Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

View Poll Results: Which game's combat plays closest to the original half-life's?
Half-life 2, look, headcrabs! 22 43.14%
F.E.A.R., these squads are amazing! 21 41.18%
I never played the original half-life, shame on me. 8 15.69%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-05, 06:34 PM   #1
myshkinbob
Registered User
 
myshkinbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 402
Default F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

Before you vote, read the argument.

Games play differently for different people, so this is my definition of hl1 gameplay. Basically you were stuck in a research base, trying to get out, and you had to fight past a lot of special ops on the way. There were zombies and headcrabs and aliens that spat green goo at you, but the fun of hl1 was coming up against those clever AI squads. Most of the game was either offices, labs, or for the most part just grey concrete areas. There were those xen levels, but they were always considered the low point of hl1. I used to grin when i got to a new area and faintly heard that radio chatter, i'd check my ammo, and try to scope out where they were. you got a really intense firefight every time, and if you went back to your savegame, it played differently the next time. And then you had the mysterious gman sightings every now and then too. But what made hl1 so much fun to play, for me at least, was the great squad AI and combat, and the well designed areas you fought them in. There hasn't been a game since to get back to that kind of great gameplay. When you weren't fighting, you were wondering about the mysterious gman and what was going on in this game's universe.

so onto fear. Most of the time you're in a research building, in either offices, labs, or mostly concrete areas of some sort. alma/fettel sightings are just like seeing the gman, try to catch up with them and they're gone. But the big reason it feels more like a hl sequel than hl2, is the squad combat. Again you're in these everyday environments, and you hear a faint radio chatter up ahead, you get the same feeling as with hl1. you'll check your ammo, decide on your approach weapon, try to spot the first guy. You know these guys will talk to each other, and flank you, and try to flush you out, if you hit them they'll limp, and if you get the upper hand you see them turn tail and run. You get the same intense dynamic firefights, and if you reload your save, the situation will play differently. The environments and combat feel just like hl1's, only updated to 2005 in effects and presentation. All that's missing is the oh so familiar "fire in the hole!", although you do get "frag out!" now, heh.

To me the gameplay feels like the first natural sequel to half-life, fighting the same great dynamic and intelligent squads, in the same kind of environments, with similar weapons, and a few new twists (slowmo, more destructable environment). It's the first game to reproduce and then build on what made half-life so much fun, for me. And the storyline to some extent felt the same as hl1, you know very little of what's going on in this game universe, people want things hushed up, larger unseen forces at are play.

don't get me wrong. I enjoyed half-life 2. But none of the combat reproduced the half-life1 gameplay. The weapons all felt 'loose', like they didn't connect with anything properly, the bullet spread was all over the place. The AI was challenging, but you never felt like you were facing the same kind of squads from the first game; you rarely got flanked, they didn't communicate very much, to me they came across as waves of individual baddies, and not cohesive units. The character and story development made it feel like the half-life universe, unmistakeably, but the actual gameplay felt like some other company had been asked to make the sequel and took the game in their own direction. Half-life2 was a great game, they got all kinds of gameplay in it, everything except the original's combat. Remember the e3 video, of that squad chasing you, that later turned out to be scripted, that's what i expected of hl2, great squad combat. And it seems like fear delivered what was seen in that e3 video from 2003. guy's moving world objects for cover, kicking in doors, coming through the windows, calling for backup, chasing you down, flanking you, always communicating with each other.

Anyway, i'm interested to hear anyone elses opinion on this.
__________________
Core2Duo E6400 (3.0GHz@1.3v) | Gigabyte 965P-DS3 | 2x 1024MB Elixir PC6400 (Dual-Channel DDR2@1.8v) | 3x Spinpoint SATA 80GB | Gainward GeForce 8800GTS (@600/1900) | Mitsubishi DiamondPlus 93SB 19" (1600x1200@75Hz)
myshkinbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 07:20 PM   #2
grey_1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

Good food for thought! I enjoyed a bit of hl2's combat, but always wondered what the buzz was all about. The ai seemed on par with hl1 but...maybe I just bought into the hype. Now F.E.A.R. comes along and I get everything I expected from hl2 and then some. The combat is very tight, I love the weapons balancing, and I loved the fact that I was killed because I underestimated the bad guys by a long shot, not just cuz they could take a lot of hits. Awesome!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 07:48 PM   #3
Lazaredz
Giggitty
 
Lazaredz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I agree with the idea that the combat/enemy and even weapons in FEAR are much more in the vein of HL than HL2. HL2 (in my opinion) was much more run&gun than the original. FEAR and HL seem to have simular pacing to me.

Good dicussion BTW!
Lazaredz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 07:56 PM   #4
H3avyM3tal
SB's Twin Blades
 
H3avyM3tal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,138
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I really dont know what is so great about the damn AI in fear...
I mean, most of the time I throw one grenade, than set out with a shotgun and slaughter every on of them. Hell, I can sit in one place and shoot them as they come for me. Whats even worse, when they go through their little animations, like crawling or going down a ladder or something, its easy to kill them. They are stupid.

Common, one gut knocks down a friggin closet or something, than crawl under it towards me. I stand infront of him, and I just laugh as I kill him. They are stupid. Nothing revolutionary there, just some great atmosphere. And I bearly use other guns than the shotgun too... Kinda remind me of Doom3...

And for yer question, the hl2 AI seems closer to the original. The only problem with games like these, is that you are actually always faster than them, so you can be the special op, not them stupid AI. They dont even hear you coming...

Edit: Oh and I forgot to mention this: whenever I hear the radio chtter, the AI says that I am the one trying to flank them.... Stupid, but fun.
H3avyM3tal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 10:54 PM   #5
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I think the AI in HL2 is worse than HL1. The AI in Fear is easily the best I have ever seen in a game.

As a gamer, we expect the AI to have certain limitations. In Fear I had to constantly rethink my approaches because I know they don't have the same limitations as other games.
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 11:13 PM   #6
Sazar
Sayonara !!!
 
Sazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

HL2 bad guys were too scripted tbh.

They have their moments but I have more fun playing Halo on xbox coz those buggers come out and get you and make sure you're dead.

FEAR has pretty decent AI though I still remember the headaches HL's goons gave me coz they could actually think
Sazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 11:15 PM   #7
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

Yea the Half Life 1 AI was amazing, especially for the time. I remember being just amazed.
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-05, 11:40 PM   #8
HowlingPhoenix
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I voted for the 3rd option cause I never really played through HL1 all the way. I guess I need to re-install it and see what I am missing.
The A.I. in F.E.A.R. is decent so far, nothing about it has impressed me too much yet.
HowlingPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-24-05, 02:44 AM   #9
nutcrackr
Super Registered User
 
nutcrackr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,210
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I played HL1 heaps and I don't feel that FEAR is anything like HL.
__________________
.
nutcrackr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-05, 03:07 AM   #10
PSYCHODAD
cereal killer
 
PSYCHODAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: indiana
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I haven't played F.E.A.R. yet. However, the F.E.A.R. demo reminded me alot of a good sven coop level, which is a HL1 mod btw.
__________________
System #1
CPU INTEL|3rd gen I-7@3.7ghz
16gb memory Windows 7 home premium 64 bit
PSU Siverstone Zeus 850w
EVGA 660gtx
Logitech G400 gaming mouse
Dell 2407WFP 24" lcd


Video Games -- Why waste good technology on science and medicine?
PSYCHODAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-05, 04:44 AM   #11
F_L_C
Fun Lovin' Criminal
 
F_L_C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 483
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

I've been meaning to play HL1 since finishing HL2. Needless to say, I didn't understand many of the references to the original when I played it. Yes, a shame, but I'm gonna wait until Black Mesa Source is released to figure out what I missed.

Anyway, my opinion of AI in four great games:

FEAR > Far Cry > HL2 > D3
__________________
Abit AN7 [] XP-M 2400 => MCW6002 | ProCore | MCP600 [] OCZ 1.5GB PC3200 [] eVGA 7800GS => VF700 [] 2x160GB 'cuda RAID 0 [] SoundStorm => Z-5500
nForce123 drivers here.
F_L_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-05, 05:03 AM   #12
lightman
Registered User
 
lightman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,026
Send a message via ICQ to lightman
Default Re: F.E.A.R. - a better half-life sequel than hl2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by myshkinbob
All that's missing is the oh so familiar "fire in the hole!", although you do get "frag out!" now, heh.
You should pay more attention then

I can assure you I heard at least a couple of times the oh so familiar "fire in the hole!"
lightman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legit Half Life 3 concept arts leaked AthlonXP1800 Gaming Central 5 06-29-12 03:27 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.