400 / Geforce 6600GT 128MB AGP / Windows XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Apple user. Deal with it.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,502
|
Even if you get yet another 5900SE/XT, there is absolutely no reason why you should return that and get the lesser 5700 Ultra. The 256-bit memory bus on the 5900 will make a world of difference, even though the SE has slightly lower clock speeds. I had a 5700 Ultra and a 5900 and the latter was superior in every way, shape and form, even in SE form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
I like cheese.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 904
|
Quote:
![]() But i will most likley keep it, as long as the card has decent cooling. ![]()
__________________
There used to be a signature here, but now there isnt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Mr. Extreme!
|
Quote:
My 5800ultra run at 590/1160 rock stable. Can the non reach those speeds?? ![]()
__________________
Notebook! ![]() Compaq Presario CQ60-215DX AMD 64 Athlon X2 @ 2GHz (QL62) 15.6 inch HD WideScreen Nvidia 8200M-G 895mb 2Gig system ram 250Gig SATA 5400rpm HDrive Vista Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
I like cheese.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 904
|
Quote:
hehehehe
__________________
There used to be a signature here, but now there isnt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 205
|
A 5800 of any variety will be faster than a 5700U. It has twice the fill-rate...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
nV News Alumni
|
at this point, I don't think that 5800 non-ultra's deserve at all to be ridiculed or called "bad deals"...
I think of them as vidcards that sit right between 5700U and 5900SE performance and sit right @ or under 5900SE price... Best execution of a 128 bit memory interface equipped card. Period. When 5800' sstart consistently hitting $150-$160, they will be scarfed up like Lardass' pies in Stand By Me... ![]()
__________________
2010-2011 Reviews: GTX 570 | GTX 580 | GTS 450 | GTX 460 | GTX 465 Pre-2010 Reviews: 6600 GT | XMS 4400 DDR | SilenX Cooler | 6800 | 5900 XT | Personal Cinema | 5900 NU ______________________________________________ Phenom II x6 1090t @ 4.0 ghz | Asus M498TD-EVO Am3 SLI nForce 980a | 2x EVGA GTX 560 SLI | 2x4gb DDR3-1333 | Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU | 60gb Mushkin Calisto Enhanced Sandforce SSD | 2x WD2500KS RAID 0 | Sunbeam Tuniq 3 case | 24" Asus 19x10 LED LCD | 26" Panasonic 720p TV | Sidewinder X5 mouse | Logitech MX5500 & Revolution mouse | Altec Lansing 5.1 THX-Certified audio | Win 7 Ultimate | desk | couch |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
No my 5900nu can't reach those speeds and doesn't have to because the 256 bit memory bus more than makes up for it. Although the 5900 is no slouch in the overclocking department either. I've said it before.. i'll take a wider memory bus over faster memory. This point was made very clear when the 5800Ultra went up against the 9700Pro a year ago and beat by the lower clocked 9700Pro. I do think for a 128 bit card the 5800 is a monster though and got a unusually bad wrap. Most of it because of the dustbuster sitting on it, which was loud. But Nvidia should have designed it with a 256 bit bus from the start. They had to clock the 5800 so high out of the box because they knew they would have to compete with the 9700Pro's 256 bit memory bus. Either way anybody looking to buy an Nvidia card now should go for a NV35 or up core. Last edited by green_meanie; 01-31-04 at 09:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 55
|
Well, in any case, you guys here are all on the right track with an nVidia card
. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|