Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-05, 04:24 PM   #1
Intel17
Is not an Intel fanboi
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,368
Default X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

According to Anton Bolshakov's Designer Diary...http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/st...w_6099542.html


S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is capable of more than 2 million fully bump-mapped polygons per frame as well as true per-pixel complex light-material interaction.
By targeting the latest hardware we have been able to base the engine fully on HDR (High Dynamic Range) lighting to increase the quality by addressing unnatural over- or under-exposed visuals found in traditional renderers.
Natural render of complex materials with proper light interaction, such as rusted metal, natural flora, glass, skin, and so on. In addition, every pixel (not texel) can have its own material with several coefficients.
The custom-built dedicated renderer is capable of real-time dynamic lighting, soft (physically correct) shadows cast from every object onto every other object, true per-pixel lighting, physical umbra/penumbra computations, and hundreds of lights per frame--all in real-time.
Frame buffer postprocessing and Photoshop-like effects.

Also, check out this DX9 video which is absolutely stunning...http://stalker.filefront.com/files/S...dia/Video;3783

It's at the top, the one with DX9 in the title.



To be honest, this engine is most probably more advanced than UE3, and does all the things Carmack wanted to do in his next engine!

Imagine that!

Realtime soft shadows everywhere from ALL geometry, based on all realtime lighting! HDR, SM3.0 etc...
Intel17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 04:33 PM   #2
superklye
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MKE
Posts: 13,629
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

Yeah, but I still think it only looks "meh"
superklye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 04:46 PM   #3
stncttr908
Registered User
 
stncttr908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 4,496
Send a message via AIM to stncttr908
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

The outdoor environments still look a little shaky, but the indoor DX9 effects are pretty damn good. This game had better deliver in the gameplay department, since we've all waited long enough already.
__________________
PC - | Core i7-2600K @ stock | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3 | 4GB Patriot Sector 5 DDR3 | Galaxy GTX 460 1GB @ stock | Corsair Force 120GB SSD | Seagate 1TB 7200RPM | 320GB Seagate 7200.10 | 2x Seagate 500GB USB 2.0 | Lite-On 20x SATA DVD+RW | Silverstone TJ-09 | Corsair 620W PSU | Logitech Z-5500s | Sennheiser HD-570 headphones | Samsung 2494LW |

Laptop - | Dell Inspiron 1420 | C2D T7300 (2.0GHz, 4MB cache) | 2GB DDR2-667 | 160GB 7200RPM HDD | DVD +/- RW | 14.1" WXGA+ (1440x900) | Broadcom 802.11g | NVIDIA 8400M GS 128MB |
stncttr908 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 04:56 PM   #4
AngelGraves13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

I had almost forgotten about this game until I saw this topic.

Yes, it is a great looking engine!
AngelGraves13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 05:00 PM   #5
brady
I'm like everyone else.
 
brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,376
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

i still think the cry engine is going to be the most advanced engine for AT LEAST the next 25 - 35 years.

sorry i couldnt resist. but now im curious about stalkers engine and im gunna try to download some of the vids.
__________________
C2Q @ 3.6GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 8GB DDR2 | EVGA GTX 580 SC 1.5GB | Windows 7 Ultimate x64

C2D @ 3.0GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 4GB DDR2 | HIS AMD 6990 4GB | OS X Lion 10.7 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 05:11 PM   #6
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

Can someone explain the "2 million polygons per frame" thing to me? I dont understand exactly what thats supposed to mean, or what Im supposed to compair it to.

Big numbers like that make me think of a game running like crap because the graphics card and CPU cant handle the load. Thats just what I get from it though...

That said, this game is still in my top 5 for games this year. I cant wait
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 05:16 PM   #7
brady
I'm like everyone else.
 
brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,376
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

wow i have to say that the screen shots ive seen do not do the game justice. i dled the dx9 demo video and the indoor environments are amazing. it really its exciting to every object casting a real time soft shadow. and in some of the scenes where there are what seems like dozens of pipes coming out of a wall it was very cool to see everything casting realistic shadows. im impressed.

incase you want to see the video i recommend dling it from stalkers page by right clicking and doing a save as instead of from filefront. its faster imo.
__________________
C2Q @ 3.6GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 8GB DDR2 | EVGA GTX 580 SC 1.5GB | Windows 7 Ultimate x64

C2D @ 3.0GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 4GB DDR2 | HIS AMD 6990 4GB | OS X Lion 10.7 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 05:32 PM   #8
brady
I'm like everyone else.
 
brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,376
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

just thought i would post an interview with the lead programmer. its very interesting i think.

Quote:
modDB.com: Thanks for taking the time out of your no doubt busy schedule to do this interview.

Oles: Sure, you are welcome. Sorry for the delayed reply.

modDB.com: Firstly, why don’t you go ahead and introduce yourself to our viewers at home.

Oles: I’m Oles Shyshkovtsov, Lead Programmer for S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

modDB.com: Two years ago, if I mentioned the name ‘GSC Game World’ or ‘S.T.A.L.K.E.R.’ to most people, I’d receive only looks of bewilderment, but now almost every hardcore gamer out there knows about you and your game. However, for those of us who have been living under our respective rocks for the past few years, what is the basic idea behind the game S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

Oles: Thanks for the compliments, much appreciated. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is a prophetic game that warns mankind of the dangers of carelessly playing with the powers of nature, like thoughtless experimentation with radioactivity. The game is set in a near future, after a mysterious second accident in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. This forms an open-ended world of 30 sq. km or 18 levels joined together in a global map. So the player has total freedom of action and movement as he can go wherever he wants to explore this world. His day-to-day tasks are collecting ‘artifacts of the Zone’ (objects which absorbed anomalous energy) and selling them to parties interested – ‘stalking’ therefore. The player’s ultimate goal is to solve the Zone’s puzzle and unveil the mystery behind the place.

modDB.com: You recently changed S.T.A.L.K.E.R.’s subtitle from “Oblivion Lost” to “Shadow of Chernobyl”. Why the change?

Oles: We decided to change the title as now it gives people a better idea of the setting and what to expect of the game.

modDB.com: Will S.T.A.L.K.E.R. ship on DVD, CD, or both? Will you consider online purchasing options, similar to what Valve has done with Half-Life 2?

Oles: We are thinking to release on several CDs. Possibly DVDs on certain territories, which depends on THQ’s, our worldwide publisher’s decision. On-line selling, no, don’t have a technology like that, you can only buy through traditional on-line stores.

modDB.com: We’ve already seen some of the impressive features of the X-Ray engine demonstrated in various videos and screenshots, but what would you say are your favourites, and what features can we expect from X-Ray that we would not find in other competing engines, such as Unreal Engine 2.5, Source, CryEngine and the Doom 3 engine?

Oles: We aim to ship with two versions of the engine – DirectX 8 and DirectX 9. Pretty much everything we’ve shown (bar a very few exceptions) has been from the DirectX 8 renderer and that alone has really stunned people with it’s quality. The DX9 plans are much more ambitious. There you will have up to 3.000.000 polygons on screen rendered in real time, totally dynamic lighting as well as soft dynamic shadows. We are using advanced shader technologies and virtual displacement mapping. One feature unseen in any other games yet is huge outdoor areas where all the lighting is processed dynamically will come with S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Find the full list of engine features at the main game’s web-site www.stalker-game.com.

modDB.com: How long have S.T.A.L.K.E.R. and the X-Ray engine been in development?

Oles: Oh, it’s been a long time by now. We started from scratch creating the engine back in late 2000. By now it’s four years of development, two game concepts tried, many nights without sleep and too many gallons of beer consumed.

modDB.com: Does GSC currently have any plans for a sequel, or expansion pack for S.T.A.L.K.E.R.? Also, are there any other games planned for the X-Ray engine, licensed or in-house?

Oles: We can’t think of anything else before we let the original game go. As for the engine, yes, we plan licensing it to third parties, so everybody interested, please, feel free to contact us.

modDB.com: What are the minimum system requirements to play the game? What about for servers?

Oles: We don’t know for sure until we are complete with the game. It’s expected that for a minimum you could do with GeForce 3-type card and 1.4 Gig processor. Ultimately, the more high-end PC you have, the more eye-candy you will get. For a dedicated server you could do with a machine with even lower specs than the minimal ones.

modDB.com: How scalable is the X-Ray engine; would I be able to run the game on older hardware smoothly, for example DirectX 7 generation video cards, by sacrificing a lot of detail, or does it rely heavily on more modern hardware?

Oles: Initially we supported the DX7 hardware, but at some point had to sacrifice it as we decided to put stake on the cutting-edge technology, and therefore DX8 and DX9 only.

modDB.com: Are you planning to release an SDK? If so, when do you plan to release it, and what goodies will it contain?

Oles: Yes, we intend to please MOD-makers with a pretty robust SDK, containing several editors (level, character, particle and shader), as well as AI, physics libraries and all necessary to create your own MODs of the game. The package should come either simultaneously with the game or shortly afterwards.
some things to point out:

1.
Quote:
Pretty much everything we’ve shown (bar a very few exceptions) has been from the DirectX 8 renderer and that alone has really stunned people with it’s quality
this explains at least why i was underwhelmed by most of what i have seen up untill now. and why i was blown away after viewing the video.

2.
Quote:
One feature unseen in any other games yet is huge outdoor areas where all the lighting is processed dynamically
this is true and very exciting. far cry does not implement 100% dynamic lighting in outdoor scenes (or indoor for that matter). i think this will be very interesting to see. as far as i can tell none of the outdoor videos or screenshots show this. but that is just my perception. and although doom 3 can do this, it wasnt done. im sure we have all heard about the project to make large outdoor areas though.
__________________
C2Q @ 3.6GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 8GB DDR2 | EVGA GTX 580 SC 1.5GB | Windows 7 Ultimate x64

C2D @ 3.0GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 4GB DDR2 | HIS AMD 6990 4GB | OS X Lion 10.7 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
brady is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-05, 05:55 PM   #9
Mr. Hunt
Rectal Gravy Connoisseur
 
Mr. Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,294
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

I think it is overrated... everything I have seen from it so far just looks terrible... if it is so great... they should hire good modelers/texture artists... because their current textures/models... suck.
Mr. Hunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 06:49 PM   #10
Intel17
Is not an Intel fanboi
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,368
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hunt
I think it is overrated... everything I have seen from it so far just looks terrible... if it is so great... they should hire good modelers/texture artists... because their current textures/models... suck.
If you've watched the video, the DX9 stuff looks way better than the DX8 stuff, and almost 99% of the stuff shown is DX8 :-)
Intel17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 07:50 PM   #11
Bad_Boy
god of war.
 
Bad_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: greensboro, nc.
Posts: 2,911
Send a message via AIM to Bad_Boy
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

lots has changed since that leaked alpha...lets just hope the framerate is still high in the final
__________________
[PS ID: Bad_Boy]
Bad_Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-05, 07:54 PM   #12
brady
I'm like everyone else.
 
brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,376
Default Re: X-Ray Engine...completely underrated!

Quote:
everything I have seen from it so far just looks terrible
i guess thats kindof my point. most of what we have seen is from dx8 rendering. i agree it doesnt look very impressive. but the dx9 looks much better i think.

but i know everyone is entitled to an opinion so if you still think it looks terrible even after viewing the dx9 demo thats ok by me. i just disagree. but only time will tell. it could come out and suck really bad. im excited for it right now though.
__________________
C2Q @ 3.6GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 8GB DDR2 | EVGA GTX 580 SC 1.5GB | Windows 7 Ultimate x64

C2D @ 3.0GHz | GA-P35-DS3L | 4GB DDR2 | HIS AMD 6990 4GB | OS X Lion 10.7 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regression with 295.33 and GeForce GT 240 maro NVIDIA Linux 16 06-29-12 06:47 PM
Valve's Source engine to power upcoming animated film News Archived News Items 0 06-10-12 09:20 PM
Gorgeous Unreal Engine 4 brings direct programming, indirect lighting News Archived News Items 0 06-08-12 09:20 PM
Star Wars 1313 running on Unreal Engine 3 on PC at E3, will be linear and light on Je News Archived News Items 0 06-08-12 05:20 AM
May 24 Webinar: How Do You Make Grid Engine Faster? News Archived News Items 0 05-22-12 06:30 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.