~ Official UT2004 Benchmark Thread ~

|JuiceZ| · 03-17-04, 07:11 AM

Please post your benchmarking results using the *new* UMark to give those who haven't had a chance to grab a copy yet an idea of how the game will perform on their machines. I'm currently at work or else I'd post some of mine now.

FYI, this is for the retail version of UT2004.

jAkUp · 03-17-04, 09:39 AM

Here is mine

Swiftdeathz · 03-18-04, 07:02 AM

videocard at 9800XT speed using 4.3 Catalyst drivers...

Map - Bots - Detail - Resolution - Min FPS - Avg FPS - Max FPS - Score
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BR-Anubis 12 High 1024x768 58.83 150.89 201.79 151.19

GamblerFEXonlin · 03-18-04, 07:31 AM

Hello!

Can you please run UT2004 map like Assault/convoy, and run it at

640x480 - high performance - NO AF/AA
1024x768 - high image quality - 4xAA/16xAF

and no background programs

bmg · 03-18-04, 02:02 PM

Unfortunately the botmatch benchmark just sits in one spot for the entire run. Any ideas??

metallinikil · 03-18-04, 06:37 PM

WAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!

I only get a score of 52 at 1024/768 4xaa 4xaf
very high detail.

GamblerFEXonlin · 03-18-04, 07:20 PM

metallinikil: what system do you have?

metallinikil · 03-18-04, 11:31 PM

Athlon XP 2000+
GF FX 5900 ultra (its actually 50mhz faster) EVGA
L7S7A2 mobo
512 ddr

GamblerFEXonlin · 03-19-04, 06:35 AM

texture/mip-map lowest
physics lowest
lod lowest
world detail lowest
640x480 no AA/AF

ut2004 demo assault/convoy
nforce2 barton 2100MHz: 45 FPS
nforce2 barton 2200MHz: 46 FPS

Its small but seem to be CPU, does this game use any T&L on the 3d card? Or vertex shaders for the characters animations (e.g. ass slap hehe)

metallinikil · 03-19-04, 11:27 AM

T&L is recomended I think you dont notice too much of a drop because its on such a low setting and you have sucha fast cpu.

GamblerFEXonlin · 03-19-04, 05:00 PM

is that because the polycount isnt high enough to push the T&L on the 3d card but the CPU has more then enough to do (Net i/o and physics)?

Should I upgrade the CPU to get more fps at these settings? I wish for 120fps.

fallguy · 03-21-04, 12:34 AM

Its not very useful since it just sits there.. although, you can move and shoot yourself if you want..

03-17-04, 07:11 AM	#1
\|JuiceZ\| Registered User Join Date: Aug 1999 Location: Louisville, KY Posts: 3,285	~ Official UT2004(retail) Benchmark Thread ~ Please post your benchmarking results using the new UMark to give those who haven't had a chance to grab a copy yet an idea of how the game will perform on their machines. I'm currently at work or else I'd post some of mine now. FYI, this is for the retail version of UT2004. __________________ primary MBP Core i5 2010 \| HR \| OCZ 120GB SSD gaming Core i5-2500K @ 4.1GHz w/ CM Hyper212+ \| MSI N560GTX-Ti TF II/OC \| MSI P67A-GD55 \| Silverstone FT02 \| X360 250GB \| Kinect htpc IONITX-A-U \| 2GB \| M350 \| XBMC Linux \| SABnzbd, sickbeard, couchpotato \| NAS Synology DS411J \| 4TB hometheater KURO PDP-5020 \| HK AVR2600 \| Definitive BP2006TL(2) & CLR2300 \| Polk R50(2) \| Sony S470 \| HarmonyOne

03-17-04, 09:39 AM	#2
jAkUp eat. sleep. overclock. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Chino, California Posts: 17,744	Here is mine Attached Thumbnails __________________ 965xe \|\| evga x58 classified \|\| 3x evga gtx 480 \|\| 6gb g.skill \|\| win7 x64

03-18-04, 07:02 AM	#3
Swiftdeathz Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 13	videocard at 9800XT speed using 4.3 Catalyst drivers... Map - Bots - Detail - Resolution - Min FPS - Avg FPS - Max FPS - Score ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BR-Anubis 12 High 1024x768 58.83 150.89 201.79 151.19 __________________ AthlonXP 2500+@2305 (200x11.5) \| Epox 8RDA+ v1.0 \| 1GB Twinmos PC3200 \| Enermax 431w PSU \| ATI Radeon 9800 Pro \| Pioneer DVD-ROM \| Liteon 32x12x40 CD-R/RW \| WD 120gb/80gb 7200rpm 8mb cache \| 20,406 3DMark 2001 \| 6,550 3DMark 2003 \| Folding@Home 24/7... Last edited by Swiftdeathz; 03-18-04 at 07:16 AM.

03-19-04, 06:35 AM	#9
GamblerFEXonlin polygons are fun! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 187	UT 2004 CPU or T&L? texture/mip-map lowest physics lowest lod lowest world detail lowest 640x480 no AA/AF ut2004 demo assault/convoy nforce2 barton 2100MHz: 45 FPS nforce2 barton 2200MHz: 46 FPS Its small but seem to be CPU, does this game use any T&L on the 3d card? Or vertex shaders for the characters animations (e.g. ass slap hehe) Last edited by GamblerFEXonlin; 03-19-04 at 06:52 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Official GeForce GTX 670 Review and Discussion Thread	MikeC	NVIDIA GeForce 600 Series	23	10-28-12 10:19 AM
Official nForce 2 Thread	Matthyahuw	CPUs, Motherboards And Memory	148	04-16-03 04:39 AM
Official Linux driver 1.0-3123 thread	bammbamm808	NVIDIA Linux	126	12-05-02 06:21 PM
Official Grand Theft Auto 3 thread	volt	Gaming Central	6	08-01-02 07:04 AM

03-18-04, 07:31 AM	#4
GamblerFEXonlin polygons are fun! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 187	Hello! Can you please run UT2004 map like Assault/convoy, and run it at 640x480 - high performance - NO AF/AA 1024x768 - high image quality - 4xAA/16xAF and no background programs

03-18-04, 02:02 PM	#5
bmg Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Boise, Idaho Posts: 233	Unfortunately the botmatch benchmark just sits in one spot for the entire run. Any ideas??

03-18-04, 06:37 PM	#6
metallinikil Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 7	WAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!! I only get a score of 52 at 1024/768 4xaa 4xaf very high detail.

03-18-04, 07:20 PM	#7
GamblerFEXonlin polygons are fun! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 187	metallinikil: what system do you have?

03-18-04, 11:31 PM	#8
metallinikil Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 7	Athlon XP 2000+ GF FX 5900 ultra (its actually 50mhz faster) EVGA L7S7A2 mobo 512 ddr

03-19-04, 11:27 AM	#10
metallinikil Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 7	T&L is recomended I think you dont notice too much of a drop because its on such a low setting and you have sucha fast cpu.

03-19-04, 05:00 PM	#11
GamblerFEXonlin polygons are fun! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 187	is that because the polycount isnt high enough to push the T&L on the 3d card but the CPU has more then enough to do (Net i/o and physics)? Should I upgrade the CPU to get more fps at these settings? I wish for 120fps.

03-21-04, 12:34 AM	#12
fallguy Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ^ Next to her Posts: 155	Its not very useful since it just sits there.. although, you can move and shoot yourself if you want..