Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-04-05, 06:34 PM   #13
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aAv7
I agree, fear is a " the ring rip-off ", and it looks quite cheesy to me. OOOH a little girl in the dark, big f*ckin deal. So we have the matrix bullet time, mixed with little girls this forum is so "fear"ful of....I dunno man, to each his own..

Quake 4 looks simply awesome, and the fact that pcgamer rated it a 70% doesnt bother me at all, because well....it's pcgamer....these are the same schlucks that gave doom 3 like a 90 or 95%....
I hate to break it to you, but quake4 looks extremely similar to doom3. It even has the monsters in the closets. Not as much though.

May I ask why Quake 4 looks awesome to you but Fear doesn't? Quake4 has Guns, Monsters, Blood... hmmm I seem to remember alot of that in movies too. To say that "Bullet time" was in the Matrix is not a very good comparision IMO. When have you seen it in an FPS? Never. When have you seen a "physchological thriller" in an FPS? Never.

And quake4? What exactly does it have that Fear doesn't appear to have?

I'm looking forward to both, but I miss admit, quake4 looks a little stale on the SP portion. I've said it before, but I am really looking forward to quake4 MP more than the SP.

I honostly cannot see how you can like FPS games but not like FEAR. Its like liking Choclate, but not liking Choclate Cake. It's just weird.
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 06:47 PM   #14
de><ta
prodigy
 
de><ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA, NY
Posts: 1,100
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

I for one am not going to deprive myself of both of these games. Both these games look awesome and I dont give a fluffy rats ass on how PC gamer rates its games.

<flame> btw. how long is the gameplay in FEAR supposed to be any way</flame><runs>

I cant wait to start playing Quake 4 again with my old Quake buddies.
__________________
IBM T60p | Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 | 2GB PC2-5300 | ATi M X1700 256MB | 100GB 7200rpm SATA

///m-powered | Intel i7 920 | EVGA x58 | 6GB DD3 1600 | EVGA GTX 285 SSC | 150GB VelociRaptor

Drag racing is for fast cars. Autocrossing is for fast drivers.
de><ta is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 08:11 PM   #15
aAv7
 
aAv7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jAkUp
I hate to break it to you, but quake4 looks extremely similar to doom3. It even has the monsters in the closets. Not as much though.

May I ask why Quake 4 looks awesome to you but Fear doesn't? Quake4 has Guns, Monsters, Blood... hmmm I seem to remember alot of that in movies too. To say that "Bullet time" was in the Matrix is not a very good comparision IMO. When have you seen it in an FPS? Never. When have you seen a "physchological thriller" in an FPS? Never.

And quake4? What exactly does it have that Fear doesn't appear to have?

I'm looking forward to both, but I miss admit, quake4 looks a little stale on the SP portion. I've said it before, but I am really looking forward to quake4 MP more than the SP.

I honostly cannot see how you can like FPS games but not like FEAR. Its like liking Choclate, but not liking Choclate Cake. It's just weird.
It's just, since way back last year when the first batch of screens and info hit the net about f.e.a.r, I just didn't care. The game isn't bringing anything new to the table, it's using cliched themes and typical dx9 style graphics. Nothing is wowing me, not the gameplay, not the graphics, not the theme of the game, the story, nothing. I know it's like THE fps game to have, but I have 0 interest in it. Just me. It's 10 hours of forgettable gameplay in my eyes.

Now don't get me wrong, Quake 4 is gonna be as cliched as they get. But I have hopes for it, and the first 3, I loved, which is what brings my interest in it. I have hopes for the SP portion, and even though I felt doom 3 sucked, I do feel it was, and still is the most impressive looking game on the market, which makes me feel Quake 4 will take a notch further, add in fighting them strogg again, and i'm one excited gamer.

I'm one for innovation and new IP's. Fear does do that, it brings a new franchise for them to eventually milk to the table. The thing is there isnt one aspect that interests me, at least not in the demo(s). I'll buy f.e.a.r, simply because I love fps's and I HAVE to give it a fair shot. And the rest of the year aside from these two games is quite dry for the fps market. Am I looking forward to it though? No. I hope it does rule, I just aint all hyped for it.

Quake 4 to me, seems like something that was made for the fans, for gamers, for sp folks and mp folks, for people looking for some fun.

Fear thus far, comes off to me like a long benchmark. w00t, my rig runs it at an avg of 70fps! I guess it's the style, or maybe the damn oversaturated sequels in the market have begun to make me ho-hum when new ip's come along and I just have yet to realize it.

BUT REST ASSURE, I WILL BUY IT AND GIVE IT A FAIR CHANCE. Now if I put it up for sale here in the sale forum a week later, remains to be seen.
__________________
[SIZE="1"][B]CPU:[/B] AMD64 3200+ Winchester @ 2.2 [B]RAM:[/B] 2GB Kingston Dual Channel DDR 400 [B]Motherboard:[/B] Gigabyte K8 Triton nForce4 [B]VideoCard:[/B] eVGA GeForce 7800GTX 512MB [B]Hard Drive:[/B] WD 250GB Sata [B]OS:[/B] Dual boot, Windows XP Home/Windows Professional x64 Edition Retail[B] Audio:[/B] X-Fi Xtreme Music [B]Mouse:[/B] Logitech MX 310 [B]PSU:[/B] 500W Ultra Connect (34A on the 12V+)[/SIZE]

[SIZE="1"][B]Xbox 360:[/B] w/ Intercooler @ 1280x1024 , Dynasty Warriors 5, Fight Night Round 3, Kameo, NBA 2K6, Perfect Dark Zero CE, and PGR 3[SIZE="1"][/SIZE][/SIZE]
aAv7 is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 08:31 PM   #16
anzak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,553
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aAv7
It's just, since way back last year when the first batch of screens and info hit the net about f.e.a.r, I just didn't care. The game isn't bringing anything new to the table.
Not bringing anything to the table?

Advanced A.I. that is a HUGE step above anything else we have seen so far.
Slow-mo gameplay.
Real-time soft shadows and massive numbers of particle effects.
A truly creepy environment (unlike Doom 3 which relied on things spawning in front of or behind you)

If F.E.A.R. isn't innovative then what was? Half Life 2? It did a good job of using physics in the gameplay. Doom 3? Wow, stencil shadows and lots of bump mapping.
anzak is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 08:50 PM   #17
OWA
...
 
OWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9,481
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Hmm, disappointing it was not higher rated but I never go by game reviews or movie reviews for that matter. I still plan to buy both (Q4 and Fear) but I also won't mind it being like Doom 3 (if it is) since D3 is one my favorites.
OWA is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 09:18 PM   #18
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aAv7
It's just, since way back last year when the first batch of screens and info hit the net about f.e.a.r, I just didn't care. The game isn't bringing anything new to the table, it's using cliched themes and typical dx9 style graphics. Nothing is wowing me, not the gameplay, not the graphics, not the theme of the game, the story, nothing. I know it's like THE fps game to have, but I have 0 interest in it. Just me. It's 10 hours of forgettable gameplay in my eyes.

Now don't get me wrong, Quake 4 is gonna be as cliched as they get. But I have hopes for it, and the first 3, I loved, which is what brings my interest in it. I have hopes for the SP portion, and even though I felt doom 3 sucked, I do feel it was, and still is the most impressive looking game on the market, which makes me feel Quake 4 will take a notch further, add in fighting them strogg again, and i'm one excited gamer.

I'm one for innovation and new IP's. Fear does do that, it brings a new franchise for them to eventually milk to the table. The thing is there isnt one aspect that interests me, at least not in the demo(s). I'll buy f.e.a.r, simply because I love fps's and I HAVE to give it a fair shot. And the rest of the year aside from these two games is quite dry for the fps market. Am I looking forward to it though? No. I hope it does rule, I just aint all hyped for it.

Quake 4 to me, seems like something that was made for the fans, for gamers, for sp folks and mp folks, for people looking for some fun.

Fear thus far, comes off to me like a long benchmark. w00t, my rig runs it at an avg of 70fps! I guess it's the style, or maybe the damn oversaturated sequels in the market have begun to make me ho-hum when new ip's come along and I just have yet to realize it.

BUT REST ASSURE, I WILL BUY IT AND GIVE IT A FAIR CHANCE. Now if I put it up for sale here in the sale forum a week later, remains to be seen.

Ok well fair enough, I too hope quake4 is gonna be awesome. Some of my best gaming memories were quake2... I doubt it will be similar to the older quake's, but theres alot of nostalgia involved
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 09:53 PM   #19
toxikneedle
this.is.a.chemical.burn
 
toxikneedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,323
Send a message via AIM to toxikneedle Send a message via MSN to toxikneedle
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

I don't agree, a lot of games that don't progress that much from their first title still do good in reviews. Max Payne 2 for example was very similar to the original in many ways... but it still did great with reviewers and stuff.
__________________
[cpu]amd.x2.4400 . [ram]crucial.2gb.3200 . [gpu]evga.8800.gts . [hdd]wd.raptor.74gb ::
toxikneedle is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 09:57 PM   #20
Gabrobot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 141
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Just want to point out that later in that same thread someone else claims to have gotten a partial scan of the review and it starts out with "We're now ready to put the official stamp of 'Mind bending awesomeness' on Raven software's followup to the ID legend.", which doesn't sound like the beginning of a 70% review.
Gabrobot is offline  

Old 10-04-05, 10:06 PM   #21
aAv7
 
aAv7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by anzak
Not bringing anything to the table?

Advanced A.I. that is a HUGE step above anything else we have seen so far.
Slow-mo gameplay.
Real-time soft shadows and massive numbers of particle effects.
A truly creepy environment (unlike Doom 3 which relied on things spawning in front of or behind you)

If F.E.A.R. isn't innovative then what was? Half Life 2? It did a good job of using physics in the gameplay. Doom 3? Wow, stencil shadows and lots of bump mapping.
Every game claims to have advanced A.I, I didnt see anything advanced in the demo.

Slow-mo gameplay, max payne?

Truly creppy environment, again, personal tastes, i'm more afraid of demons from hell than 8 year girls...just me tho...

Real Time soft shadows...that run like ass even on sli systems....
By the time those shadows are playable, 50 other games with better options will be out.
__________________
[SIZE="1"][B]CPU:[/B] AMD64 3200+ Winchester @ 2.2 [B]RAM:[/B] 2GB Kingston Dual Channel DDR 400 [B]Motherboard:[/B] Gigabyte K8 Triton nForce4 [B]VideoCard:[/B] eVGA GeForce 7800GTX 512MB [B]Hard Drive:[/B] WD 250GB Sata [B]OS:[/B] Dual boot, Windows XP Home/Windows Professional x64 Edition Retail[B] Audio:[/B] X-Fi Xtreme Music [B]Mouse:[/B] Logitech MX 310 [B]PSU:[/B] 500W Ultra Connect (34A on the 12V+)[/SIZE]

[SIZE="1"][B]Xbox 360:[/B] w/ Intercooler @ 1280x1024 , Dynasty Warriors 5, Fight Night Round 3, Kameo, NBA 2K6, Perfect Dark Zero CE, and PGR 3[SIZE="1"][/SIZE][/SIZE]
aAv7 is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 10:25 PM   #22
Gabrobot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 141
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aAv7
Real Time soft shadows...that run like ass even on sli systems....
By the time those shadows are playable, 50 other games with better options will be out.
Not to mention that Chronicles of Riddick already had soft stencil shadows...all they're doing in both CoR and Fear is blurring the stencil shadows. You could put that in any game with stencil shadows (hell, we might even find that Quake 4 has them).
Gabrobot is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 10:36 PM   #23
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hunt
2.) Matrix didn't invent slow motion... stop acting like it did.
thats right, Dave Chappelle showed us how everything is better in slow motion.

on a more serious note, FEAR is a better choice in my opinion. i think the demo is awesome. its got great graphics, good theme (at least unused) and i havent really played a game with that horror theme. i mean Doom3 had it a little, but it was more aliens and crap. that little girl scared the **** out of me the first time i saw it, i can admit it, heh.

Quake4's opportunity to redeem itself to me is in the MP department. if they can bring a good style MP to the table like quakeIII did (same style of play, as that seems to be the best for MP's) then i would definitely get it. Doom3's MP sucked ass, and everyone knows it. doesnt everyone love shootin ppl with crap loads of lag at 20 fps? i know i loved it...
ViN86 is offline  
Old 10-04-05, 11:47 PM   #24
Acid Rain
What a sweet little...
 
Acid Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Coast, USA.
Posts: 1,248
Default Re: PCgamer slammed Quake4 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViN86
Doom3's MP sucked ass, and everyone knows it. doesnt everyone love shootin ppl with crap loads of lag at 20 fps? i know i loved it...
I love Doom 3 MP. The secret: LAN play and a good stock of game freak friends.

It's very satisfying hearing a clueless buddy in the other room scream as you slink out of a shadow from behind and use the shotty at point blank. This kind of thing is especially excellent after a tense bit of "I hear you...where are you?...I just heard you, I know you're somewhere around-*BOOM*" Heh.

No lag problems here. I've always been a lan guy though.

I have a feeling Quake IV will essentially replace Quake 3 in the multiplayer department (well, duh!) as a Quake fan's favorite fragfest. Single player looks like fun too, and I'm loving those mechs and Strogg machinery. Actually, I think I will love the whole thing.

PC Gamer often gives ratings that don't stack up anymore. They reviewed HL2 and didn't mention bugs of any sort, or any problems, really. They just slapped it with a 10, said every aspect was akin to Christ Reborn and shipped the magazine.
__________________
MY PIG
MB: GA-EP45-UD3P
CPU: Q6600 (SLACR)
RAM: 4GB KHX6400D2LLK2
3D Porkware: Radeon HD 4890
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 with MSE
Aux Equipment: Phase-B Nanocycloptics
Acid Rain is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA launches GeForce GTX 670, Zotac's AMP! Reviewed (PCGamer) News GeForce GTX 670 Reviews 0 05-10-12 10:11 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.