Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-08-04, 04:12 AM   #1
Nv40
Agent-Fx
 
Nv40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: everywhere
Posts: 2,216
Default am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

have been "playing" with 3dmark 2005 for some time..and while its very nice ,to my surprise is doesnt match the quality i have seen in Doom3..at times. when you compare it to Game1. while shadows are softer ,and levels have more polygons , im conviced that Doom3 could have done that scene which far better quality. there are quite some big level in DOom3 that completely surpass the quality of 3dmark05 game1 a still you get far better performance

game3 is the only one that really i liked .. even though there are games with better water .. still looks pretty nice the test. apart from the flickering shadows that happens no matter if you use DST or not.

at the moment have been impressed with Doom3 graphics more than any other game or benchmark this year ,Farcry comes second

after seein 3dmark05 ,im even more impressed today with D3 engine.
Nv40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-04, 04:43 AM   #2
BioHazZarD
USCM Marine
 
BioHazZarD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,369
Send a message via MSN to BioHazZarD
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

yeah because 3dmark is not a game only a benchark, i agree doom3 is much much better.
__________________
Chieftec Miditower /w 5 case fans | Corsair 620W HX PSU | Asus M4N98TD EVO SLI | AMD Athlon2 X2 260 3,2GHz | Corsair 3GB PC3-10666 | eVGA Geforce GTX 460 1GB (336shader) | Samsung Spinpoint x2 250GB HD +SATA 320GB | SB Audigy 4 @ 2.1 | Samsung Syncmaster BX2331 TFT 23" running 1920x1080@60hz | Windows XP PRO SP2 | |
BioHazZarD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-04, 06:19 AM   #3
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Well i think it might be true only to some aspects .

the GT1 has larger draw distance & better particle effects all over the scene .
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-04, 02:43 PM   #4
DaveW
Its me! Hurray!
 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brit in USA
Posts: 1,203
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

I think Doom 3 is better because it doesn't artifact all over the place, unlike 3DMark 2005
__________________

Core2 Q9400 @ 3.0, eVGA GTX 260, 4G DDR 800, Vista64
DaveW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-04, 02:56 PM   #5
Ninjaman09
Takin 'er easy
 
Ninjaman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jowjah
Posts: 6,687
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveW
I think Doom 3 is better because it doesn't artifact all over the place, unlike 3DMark 2005
No kidding, I couldn't stand that. It's ridiculous. That's with everything at stock, too.
__________________
Core i7 920 @ 3.2 | ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
6GB Mushkin DDR3-1600 RAM
eVGA GTX 570 SC | Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1
CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX
Dell U2410
Ninjaman09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-04, 04:05 PM   #6
Kojiro
Registered User
 
Kojiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

I don't get artifacts in 3dmark 05.

3Dmark mark cinemas are better looking than those gay tech demos that nvida have.

I love ATI's Ruby demo.

I play Doom 3 all the time at 1200X1024 at High qality with 4x AA.

I say that all of you guys should get your eyes checked, 3dmark 05 is what could only be done in pre rendered layers, like how they make 3d movies like Shrek and Finding Nemo, a couple of years back. Now hardware is power full enough to do it in real time. That is very impresive if you know what real time is.
Kojiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-04, 06:43 PM   #7
GamerGuyX
 
GamerGuyX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kentwood, Michigan
Posts: 4,200
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kojiro
That is very impresive if you know what real time is.
We would have to be idiots to not know what "real time" is.
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="4"]People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people. -[B] V[/B][/SIZE][/COLOR]


[url="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/user_list.php?s=&t=35216"]Folding for Team# 35216 : NvNews + OSNN + SP[/URL]
GamerGuyX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-04, 06:59 PM   #8
saturnotaku
Apple user. Deal with it.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,502
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

3DMark 05 - real time graphics straight out of a cat's a** hole.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-19-04, 08:09 PM   #9
aaahhh52
gahboo?
 
aaahhh52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 987
Send a message via AIM to aaahhh52
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saturnotaku
3DMark 05 - real time graphics straight out of a cat's a** hole.
w3rd
__________________
SPECS <-- mobo = fried R.I.P

New Pc:
Gigabye k8n-SLI NF4
AMD x2 4600+
Evga 7900gs 256mb
1gb pc 3200
160gb SATA II
aaahhh52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-04, 11:03 PM   #10
einstein_314
w00t!!
 
einstein_314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 2,905
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kojiro
I don't get artifacts in 3dmark 05.

3Dmark mark cinemas are better looking than those gay tech demos that nvida have.

I love ATI's Ruby demo.

I play Doom 3 all the time at 1200X1024 at High qality with 4x AA.
Watch what you say man. We don't want to start a flame thread do we? We all have our own opinions.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2GHz (9 x 355) w/ Swiftec APOGEE GTX Waterblock|| Asus P5B-Deluxe WiFi Edition
eVGA 8800 GTX Superclocked Edition @ 675/1150 w/ DangerDen 8800GTX Waterblock|| 4x1GB Mushkin XP2 PC2-8500
X-Fi Fatal1ty 64MB || PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W || Seagate 7200.10 320 GB || Dell 2407WFP
Logitech Z-5300 Speakers || Sennheiser HD555's || Logitech G7 || Logitech G15 || Windows Vista Ultimate x64
einstein_314 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-04, 11:01 PM   #11
holmes
Registered User
 
holmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 692
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

There's artifacts in 3Dmark05? Never seen any.. although I do use the 61.77s. Oh, and I agree that Doom3 does at times look just as good as 3Dmark05.
__________________

The Rig
ASRock 970 Extreme3 AM3+
AMD Athlon II x2 260
DDR3-1600 (2x2GB) Kingston HyperX
Western Digital caviar 1TB
ECS GeForce GT 220 1GB
Cooler Master Storm Scout ATX case
Corsair 750W PSU
holmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-04, 11:45 AM   #12
Intel17
Is not an Intel fanboi
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,368
Default Re: am i the only one that thinks Doom3 > 3dM2k5 game1 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nv40
have been "playing" with 3dmark 2005 for some time..and while its very nice ,to my surprise is doesnt match the quality i have seen in Doom3..at times. when you compare it to Game1. while shadows are softer ,and levels have more polygons , im conviced that Doom3 could have done that scene which far better quality. there are quite some big level in DOom3 that completely surpass the quality of 3dmark05 game1 a still you get far better performance

game3 is the only one that really i liked .. even though there are games with better water .. still looks pretty nice the test. apart from the flickering shadows that happens no matter if you use DST or not.

at the moment have been impressed with Doom3 graphics more than any other game or benchmark this year ,Farcry comes second

after seein 3dmark05 ,im even more impressed today with D3 engine.
That's John Carmack magic for ya! I agree, Doom3 looks absolutely stunning, technically and visually!

FarCry is second, but still feels like a game
Intel17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.