Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > CPUs, Motherboards And Memory

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-16-02, 12:30 PM   #1
savyj
Registered User
 
savyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 97
Default Can AMD take back the flagship crown prior to Hammer?

I was just looking at the Top 20 Webmasters for 3DMark2001 and noticed a few Athlon systems competing quite well running in the 2.0ghz range with P4's running in the 2.8ghz range. With 2.13ghz Athlon XP's on the way and the nForce2 claiming at least a 1% improvement over the KT333 is it feasible that AMD could temporarily regain the performance crown? Does anybody know if the new Athlons will be 333mhz FSB or is that slated for the 2800+?
savyj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-02, 07:53 PM   #2
-=DVS=-
.:. Lafiel .:.
 
-=DVS=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
Default

Woun't be easy Intel soon will ship new P4 prescot.. with 3GHz + with some high improvements like big super fast cash at 2Ghz also Hyper.... something tech from AMD


AMD better release Hammer faster
__________________
.:. Lian Li X500FX .:. i7 2600k .:. PNY GTX 680 .:. Corsair DDR3 8GB .:. Silverstone 800W PSU .:. Asus P8P67-M Pro .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
-=DVS=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-02, 07:55 PM   #3
-=DVS=-
.:. Lafiel .:.
 
-=DVS=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
Default

Hehe i forgot i already made a comment about new P4

Just two weeks ago Intel officially introduced the successor to the Pentium 4 under the codename Prescott. To be released in the second half of 2003, Prescott will be Intel's first 0.09-micron (90nm) CPU that will feature the following:

- Hyper-Threading technology
- Micro-architectural enhancements
- Additional L2 cache
- 800MHz FSB (200MHz Quad-Pumped)
- 90nm manufacturing process
- Close to 100,000,000 transistors


P4 Presccot ships in 2003 only
__________________
.:. Lian Li X500FX .:. i7 2600k .:. PNY GTX 680 .:. Corsair DDR3 8GB .:. Silverstone 800W PSU .:. Asus P8P67-M Pro .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
-=DVS=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-02, 08:26 PM   #4
netviper13
Treehugger
 
netviper13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 942
Default

And AMD's .09 micron CPU also ships in 2H of 2003, according to their roadmap.
netviper13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-02, 10:46 PM   #5
|JuiceZ|
Registered User
 
|JuiceZ|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Louisville
Posts: 3,286
Send a message via Skype™ to |JuiceZ|
Default

hmmmm....*rubs hand together* the future it starting to look very bright for cpu's
__________________
primary MBP Core i5 2010 | HR | OCZ 120GB SSD
gaming Core i5-2500K @ 4.1GHz w/ CM Hyper212+ | MSI N560GTX-Ti TF II/OC | MSI P67A-GD55 | Silverstone FT02 | X360 250GB + Kinect
htpc IONITX-A-U | 2GB | M350 | XBMC Linux | SABnzbd, sickbeard, couchpotato | NAS Synology DS411J | 4TB
hometheater KURO PDP-5020 | Marantz SR6005 | Definitive BP7001s, CLR3000, BPVXPs
|JuiceZ| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-02, 11:18 PM   #6
SavagePaladin
info*****
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,395
Default

The problem is when the CPUs get so cheap that selling them becomes a low profit business. what will AMD do then, I have to ask

Just a theoretical question, no need for attacks
SavagePaladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 12:52 AM   #7
Pakman
Registered User
 
Pakman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 22
Default

Short answer to the mans question: NO. And I am an AMD user too. It's just a fact that it is not going to happen. When the Hammer arrives though, look out Intel.
__________________
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
Pakman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 01:15 AM   #8
netviper13
Treehugger
 
netviper13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 942
Default

A 333 FSB 2800+ could take back the crown, but only very temporarily. It would certainly ensure AMD's safety until the release of Hammer though.

And according to the previews floating around, Opteron chips will be available yet this year, so we should get a fairly accurate picture of what the Athlon version of the K8 will bring.
netviper13 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-02, 04:23 AM   #9
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes, but by the time a 2800+ 333FSB Athlon gets out the door, Intel will likely have a 3GHz CPU out...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 02:42 PM   #10
savyj
Registered User
 
savyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 97
Default

DVS: My question is focused on the near future not 2003.

SavagePaladin: Well AMD's been selling their CPU's in this price range (perhaps even lower) for years, all the while eating at Intel's marketshare so I'm not too worried about that aspect of the market right now.

Pakman: Well, that's my question, I keep seeing people move on to the Intel platform (not me, I won't buy an Intel if there's an alternative, if for no other reason but to balance the market) but when I research the benchmarks it seems that the 2.53mhz P4 is only marginally ahead of the Athlon XP 2200+ (in fact still behind in a few benchmarks) and most of these have been HEAVILY optimized for the P4, something you're not gonna find in a lot of run of the mill software.

I would say that in "balanced" software (for lack of a better term, meaning software where the P4 was just behind the Athlon XP before the Northwood/533mhz FSB chips shipped), the Athlon XP 2400+ and 2600+ in an nForce2 could take back the lead. In the software where the 2.0ghz P4 at 400mhz fsb beats an Athlon XP 2200+, well we'll have to wait for the Hammer's SSE2 to take advantage of the optimizations being used for that software.

Another question: Has anyone found any decent comparison's between a P4/533mhz DDR system and a Athlon XP 2200+ KT333 system? I haven't been able to find one.
savyj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 08:57 PM   #11
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

here's a review http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q...ghbred-14.html. i'm not sure if they're using a KT333 or a KT266A. but since the performance difference is marginal at best(the KT333 performs 0-5% better than the KT266A) it is very indicative of performance.

SavagePaladin's point is that AMD is now producing high end CPUs, not just value parts like it did in the days of yore.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 09:06 PM   #12
savyj
Registered User
 
savyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 97
Default

Actually StealthHawk it appears that those comparisons are once again a P4 with RDRAM not DDR. Don't the P4 DDR systems peforming slightly lower than the P4 RDRAM systems?

And isn't/hasn't making CPU's been a low profit business for the last couple of years? Whether or not they've been building "high end CPU's" the profit margin has always averaged near the same for AMD (actually it's a bit better now, I think). Again, I don't think that's anything to worry about.
savyj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DOE Doles Out Cash to AMD, Whamcloud for Exascale Research News Archived News Items 0 07-12-12 07:50 PM
AMD Takes Graphics Crown with AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (AMD) News Archived News Items 0 06-22-12 03:50 AM
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: Give Me Back That Crown! (Tom's Hardware) News Archived News Items 0 06-22-12 03:00 AM
AMD Gooses the Clocks on 'Bulldozer' Opterons News Archived News Items 0 06-04-12 02:24 PM
Amd Hammer Delayed! LORD-eX-Bu CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 5 09-12-02 11:43 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.