Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Microsoft Windows XP And Vista

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-05, 01:40 PM   #13
intercede007
American
 
intercede007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Destin, Florida
Posts: 331
Send a message via ICQ to intercede007 Send a message via AIM to intercede007 Send a message via MSN to intercede007 Send a message via Yahoo to intercede007
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuLinUX
I suppose it's how you set it up and besides, Linux is much cheaper and can be made just as sercure.
Is it?

My College did a feasability study and found that, by switching from Windows to Linux would be cheaper as far as software and future hardware requirements, but the re-training, lack of formal vendor support and the premium Linux specialists charge would off-set the cost, and may prove to be less efficient in the long run.

I guess it just sort of depends on your requirements.
intercede007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-05, 09:16 PM   #14
retsam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,602
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

you almost hit the nail on the head with the problems with linux.. the one thing you missed is the confussion with all the diffrent distro's... man its a mess. but security ... linux handles security much more thuroghly and more effiencly then windows... man i had to do tcp/ip stock hardining on a 2003 box...man lets just say that performance almost halved... we even called in an m$ engineer from redmond to work out the problems... what a nightmare that was. lets just say linux doesnt have the performance penalties that m$ takes for secuirty ....
retsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-05, 09:33 PM   #15
rewt
mmm, Beer.. :drooling:
 
rewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,667
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Knoppix Linux is pretty good. Theres even a version that runs completely off CD. No hard drives needed
__________________
My pimp'n rig
Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.6GHz (4100+) · Win XP Pro x86, Vista Ultimate x64 · eVGA K8-NF41 nForce4 SLi · Corsair XMS 1.5GB PC3200 CAS2/1T · eVGA 2x 6600GT SLi · Leadtek Winfast TV2000 XP Deluxe · Western Digital Caviar SE ½TB RAID 0/1 · PowerLink LPK2-30 400W · LiteON LDW-411S OC to 811S 8x DVD±R/RW/ROM · MicroAdvantage 64MB QuickiDrive · Samsung SyncMaster 931B 19" LCD · Microsoft Optical Wheel Mouse USB · Sony PSXtoUSB Analog Gamepads · Memorex MX2700 Multimedia Keyboard · Lexmark 3200 Color Jetprinter · nForce Network Controller 1Gb/s LAN (Cable ~3Mb/s down) · ΩPioneer Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound
rewt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-05, 09:50 PM   #16
retsam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,602
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

you should look at knoppix std ... this is by far my favorite distro.... all the fun security tools in one distro... how can you ask for anything else ...
retsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-05, 10:44 PM   #17
rewt
mmm, Beer.. :drooling:
 
rewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,667
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Sure thing. I'll give it a look.
__________________
My pimp'n rig
Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.6GHz (4100+) · Win XP Pro x86, Vista Ultimate x64 · eVGA K8-NF41 nForce4 SLi · Corsair XMS 1.5GB PC3200 CAS2/1T · eVGA 2x 6600GT SLi · Leadtek Winfast TV2000 XP Deluxe · Western Digital Caviar SE ½TB RAID 0/1 · PowerLink LPK2-30 400W · LiteON LDW-411S OC to 811S 8x DVD±R/RW/ROM · MicroAdvantage 64MB QuickiDrive · Samsung SyncMaster 931B 19" LCD · Microsoft Optical Wheel Mouse USB · Sony PSXtoUSB Analog Gamepads · Memorex MX2700 Multimedia Keyboard · Lexmark 3200 Color Jetprinter · nForce Network Controller 1Gb/s LAN (Cable ~3Mb/s down) · ΩPioneer Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound
rewt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-05, 05:49 PM   #18
rewt
mmm, Beer.. :drooling:
 
rewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,667
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

How safe is Windows when all you need is a boot disk that resets the administrator password?

http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/

Oh my god, it's so simple even a complete n00b could do it.

But then again, you could use the Linux bootloader to set a password and prevent from booting into Windows Oh wait, that would mean Linux is protecting Windows! I suppose that means Windows is the loser once again

LOL
__________________
My pimp'n rig
Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.6GHz (4100+) · Win XP Pro x86, Vista Ultimate x64 · eVGA K8-NF41 nForce4 SLi · Corsair XMS 1.5GB PC3200 CAS2/1T · eVGA 2x 6600GT SLi · Leadtek Winfast TV2000 XP Deluxe · Western Digital Caviar SE ½TB RAID 0/1 · PowerLink LPK2-30 400W · LiteON LDW-411S OC to 811S 8x DVD±R/RW/ROM · MicroAdvantage 64MB QuickiDrive · Samsung SyncMaster 931B 19" LCD · Microsoft Optical Wheel Mouse USB · Sony PSXtoUSB Analog Gamepads · Memorex MX2700 Multimedia Keyboard · Lexmark 3200 Color Jetprinter · nForce Network Controller 1Gb/s LAN (Cable ~3Mb/s down) · ΩPioneer Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound
rewt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-05, 08:02 PM   #19
TierMann
Bite my shiny, metal @ss!
 
TierMann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 1,586
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

You could also mount both OS's partitions with a live-cd. Neither OS can do much about someone who's bored, has a live-cd or floppy, and access to your desk.
__________________
Athlon 64 4400+ X2 (10x250= 2.5ghz) | Foxconn NF4KS8AA-8EKRS (nForce4 SLI) | 2GB OCZ DDR400 @ 416 (3-3-3-8) | eVGA 8800GTS 320mb
Red Diabolic Minotaur Case | PCP&C 610 Silencer | Samsung 19" 997DF + Acer AL1914smd-8 | G15 Keyboard | MX Revolution | 900Gb Storage
Vista Ultimate 32 + Gentoo Linux (Gnome + Beryl)
Athlon XP 3000+ | ECS KM400M2 3.0 | 512mb DDR333 | PNY 5200 Ultra
TV-Tuner | Silver Aspire X-Qpack w/Windows | WinXP MCE 2005 | 200Gb Storage
DVD Collection -- MySpace
TierMann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-05, 08:50 PM   #20
rewt
mmm, Beer.. :drooling:
 
rewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,667
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Good luck getting past the 256-bit AES encryption

Oh and what about Linux firewall iptables? That kicks Windows firewall in the arse!!
__________________
My pimp'n rig
Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.6GHz (4100+) · Win XP Pro x86, Vista Ultimate x64 · eVGA K8-NF41 nForce4 SLi · Corsair XMS 1.5GB PC3200 CAS2/1T · eVGA 2x 6600GT SLi · Leadtek Winfast TV2000 XP Deluxe · Western Digital Caviar SE ½TB RAID 0/1 · PowerLink LPK2-30 400W · LiteON LDW-411S OC to 811S 8x DVD±R/RW/ROM · MicroAdvantage 64MB QuickiDrive · Samsung SyncMaster 931B 19" LCD · Microsoft Optical Wheel Mouse USB · Sony PSXtoUSB Analog Gamepads · Memorex MX2700 Multimedia Keyboard · Lexmark 3200 Color Jetprinter · nForce Network Controller 1Gb/s LAN (Cable ~3Mb/s down) · ΩPioneer Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound
rewt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-15-05, 11:14 PM   #21
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,869
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

This is really a dumb comparison by just looking at one distro IMO, anybody who has done any hacking with both OSes and has half of a brain can clearly see that. Especially when you look at it from the desktop perspective.

The worst thing about windows is that in most cases you must have a damn firewall and antivirus in place in order to get any security at all, and even that guarentees you nothing at all. The reason why is because by default, microsoft leaves a multitude of services actively accepting incoming connections and half of them you can't even turn off. Not only that but in windows it is a real pain in the ass to get anything working if you don't have admin privileges (try burning a CD as a regular user,) so pretty much everybody that runs a win machine must run as the superuser (with gentoo it's a mere one line edit of the /etc/group.conf file, and different user levels aren't even needed since you have a nice convenient little list of permissions you can run through, and you can even specify what programs they can and can't run.) That means if just one of your programs is exploitable, firewall or no firewall (because you have to open the port when it runs anyways,) your entire system is screwed in windows.

In linux on the other hand, only the stuff in your /home/username dir is vulnerable, unless of course you really have no idea what the hell you are doing. The same thing applies if you ever download a virus.

Not to mention the shatter exploit which microsoft will never fix simply because they can't (its caused by a design flaw; pretty much the only way they could feasably fix it would be to redesign a whole new OS from scratch,) and almost renders different user levels useless in windows.

Hands down, linux is far more secure simply by its design. Sure there are exploits here and there, but those can be fixed. The biggest of windows' vulnerabilities can't be fixed. And anybody who tells you that if linux became more popular, it would see as many exploits as windows does. That may be true to a point, however the turn around time for *major* exploits being resolved on linux is typically within a period of hours to a few days because just anybody who knows how to write code can fix it, whereas microsoft is well known for leaving major exploits open for periods as long as two months. Forget about the redhat distros, personally I haven't touched one in three years.
__________________
Want to listen to audio without your computer going to sleep? Try this.

Core i7 2600k 4.4Ghz 1.385v | Corsair H60 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 8-8-8-24 | MSI P67A-G45 | OCZ Vertex 3 | Sapphire 7850 OC to Max settings


Last edited by Rakeesh; 03-15-05 at 11:28 PM.
Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-05, 02:19 AM   #22
TierMann
Bite my shiny, metal @ss!
 
TierMann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 1,586
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Quote:
Originally Posted by rewt
Good luck getting past the 256-bit AES encryption

Oh and what about Linux firewall iptables? That kicks Windows firewall in the arse!!
True, but you can encrypt either OS with 3rd party software also.
And iptables does rule.
__________________
Athlon 64 4400+ X2 (10x250= 2.5ghz) | Foxconn NF4KS8AA-8EKRS (nForce4 SLI) | 2GB OCZ DDR400 @ 416 (3-3-3-8) | eVGA 8800GTS 320mb
Red Diabolic Minotaur Case | PCP&C 610 Silencer | Samsung 19" 997DF + Acer AL1914smd-8 | G15 Keyboard | MX Revolution | 900Gb Storage
Vista Ultimate 32 + Gentoo Linux (Gnome + Beryl)
Athlon XP 3000+ | ECS KM400M2 3.0 | 512mb DDR333 | PNY 5200 Ultra
TV-Tuner | Silver Aspire X-Qpack w/Windows | WinXP MCE 2005 | 200Gb Storage
DVD Collection -- MySpace
TierMann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-07, 11:11 PM   #23
Ov3nCleaner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

Sorry for gravedigging, this thread is relevent again.

linux has come along way in security in recent years(and remember, security is only as good as its user), its just it hasnt been incorporated into major distros yet. Pioneers of security are: Hardened Debian, Hardened Gentoo, and Adamantix.
Check out these protections now being tested (they are old, but are making progress in working into a distro near you)

Features the common user can take advantage of with minimal performance drain(for all, around 3% assuming 100% cpu load):

100% Position Independent code (makes exploiting stack overflow exploits around 1000* harder, this has recently been added to vista on a small scale)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_independent_code

Pax
This is similar to windows DEP, but does not rely on hardware. It is generaly considered far more feature rich, and is considered by experts to be better than exec-shield by red hat. Has a bad habbit of killing programs that generate code on the stack at run time, but this is being fixed mostly, and can be worked around by a simple command.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PaX

ProPolice(rather old, but has recently been incorporated by default into distros like ubuntu)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack-s...28ProPolice.29

i use gentoo hardened myself, and i USED to have nvidias drivers working on it lol.
but linux still has issues with binary drivers, and new security technologies and nvidia apparently dont get along (its most likely a bug in Xorg for me however)

Security technologies on linux hopefully will be tighter integrated in the future, but for now its the casual users job to lock down his own system.

"This is really a dumb comparison by just looking at one distro IMO, anybody who has done any hacking with both OSes and has half of a brain can clearly see that. Especially when you look at it from the desktop perspective."

Yes, very true. If they had compared it with a hardened os, this would not be the case.

Dont get me wrong, Vista has made a big leap in security, but the whole idea for an OS that is 90% of the market having "Security Through obscurity" is just completely absurd.

And PS:

All you ubuntu trolls need to calm down. Your not aloud to even discuss security besides the fact that ubuntu truly has security through obscurity(besides propolice), although its getting better. I dont want to hear all this slashdot talk when your probobly have no idea how your system works one bit, outside of synaptic package manager. If you do, then no offense. but 99% of you are new linux converts and are being far to zealos, and scaring people away. Respect people regardless of their OS.
ubuntu is a great OS, but it people will not use it because your having a modern day linux crusade lol. They will use it when its ready, or they get fed up with windows
Ov3nCleaner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-07, 05:29 PM   #24
$n][pErMan
III%
 
$n][pErMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,726
Send a message via AIM to $n][pErMan
Default Re: Study: XP safer than Linux

I enjoy boths OS's.... but here is a nice little snippit of my own...
# of times my Windows computers have been hacked = 0
# of times my Linux computers have been hacked = 1

Not much but then again I have a ton of server apps running on linux which make it a nice target for some script kiddie with no life Also worth noting is that it was hacked years ago and I have had 0 issues sence.
__________________
Intel® Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.51GHz (390 x 9 / 1.39v) | ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP LGA 775 Intel P965 (1236 BIOS) | OCZ GOLD 8GB (2GB x 4) DDR2 PC2-8500 Dual Channel (4-4-4-12 780Mhz/1.95V 1:1 Ratio) | EVGA GeForce GTX 770 DUAL SuperClocked 4GB (Currently @ 1240MHz Core / 7112MHz Memory) | Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS | Zalman CNPS9700 LED Ultra Quiet CPU Cooler | Samsung SSD 840 Series 256GB | ASUS ProArt 24in Widescreen LED 1920 x 1200 | Samsung DVD-RW-DL 18x Burner w/ lightscribe| SILVERSTONE OP650 ATX12V / EPS12V 650W Power Supply | AOpen 5.1 Surround sound system | Windows 7 Pro x64
100% Orthos Stable!
$n][pErMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nVidia Linux drivers with Linux on Mac, help? Thetargos NVIDIA Linux 0 05-13-12 12:52 PM
EA gains Linux Attention. Better Quality Drivers Please! Ruinairas NVIDIA Linux 4 05-09-12 01:12 PM
Mandrake Linux 9.0 (Dolphin) now available | comments? volt General Linux 10 10-19-02 10:13 PM
Ti4200 and Linux Install Problem ultrajava NVIDIA Linux 5 09-28-02 08:13 AM
Linux VS. Windows XP! XP wins! dostler NVIDIA Linux 20 09-15-02 03:47 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.