Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Thread Tools
Old 10-15-04, 10:02 AM   #1
Graphicmaniac's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 533
Arrow Gaphs: DST vs no-DST & SM 3.0 vs SM 2.0 & full precision vs partial

Graphs that show difference between:

1) DST vs no-DST http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/1094/17.html

2) SM 3.0 vs SM 2.0 http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/1094/18.html

3) Full precision (32 bit) vs partial precison (32&16 bit) http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/1094/19.html

-The conclusions are:

1) There is an huge difference between scores with DST active where NV4x gpu gains around 10% points over a no-DST score.

2) SM 3.0 seems much less important because also if in the graphs the diffenrece between 3.0 and 2.0 seems huge we have to keep in mind that in 2.0 3dmark05 deactive the DST, so 90% of the loosed points are because of DST not active.

3) Full precision seems going from just slower to much slower depending on the situation; while nv30 suffer like hell using Full precision, nv4x shows to be much stronger and suffer much just in the pixel shader test.

Support GeForce FX owners againts the unfair business of ATI & Valve vote for this petition!!!
Graphicmaniac is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.