Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-18-06, 08:47 PM   #121
Flavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 211
Talking Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Wow, I broke 2300!!

2305 3dmarks
sm2.0 1028
hdr/sm3.0 933
cpu 690
__________________
P4 3.0C HT @ 3100MHz | Intel D875PBZ | 1GB Kingston ValueRAM @ 1032MHz (3-3-3-6) | BFG 6800GT OC @ stock | Seagate 300GB SATA| Audigy 2
Flavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:11 PM   #122
Roliath
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

UPDATED SCORE

3DMark06 Score - 6015
SM2.0 Score - 2512
HDR/SM3.0 Score - 2492
CPU Score - 1976

XFX 7800GTX 512MB - 81.95 - 630/1840

Compare Link
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:18 PM   #123
Clay
Registered User
 
Clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,993
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by lightman
It was kind of rocky at first but I'm getting a decent d/l speed (about 15kB/s more than the swarm avg)
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:26 PM   #124
xgman
Registered User
 
xgman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 264
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

First run got 6576 on a single 7800gtx 512 (overclocked) to with cpu at 2900.
__________________
Mac Pro - 8 core xeon 5462 (3.2ghz per) - 16GB ram - 8800GT - Dual boot leopard/win7/64 WD Black drives - Konnekt Live-Samsung HTAS720ST sound - Dell3007wfp
xgman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:34 PM   #125
verboten
Registered User
 
verboten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 48
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

5764 3DMarks

sm2 - 3109
sm3 - 3063
cpu- 948



MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI
AMD64 4000+ San Diego
Antec TruPower 2.0 550w
2x OCZ PC3200 1GB OCZ4002048ELDCPE-K
2x ASUS 7800GTX
2x WD 200GB Sata2
2x WD Raptor
WinXP Pro
verboten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:57 PM   #126
Tygerwoody
mega ultra God Tit Lord
 
Tygerwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,934
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

where is jAkUp's score? I wanna see those dual GTX512's in action....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadhog View Post
if tygerwoody says its bad, its bad.
Tygerwoody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:58 PM   #127
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

fyi, bit torrent is the way to go if you want to download it atm. i got it in one hr

3DMark06 Results:

4657 3D Marks
SM2.0 Score 1930
HDR/SM3.0 Score 1918
CPU Score 1580

im pleased
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 09:59 PM   #128
$n][pErMan
III%
 
$n][pErMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,726
Send a message via AIM to $n][pErMan
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tygerwoody
where is jAkUp's score? I wanna see those dual GTX512's in action....
All his high end fancy stuff... cant get him ditched in lines for the download ... lol.
__________________
Intel® Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.51GHz (390 x 9 / 1.39v) | ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP LGA 775 Intel P965 (1236 BIOS) | OCZ GOLD 8GB (2GB x 4) DDR2 PC2-8500 Dual Channel (4-4-4-12 780Mhz/1.95V 1:1 Ratio) | EVGA GeForce GTX 770 DUAL SuperClocked 4GB (Currently @ 1240MHz Core / 7112MHz Memory) | Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS | Zalman CNPS9700 LED Ultra Quiet CPU Cooler | Samsung SSD 840 Series 256GB | ASUS ProArt 24in Widescreen LED 1920 x 1200 | Samsung DVD-RW-DL 18x Burner w/ lightscribe| SILVERSTONE OP650 ATX12V / EPS12V 650W Power Supply | AOpen 5.1 Surround sound system | Windows 7 Pro x64
100% Orthos Stable!
$n][pErMan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-18-06, 10:04 PM   #129
Clay
Registered User
 
Clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,993
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViN86
fyi, bit torrent is the way to go if you want to download it atm. i got it in one hr
Very true! I've never messed with torrents but decided to give Azureus a whirl tonight, did some crash course reading on their wiki on all the ins/outs of what I need to know settings-wise. I had my u/l set to anywhere between 60~115KB/s and was getting about 40KB/s d/l...but that was slowing my browsing quite a bit so I dropped u/l to 20KB/s and then I started getting 200KB/s + d/l speeds! Sorry, I know I'm a noob at Azureus, just neat to see the tweaking pay off.
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 10:26 PM   #130
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay
Very true! I've never messed with torrents but decided to give Azureus a whirl tonight, did some crash course reading on their wiki on all the ins/outs of what I need to know settings-wise. I had my u/l set to anywhere between 60~115KB/s and was getting about 40KB/s d/l...but that was slowing my browsing quite a bit so I dropped u/l to 20KB/s and then I started getting 200KB/s + d/l speeds! Sorry, I know I'm a noob at Azureus, just neat to see the tweaking pay off.
oh great choice, i love azureus. if you have your router configured correctly, you can get direct connections and it absolutely flies. also, if the tracker is down, azureus has an awesome de-centralized tracker. great program
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 10:53 PM   #131
Clay
Registered User
 
Clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,993
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViN86
oh great choice, i love azureus. if you have your router configured correctly, you can get direct connections and it absolutely flies. also, if the tracker is down, azureus has an awesome de-centralized tracker. great program
I setup my router to port forward TCP/UDP traffic to a static IP that I set on my PC if that's what you mean. If you don't mind, I'd like to discuss further over here.
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-06, 11:19 PM   #132
Tygerwoody
mega ultra God Tit Lord
 
Tygerwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,934
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

that was the biggest peice of crap benchmark ever. I saw someone said it was "3dMark2005 , but with more effects", but i didnt think they meant it LITTERALLY.

Jesus how LAZY can you get? Use the SAME EXACT benchmarks over again, only make them SLOWER and in my opinion have LESS DETAIL.

1759 btw
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadhog View Post
if tygerwoody says its bad, its bad.
Tygerwoody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 09:00 PM
nForce2 "First Look" and fly-by benchmark GamblerFEXonlin Feedback Forum 4 10-01-02 08:48 PM
UT2003 Demo Benchmark info Gargr Gaming Central 28 09-21-02 08:48 PM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-31-02 12:02 AM
AMD 2400+ and 2600+ Benchmark Extrapolations savyj CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 2 08-17-02 10:32 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.