Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-08, 11:39 AM   #925
FearMeAll
 
FearMeAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 827
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revs
Grats on the new rig, bud. These GX2's are CPU limited at low res's. If you run a test at your max res I bet you lose almost no points. Give it a go and post back. Also, some pics would be nice in the 'Post your rig' thread
sure will my friend..having issues with my ram though...I have some boot problems every now and then and whenever I remove the second 2 gig stick all of my problems go away...hate that...gonna see if there is a bios update because this problem happens no matter what low clocks I set it at. My mobo may have a problem with the patriot extreme ram. It is rated to run at 1600mhz at 7-7-7-20 at 1.9 volts. stays cool at that voltage.
BTW running at 1600mhz FSB now..stable.
Gotta get my camera back so I can take pics of this rig..
gonna run 3dmark with this 1600mhz FSB now..the motherboard is rated to run at that and I just turned it up there.
still at 4ghz though- that's enough for God's sake.
edit- Think I found the problem!The sticks are rated at 7-7-7-20 and one of the sticks works fine at this but the other does not so I just relaxed the timings a hair and it seems to have resolved the issue.
Now running 1600mhz ram in sync mode with the FSB which is also at 1600mhz...sweet! gonna run some benchies!!
__________________
Consoles: Xbox Elite with HDDVD drive and PS3.
Screen:
Panasonic AX200U Widescreen Projector (1280x720), 160" HighPower Screen, AND A BIG COUCH.
[FONT="Courier New"] HTPC: Intel Wolfdale 3ghz, 4 gigs DDR2 800 ram, 500gig HDD, Craptastic 7600GS, Windows 7 32bit, XBMC installed [/FONT] :D
[B]My Video Encoding/Office rig:[/B] [I] Intel QX9650 @ 3ghz, 1333mhz FSB, 4gigs Patriot Extreme DDR3 @ 1333mhz, XFX 790i 3-way Sli mobo, Xf-Fi Extreme Gamer, 400watt Fanless Power Supply, 9500GT 64-bit bus(ouch!), 8.750TB HDD, Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate. [B][FONT="Arial Narrow"]Everything at stock and completely boring..[/FONT][/B][/I] :type:
FearMeAll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-08, 04:49 AM   #926
CapnKirk
Registered User
 
CapnKirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 196
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6009853
__________________
MODIFICATION: PROJECT BLACKBIRD-003 DEFIANT EDITION™

Defiant Modification Solutions™
Defying Murphy's Law



"Show me, Don't tell me!"
CapnKirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-08, 05:55 PM   #927
qube
Bored sins birth
 
qube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GBG Sweden
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Elmor, Kinc breaks 3DMark 06 word record with ASUS EAH3870X2 TOP and ASUS P5E64 WS Pro 32601

Elmor and Kinc have been spending the weekend benching with ASUS' latest hardware and with the help of some exotic cooling, they were been able to move the bar another notch. With two ASUS EAH3870X2 TOP, which sports two AMD RV670 circuits on one PCB, they had four graphics cores working together to break the world record. In the end they were able to reach 32,601 points. They used ASUS recently launched P5E64 WS Pro motherboard along with an Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650, C1 stepping, cooled by some liquid nitrogen.

The processor was overclocked to a mere 5.719GHz, which is 100MHz less than the previous world record, but still enough for them to break it. The graphics cards were overclocked to 990MHz, while the real key was the memory overclock that reached 1125MHz, much thanks to the 0.8ns Qimonda chips using ASUS' in-house design. The cards were air-cooled.

Unfortunately, the ORB doesn't accept the C1 stepping, which means the score can't be published there yet. We expect Futuremark to update the ORB with support as soon as possible. Until then you will have to settle for pictures of the system and the screenshot confirming the score.

Update: Futuremark has fixed the ORB. You can find the scored HERE.



http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7604.html
__________________
qube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-08, 09:52 PM   #928
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

My latest score on the 1337 PC (see sig) is 13320
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 10:04 AM   #929
Zapablast05
ZapaFAILmaster of Merwang
 
Zapablast05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 3,131
Send a message via AIM to Zapablast05
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

16,940
http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=14
It's only gonna get better.

__________________

Xbox Live: Zapablast05 click!|3DMark06: 17,001|
PSN: Zapablast05
Originally Posted by crainger: "Come meet my son Zapablast05"
Originally Posted by crainger: A truck wont get the pussy zapa has become accustomed to.
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL: In fact, I measure years in BC and AC (before Camp0rz and after Camp0rz).
I don't want to get you drunk, but, ah, that's a very fine Chardonnay you're not drinking.
Zapablast05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 10:26 AM   #930
Amuro
Newtype Ace
 
Amuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,206
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Why are you running your memory at 4-4-4-7? tRAS should never be less than the sum of CAS Latency + tRCD +2.
__________________
Lian Li Armorsuit PC-P80 Black | Intel Core i7-3960X @4.3Ghz | Asus Rampage IV Extreme | G.SKILL Ripjaws X 4 x 4GB @1866Mhz CL9 |eVGA GTX 690 Hydro Copper | Cruscial M4 512GB SATA III SSD | WD VelociRaptor 300GB | Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ 1TB | Pioneer BDR-205BK 12x Blu-ray Burner | Creative x-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Sound Card | Corsair A1200 1200W PSU

Water cooled by Koolance ERM-3K3UC Cooling System
Amuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 12:52 PM   #931
Zapablast05
ZapaFAILmaster of Merwang
 
Zapablast05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 3,131
Send a message via AIM to Zapablast05
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Why not? I'm not experiencing any problems that I can see. The lower it is, the faster the rows are.
__________________

Xbox Live: Zapablast05 click!|3DMark06: 17,001|
PSN: Zapablast05
Originally Posted by crainger: "Come meet my son Zapablast05"
Originally Posted by crainger: A truck wont get the pussy zapa has become accustomed to.
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL: In fact, I measure years in BC and AC (before Camp0rz and after Camp0rz).
I don't want to get you drunk, but, ah, that's a very fine Chardonnay you're not drinking.
Zapablast05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 09:27 PM   #932
mythy
Single Male
 
mythy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amuro
Why are you running your memory at 4-4-4-7? tRAS should never be less than the sum of CAS Latency + tRCD +2.

could you please explain this to me in detail? I am very interested in this topic to say the least
__________________

---Q6600 @3.45 430FSB - P5K Deluxe---
---1066 5-4-4-12 PL6! - 257 GTX OCed---
---ASUS Xonar DX - Dell 2407 24 LCD---
mythy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-10-08, 09:31 PM   #933
Zapablast05
ZapaFAILmaster of Merwang
 
Zapablast05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 3,131
Send a message via AIM to Zapablast05
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by mythy
could you please explain this to me in detail? I am very interested in this topic to say the least
Supposedly your tRAS timing is supposed to be the sum of your CAS latency, tRCD, plus 2. I never heard of it. All I know is that the tighter the tRAS, the better the performance, but if it's too tight, the memory cycle will finish too soon and become unstable. I don't know where the plus 2 came from either.
__________________

Xbox Live: Zapablast05 click!|3DMark06: 17,001|
PSN: Zapablast05
Originally Posted by crainger: "Come meet my son Zapablast05"
Originally Posted by crainger: A truck wont get the pussy zapa has become accustomed to.
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL: In fact, I measure years in BC and AC (before Camp0rz and after Camp0rz).
I don't want to get you drunk, but, ah, that's a very fine Chardonnay you're not drinking.
Zapablast05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 11:12 PM   #934
Amuro
Newtype Ace
 
Amuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,206
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by mythy
could you please explain this to me in detail? I am very interested in this topic to say the least
this article explains it:
http://www.lostcircuits.com/memory/ocz3700/3.shtml
__________________
Lian Li Armorsuit PC-P80 Black | Intel Core i7-3960X @4.3Ghz | Asus Rampage IV Extreme | G.SKILL Ripjaws X 4 x 4GB @1866Mhz CL9 |eVGA GTX 690 Hydro Copper | Cruscial M4 512GB SATA III SSD | WD VelociRaptor 300GB | Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ 1TB | Pioneer BDR-205BK 12x Blu-ray Burner | Creative x-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Sound Card | Corsair A1200 1200W PSU

Water cooled by Koolance ERM-3K3UC Cooling System
Amuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 11:15 PM   #935
Amuro
Newtype Ace
 
Amuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,206
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapablast05
Supposedly your tRAS timing is supposed to be the sum of your CAS latency, tRCD, plus 2. I never heard of it. All I know is that the tighter the tRAS, the better the performance, but if it's too tight, the memory cycle will finish too soon and become unstable. I don't know where the plus 2 came from either.
tRAS setting too tight would cause HDD corruption and performance loss.
__________________
Lian Li Armorsuit PC-P80 Black | Intel Core i7-3960X @4.3Ghz | Asus Rampage IV Extreme | G.SKILL Ripjaws X 4 x 4GB @1866Mhz CL9 |eVGA GTX 690 Hydro Copper | Cruscial M4 512GB SATA III SSD | WD VelociRaptor 300GB | Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ 1TB | Pioneer BDR-205BK 12x Blu-ray Burner | Creative x-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Sound Card | Corsair A1200 1200W PSU

Water cooled by Koolance ERM-3K3UC Cooling System
Amuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-08, 11:18 PM   #936
Zapablast05
ZapaFAILmaster of Merwang
 
Zapablast05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 3,131
Send a message via AIM to Zapablast05
Default Re: 3DMark06 Benchmark Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amuro
tRAS setting too tight would cause HDD corruption and performance loss.
HDD corruption? Now that's something I never heard of. Now, the performance loss would be...BSODS because RAM cycles are closed too soon before they even start. I don't know about the HDD though.
__________________

Xbox Live: Zapablast05 click!|3DMark06: 17,001|
PSN: Zapablast05
Originally Posted by crainger: "Come meet my son Zapablast05"
Originally Posted by crainger: A truck wont get the pussy zapa has become accustomed to.
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL: In fact, I measure years in BC and AC (before Camp0rz and after Camp0rz).
I don't want to get you drunk, but, ah, that's a very fine Chardonnay you're not drinking.
Zapablast05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 08:00 PM
nForce2 "First Look" and fly-by benchmark GamblerFEXonlin Feedback Forum 4 10-01-02 07:48 PM
UT2003 Demo Benchmark info Gargr Gaming Central 28 09-21-02 07:48 PM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-30-02 11:02 PM
AMD 2400+ and 2600+ Benchmark Extrapolations savyj CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 2 08-17-02 09:32 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.