Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-04-08, 02:38 PM   #841
Delbert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Station X
Posts: 517
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Okay... i was close to 16K and it was staring at me.

So.... i upped the fans, set the CPU ro 3.6G, GPU to 780/2000/2200 (core/shaders/mem) and went for it....
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13172794
16379....
Might try for 16.5K ... just need to get the core up to 800.
Click image for larger version

Name:	temps.JPG
Views:	122
Size:	251.5 KB
ID:	29735
__________________
Q6600@3.6G (1.35v), 480 SoC (870/2000), 4Gig Mem, Abit IP35 Pro, Corsair HX620, 1x250Gig (OS), 2x250Gig (Games), P182. Win7... 290.53... http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/
Delbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 03:41 PM   #842
sytaylor
Cerebral Barbarian
 
sytaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1,656
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Thats just insane, at least you know if you dont wanna upgrade theres room in them thar hills
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 @ 3.42GHz | Abit IP35 Pro | GeIL 4GB DDR2
Gainward BLISS GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB 770/1920/1070
Creative Audigy 2ZS on Logitech Z-680s
Yuraku 24" Widescreen monitor

It saddens me that I need the following to post here:

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in the above post under the psuedonym "sytaylor" are entirely subjective and do not reflect the views of any business, company or entity associated with Simon Taylor. The use, copying of or editing of any materials within this post for professional purposes without written permission is stricly prohibitted under the UK Right of Privacy as provided in the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights: Article 10 ECHR. Any attempt to use the information herin shall be subject to the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information act, with damages being saught for defamation. This disclaimer applies to all text, images or media on this domain.

You have been warned.
My Blog
sytaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 03:52 PM   #843
Delbert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Station X
Posts: 517
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=13174473
16499....
GPU 800/2050/2200 .... noticed that the core clock means nothing if you cannot push the shaders.... probably why they are linked....
CPU... cannot get past 3.6G stable.... poor memory letting me down went for these... http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...-086-OC&tool=3... and they wont go past 400 for anything, unless i up to volts to crazy levels.... just not worth it. should have gone for some 8500 units, but there are lot more bucks.... oh well

Anyway... back down to CPU 3.2G, GPU 720/1800/2000 ... still crushes all games....
__________________
Q6600@3.6G (1.35v), 480 SoC (870/2000), 4Gig Mem, Abit IP35 Pro, Corsair HX620, 1x250Gig (OS), 2x250Gig (Games), P182. Win7... 290.53... http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/
Delbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 06:51 PM   #844
methimpikehoses
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Delbert, which GTS 512 do you have?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 06:57 PM   #845
Delbert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Station X
Posts: 517
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Gainward BLISS 8800GTS.
Think there is more left in it, but pretty pointless if i cannot get the CPU past 3.6G.
As i said .... eats all games for breakfast.... and its nice and cool and quiet.
Will post a pic in the 2008 rigs section when i can find my camera....
__________________
Q6600@3.6G (1.35v), 480 SoC (870/2000), 4Gig Mem, Abit IP35 Pro, Corsair HX620, 1x250Gig (OS), 2x250Gig (Games), P182. Win7... 290.53... http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/
Delbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 06:59 PM   #846
methimpikehoses
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delbert
Gainward BLISS 8800GTS.
Think there is more left in it, but pretty pointless if i cannot get the CPU past 3.6G.
As i said .... eats all games for breakfast.... and its nice and cool and quiet.
Will post a pic in the 2008 rigs section when i can find my camera....
Nice. How does it react when you serve Crysis for breakfast?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 07:27 PM   #847
Delbert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Station X
Posts: 517
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Not really played Crysis much.... tried the demo.... but waiting for the first patch before buying.... besides, there is so much else to catch up on ( Orange box/stalker/oblivion/COD4/Qwars/witcher/silent hunter 4 etc ).
When i did try the demo, i ran it at 1600x1200 with a very high carvs pack ( this one http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...postcount=2957 ) and it never dropped below 25 fps... looked absolutely stunning.
Might consider running a Crysis bench on it.... what are the standard settings ?
__________________
Q6600@3.6G (1.35v), 480 SoC (870/2000), 4Gig Mem, Abit IP35 Pro, Corsair HX620, 1x250Gig (OS), 2x250Gig (Games), P182. Win7... 290.53... http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/
Delbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-08, 10:22 PM   #848
sytaylor
Cerebral Barbarian
 
sytaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1,656
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delbert
Gainward BLISS 8800GTS.
Think there is more left in it, but pretty pointless if i cannot get the CPU past 3.6G.
As i said .... eats all games for breakfast.... and its nice and cool and quiet.
Will post a pic in the 2008 rigs section when i can find my camera....
We have almost the same rig. Spooky.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 @ 3.42GHz | Abit IP35 Pro | GeIL 4GB DDR2
Gainward BLISS GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB 770/1920/1070
Creative Audigy 2ZS on Logitech Z-680s
Yuraku 24" Widescreen monitor

It saddens me that I need the following to post here:

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in the above post under the psuedonym "sytaylor" are entirely subjective and do not reflect the views of any business, company or entity associated with Simon Taylor. The use, copying of or editing of any materials within this post for professional purposes without written permission is stricly prohibitted under the UK Right of Privacy as provided in the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights: Article 10 ECHR. Any attempt to use the information herin shall be subject to the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information act, with damages being saught for defamation. This disclaimer applies to all text, images or media on this domain.

You have been warned.
My Blog
sytaylor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-08, 07:20 AM   #849
Delbert
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Station X
Posts: 517
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by methimpikehoses
Nice. How does it react when you serve Crysis for breakfast?
Did some benches using the demo @ the clocks above.... standard seems to be all set high except post processing set to medium. ( no carv mods )
1280x1024
Click image for larger version

Name:	crysis_bench_1280x1024.JPG
Views:	216
Size:	69.6 KB
ID:	29744
1600x1200
Click image for larger version

Name:	crysis_bench_1600x1200.JPG
Views:	219
Size:	68.3 KB
ID:	29745
filtering left at default quality mode in drivers CP.

Any good ?
__________________
Q6600@3.6G (1.35v), 480 SoC (870/2000), 4Gig Mem, Abit IP35 Pro, Corsair HX620, 1x250Gig (OS), 2x250Gig (Games), P182. Win7... 290.53... http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/
Delbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-08, 12:22 PM   #850
methimpikehoses
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delbert
Did some benches using the demo @ the clocks above.... standard seems to be all set high except post processing set to medium. ( no carv mods )
1280x1024
Attachment 29744
1600x1200
Attachment 29745
filtering left at default quality mode in drivers CP.

Any good ?
Assuming it's DX9 mode, pretty good. If it's DX10, I'd say it's great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-08, 04:55 AM   #851
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

21,950 So close to 22K but couldn 't do it

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4633879
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-08, 05:14 AM   #852
grey_1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by jAkUp
21,950 So close to 22K but couldn 't do it

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4633879
I'm sure you'll find a way.

I don't understand your cpu scores..or maybe I just don't get how they work.

1.954 and 2.874 FPS? LoL, what do you need to hit 5 fps?
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 09:00 PM
nForce2 "First Look" and fly-by benchmark GamblerFEXonlin Feedback Forum 4 10-01-02 08:48 PM
UT2003 Demo Benchmark info Gargr Gaming Central 28 09-21-02 08:48 PM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-31-02 12:02 AM
AMD 2400+ and 2600+ Benchmark Extrapolations savyj CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 2 08-17-02 10:32 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.