People should stop useless repetitions

[saturnotaku]

Originally Posted by Jethro

Agreed, i guess all these ATI fans are just really bored? got something to prove? it sure gets annoying. To bad u cant just kick em like u kick smacktards from your server for being wieners.

Just as bored as the NVIDIA fans no doubt. It's a two-way street.

[Jethro]

if your bored its your own fault, lifes what u make it bored or not its no excuse to purposely come into NVIDIOT forums preaching ATI.

[Pafet]

Well, Daneel does have a point... every third post contains either "it would be smart to wait for r420 before moving a muscle", and every forth has ".. a grain of salt..." in it .
But at least it's not boring

[stncttr908]

Originally Posted by Kain

Need a poll here.

Oh dear God no.

[LiquidX]

I kind of agree with him especially the Beyond3D bit.

[PsychoSy]

The best thing for our patrons to do is to ignore such drivel as much as they can, really. Don't count your critics; weigh 'em! We mods notice their drivel and make a mental note to watch them further. If they keep crapping threads with their preachy, repetive rhetoric, Mr. Flibble wastes no time waxing them SAS style prior to deposting their broken and bleeding carcass into the colon for excretion ...

[TheTaz]

Originally Posted by Daneel Olivaw

I'm kidding, I looked at your post history and I think you're just trying to make a joke.

Ayup.

Taz

[goofjb]

It is kind of funny when you read, "Look at that review." We have already read the review most likely or we wouldn't be here. It's interesting how many different views can be attainted from the same thing.

[vampireuk]

This is also in the wrong forum

[batterbrain101]

Originally Posted by saturnotaku

I think if people don't like what's going on they shouldn't stick around instead of starting a thread that sounds like a five-year-old's temper tantrum.

Here, here

[Daneel Olivaw]

All this has given me half a mind to start an XGI vs S3 thread!
*looks around for the monkey that stole the other half*

PS: about posting in nv cards, that was the best way to get both sides' fans to read the posts.

[legion88]

Originally Posted by goofjb

It is kind of funny when you read, "Look at that review." We have already read the review most likely or we wouldn't be here. It's interesting how many different views can be attainted from the same thing.

Yeah, but those different 'views' are motivated for more selfish reasons and often have little relevance to the review being discussed.

I remember a government agency counting inspections that were conducted by private companies as if they (government) were the ones doing it.

At first glance, it looks like somebody was trying to take credit for something they didn't do (i.e. the funky inspection accounting to make it appear that their division was doing a whole lot of work). But beefing up the # of inspections wasn't their real target. The # of inspections was used to calculate a compliance rate (i.e. the percentage of inspected people that followed that law). By including these private inspections with the government inspections, the compliance rate ended up being around 99+% every year.

With a compliance rate that high, there was no justification to hire new government inspectors to find the bad guys when almost everyone was law abiding, according to this accounting scheme.

The defense for this accounting scheme was allegedly the statutes. When the individual responsible was replaced, the funky accounting system was also replaced.

The individual continues to claim that his scheme was correct even though it is no longer being used.

The same attitudes exist for reviews. People will say things they know isn't true and then cite a review as allegedly supporting them. I remember one guy claimed that XYZ's review on the TNT2 showed it being "spanked" but in virtually all tests provided in that same review, it showed the TNT2 having the higher frame rates.