Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-10-05, 05:35 PM   #373
dvlk80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

I got 8711 with Foreware 71.84 and Ver 6.39 Chipset drivers..!!
__________________
Rig 1: Intel Q6600 + @ 3.37Ghz w/ Swiftech Water Cool | Asus P5K Deluxe/XP Pro SP2 | PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750 Quad Power Supply | 2 X BFG GeForce 7900GTX PCI-e @ 690/1750 (both Water Cool by Swiftech) | Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS | Klipsch THX 5.1 Speakers | 2 X 1024MB XMS2 Dominator 8500CLL | WD Raptor 150 GB and Seagate SATA 300 GB | DVD-RW PX-760A X 2 | Thermaltake Armor Black Case | Samsung 940B LCD


Rig 2:
Intel 2.8Ghz (Stock) | Asus P4C800-E Deluxe/XP Pro SP2 | BFG 500W Power Supply | Geforce FX 5200 | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy Platium | Sennheiser HD590 |
2 X 512MB Kingston Hyper X DDR 3200 | Maxtor 80 GB and 120 GB | Plextor CD-RW and Plextor 712A DVD-RW | Antec P1650 Black Case
dvlk80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-05, 08:41 PM   #374
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

8843 on dual 6800Gts@stock/AMD 64 4000+
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-05, 03:21 AM   #375
p3dj4
this is sparta
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

5619 with 7.5.9.0 driver
5486 with 7.1.8.4 driver
__________________
-=| ASUS P5Q-E |=--=| Q9550 @3.6 |=--=| THERMALRIGHT 120 ULTRA EXTREME |=--=| MUSHKIN HP2 6400 4GB 5-4-4-12 |=--=| SAPHHARE 4870 1GB |=--=| 2X SEAGATE BARRACUDA 500GB 32MB |=--=| CORSAIR 520HX MODULAR |=--=| THERMALTAKE V9 VJ 4000 |=-
p3dj4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-05, 09:21 PM   #376
ChrisRay
Registered User
 
ChrisRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 5,101
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

9,179 with the 76.10. other drivers give me a 100 point increase.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=661776
__________________
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.0 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLI|Monitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1080 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

Nzone
SLI Forum Administrator

NVIDIA User Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the members
ChrisRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 12:11 AM   #377
TheJingo
Teh Jingo
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

WTF 3dmark05=4667
3dmark03=10757
y is my score so low,
using forceware 71.25
what to do what to do guys, tell me pronto

3200+A64
NeoPlatinum
512x2 DDR400 Kingston
Leadtek A400 6800GT, 350/1000
TheJingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 11:50 AM   #378
Blacklash
8^9^3
 
Blacklash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Old Vizima
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJingo
WTF 3dmark05=4667
3dmark03=10757
y is my score so low,
using forceware 71.25
what to do what to do guys, tell me pronto

3200+A64
NeoPlatinum
512x2 DDR400 Kingston
Leadtek A400 6800GT, 350/1000
If you are using default driver settings, aka quality image settings and AA/AF set to application controlled those are accurate. Many boost their scores by turning AA/AF to off and setting the driver to high performance. Others also disconnect from the internet and kill all windows services but the absolute min.

If you look at reviews where stock Ultras were benched on the net at default settings. Aka quality driver image settings, and 3dmark05 applying 4xAF(AA/AF not defeated in the driver) then your score is again, accurate and actually sound. Don't use forum members numbers to judge your rig.

BTW there is also a very small group that use forceware drivers that allow you to null shaders and such outright cheats. They are easy to spot, like a 17k 3dmark03 with a stock 6800 GT.

Here's a stock GT reviewed, 3dmark03/05

http://www.************/read.php?page...mit=Go&cID=733

A slight OC could vastly improve your numbers, however if it is doing well in all the games you play I wouldn't sweat it.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB)
ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980|4604)|ASUS PA246Q
WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)|Pioneer DVR-2920Q|LG GH22LS30|Klipsch PM20 2.0
SilverStone OP1000-E|SilverStone TJ10-B|Thermalright U-120 Extreme|Win 7 HP x64
Blacklash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 11:55 AM   #379
Danhill
I hate the Cold
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 275
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

New highscore for me using the 71.84.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=665364
__________________
Mobo: ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,4Ghz Mem: 2 x 512 DDR 466, Vga: 2 x Club 3D 6600 GT in SLI, Hdd1: WD Raptor Hdd2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, Psu: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ
Danhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 12:11 PM   #380
Arachnid
Registered User
 
Arachnid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 265
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

3DMark03 - 7780
3DMark05 - 3201

Using 71.90s
P-IV 2.4Ghz
865GBF Mobo
XFX 6600GT AGP 128MB (501Mhz/1.0Ghz)
120Gb Seagate Barracuda
1GB DDR Hynix 266Mhz
Arachnid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-12-05, 09:15 PM   #381
Blacklash
8^9^3
 
Blacklash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Old Vizima
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

All tests done at clocks 460/1.10


Performance Driver Settings:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=669061

Texture/Mip/Filtering High Quality(entire test run)Edit:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=670785

Feature Tests
Fill Rate - Single-Texturing 3180.8 MTexels/s

Fill Rate - Multi-Texturing 7323.2 MTexels/s

Pixel Shader 134.6 fps

Vertex Shader - Simple 58.1 MVertices/s

Vertex Shader - Complex 42.5 MVertices/s



Batch Size Tests
8 Triangles 8.5 MTriangles/s

32 Triangles 33.1 MTriangles/s

128 Triangles 129.2 MTriangles/s

512 Triangles 151.3 MTriangles/s

2048 Triangles 152.4 MTriangles/s

32768 Triangles 152.4 MTriangles/s
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB)
ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980|4604)|ASUS PA246Q
WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)|Pioneer DVR-2920Q|LG GH22LS30|Klipsch PM20 2.0
SilverStone OP1000-E|SilverStone TJ10-B|Thermalright U-120 Extreme|Win 7 HP x64

Last edited by Blacklash; 03-12-05 at 11:31 PM.
Blacklash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 10:45 PM   #382
ChrisRay
Registered User
 
ChrisRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 5,101
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malficar
All tests done at clocks 460/1.10


Performance Driver Settings:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=669061

Texture/Mip/Filtering High Quality(entire test run):

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=670674

Feature Tests
Fill Rate - Single-Texturing 3174.0 MTexels/s

Fill Rate - Multi-Texturing 7319.5 MTexels/s

Pixel Shader 134.6 fps

Vertex Shader - Simple 55.8 MVertices/s

Vertex Shader - Complex 42.5 MVertices/s



Batch Size Tests
8 Triangles 8.5 MTriangles/s

32 Triangles 33.1 MTriangles/s

128 Triangles 129.2 MTriangles/s

512 Triangles 151.5 MTriangles/s

2048 Triangles 152.0 MTriangles/s

32768 Triangles 152.2 MTriangles/s
Thats a nice overclock for the X800XL, Completely stable?
__________________
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.0 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLI|Monitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1080 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

Nzone
SLI Forum Administrator

NVIDIA User Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the members
ChrisRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-05, 11:19 PM   #383
Blacklash
8^9^3
 
Blacklash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Old Vizima
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisRay
Thats a nice overclock for the X800XL, Completely stable?
Yes, it is stable and artifact free. I used ATi Tray Tools to test it extensively. Keep in mind it does not have the stock cooler, rather the VF-700 cu.

I am hoping I can figure out how to coax a little more out of it.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB)
ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980|4604)|ASUS PA246Q
WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)|Pioneer DVR-2920Q|LG GH22LS30|Klipsch PM20 2.0
SilverStone OP1000-E|SilverStone TJ10-B|Thermalright U-120 Extreme|Win 7 HP x64
Blacklash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-05, 01:06 AM   #384
TheJingo
Teh Jingo
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 27
Talking Re: Post your 3DMark05 benchmark results here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malficar
If you are using default driver settings, aka quality image settings and AA/AF set to application controlled those are accurate. Many boost their scores by turning AA/AF to off and setting the driver to high performance. Others also disconnect from the internet and kill all windows services but the absolute min.

If you look at reviews where stock Ultras were benched on the net at default settings. Aka quality driver image settings, and 3dmark05 applying 4xAF(AA/AF not defeated in the driver) then your score is again, accurate and actually sound. Don't use forum members numbers to judge your rig.

BTW there is also a very small group that use forceware drivers that allow you to null shaders and such outright cheats. They are easy to spot, like a 17k 3dmark03 with a stock 6800 GT.

Here's a stock GT reviewed, 3dmark03/05

http://www.************/read.php?page...mit=Go&cID=733

A slight OC could vastly improve your numbers, however if it is doing well in all the games you play I wouldn't sweat it.
what a relief , thanx alot friend, yes i,m on default settings, but is there any other easy tweaks to pump up the scores, i really want to hit 12k in 3d mark just for inner satisfaction, if u know what i mean.....
TheJingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Latest Tech And Game Headlines 0 05-28-12 08:00 PM
nForce2 "First Look" and fly-by benchmark GamblerFEXonlin Feedback Forum 4 10-01-02 07:48 PM
UT2003 Demo Benchmark info Gargr Gaming Central 28 09-21-02 07:48 PM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-30-02 11:02 PM
AMD 2400+ and 2600+ Benchmark Extrapolations savyj CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 2 08-17-02 09:32 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.