MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?

sohcguy · 12-18-04, 08:06 PM

A friend's computer scored a 303 in 3Dmark2003 witha MX4000, 512 megs of ram, 1.3? GHZ athlon. Is this about right?

**saturnotaku** · 12-18-04, 09:54 PM

For that CPU and card, that's about right.

sohcguy · 12-19-04, 06:48 PM

Thanks, I also , finally, found a review on the card and apparrently it won't play some of the games in 3Dmark2003 I guess because of the PSers on it. He didn't watch the benchmark as it went so I guess he didn't realize. I think the review said it was a DX7 card, yikes.

**saturnotaku** · 12-19-04, 08:48 PM

The MX4000 is nothing more than a glorified GeForce2 MX.

mikedep333 · 12-21-04, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saturnotaku

The MX4000 is nothing more than a glorified GeForce2 MX.

It's a continuation of the GF4 MX 440, but that beat any geforce2, even the ultra. So it was a decent budget card when it came out.

**WeReWoLf** · 12-22-04, 07:49 PM

At least the MX440 could run DX8.0... The MX4000 is only DX7.0

**saturnotaku** · 12-22-04, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900

At least the MX440 could run DX8.0... The MX4000 is only DX7.0

No, the MX440 was a DX7 part.

ragejg · 12-22-04, 08:30 PM

MX4000's use a 64 bit memory bus, and their performance doesn't scale with cpu speeds IIRC... they find themselves beat by not only MX440SE's, but also GF2ti's/Pro's/Ultras...

**WeReWoLf** · 12-22-04, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saturnotaku

No, the MX440 was a DX7 part.

Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0

rflair · 12-30-04, 05:28 PM

GF4's are DX8 not DX8.1 parts.

rflair
________
ipod games

T.h.o.m.a.s. · 12-31-04, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900

Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0

it might be a dx8 compatible card ,that does not mean it supports all the functions , its has NO pixel shaders , therefore not fully dx 8 compliant

ChrisRay · 12-31-04, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900

Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0

No the Geforce 4 MX 440 is actually a code named NV17, Which is based off the original NV10 with a new memory controller and multisampling anti aliasing. But the NV1x generation is Geforce 1 based.

12-18-04, 08:06 PM	#1
sohcguy Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 4	MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? A friend's computer scored a 303 in 3Dmark2003 witha MX4000, 512 megs of ram, 1.3? GHZ athlon. Is this about right? Last edited by sohcguy; 12-18-04 at 09:51 PM.

12-18-04, 09:54 PM	#2
saturnotaku Apple user. Deal with it. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The 'burbs, IL USA Posts: 12,502	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? For that CPU and card, that's about right.

12-19-04, 06:48 PM	#3
sohcguy Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 4	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? Thanks, I also , finally, found a review on the card and apparrently it won't play some of the games in 3Dmark2003 I guess because of the PSers on it. He didn't watch the benchmark as it went so I guess he didn't realize. I think the review said it was a DX7 card, yikes.

12-19-04, 08:48 PM	#4
saturnotaku Apple user. Deal with it. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The 'burbs, IL USA Posts: 12,502	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? The MX4000 is nothing more than a glorified GeForce2 MX.

12-22-04, 07:49 PM	#6
WeReWoLf Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 5,013	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? At least the MX440 could run DX8.0... The MX4000 is only DX7.0

12-22-04, 08:30 PM	#8
ragejg nV News Alumni Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Finger Lakes of Hell, NY Posts: 5,399	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? MX4000's use a 64 bit memory bus, and their performance doesn't scale with cpu speeds IIRC... they find themselves beat by not only MX440SE's, but also GF2ti's/Pro's/Ultras... __________________ 2010-2011 Reviews: GTX 570 \| GTX 580 \| GTS 450 \| GTX 460 \| GTX 465 Pre-2010 Reviews: 6600 GT \| XMS 4400 DDR \| SilenX Cooler \| 6800 \| 5900 XT \| Personal Cinema \| 5900 NU ______________________________________________ Phenom II x6 1090t @ 4.0 ghz \| Asus M498TD-EVO Am3 SLI nForce 980a \| 2x EVGA GTX 560 SLI \| 2x4gb DDR3-1333 \| Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU \| 60gb Mushkin Calisto Enhanced Sandforce SSD \| 2x WD2500KS RAID 0 \| Sunbeam Tuniq 3 case \| 24" Asus 19x10 LED LCD \| 26" Panasonic 720p TV \| Sidewinder X5 mouse \| Logitech MX5500 & Revolution mouse \| Altec Lansing 5.1 THX-Certified audio \| Win 7 Ultimate \| desk \| couch "Stars must die so that I may live. I... stepped out of a Supernova."

12-30-04, 05:28 PM	#10
rflair W OOO OOO Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: T.O. Canada Posts: 714	Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? GF4's are DX8 not DX8.1 parts. rflair ________ ipod games Last edited by rflair; 01-26-11 at 08:12 AM.