CPUMark99 - how do you compare - Page 5

centvalny · 02-09-09, 03:53 AM

AMD PII X4 940 with Windows 7

4 cpumarks ran simultaneously to 100% load at 4 cores...

centvalny · 02-09-09, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T.h.o.m.a.s.

its not a good way to measure performance of current cpu's because this benchmark only uses one thread so the score isnt quite accurate

Run 2 or 4 cpumarks (depend on cpu) at the same instance.

fuelrod · 02-12-09, 06:05 PM

That's a lot higher than I expected for a Phenom II. Is that overclock you got more the exception or the rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by centvalny

AMD PII X4 940 with Windows 7

4 cpumarks ran simultaneously to 100% load at 4 cores...

centvalny · 02-14-09, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuelrod

That's a lot higher than I expected for a Phenom II. Is that overclock you got more the exception or the rule?

Its possible with single stage cooling @ -30C on cpu.

centvalny · 02-14-09, 01:23 PM

Nice run with I7 there moorfang

Gregor976 · 05-14-11, 10:15 AM

Single thread bench I know, but:

That's two images together because I couldn't get print screen to capture when it was running for some reason.

Blacklash · 06-06-11, 03:58 PM

I get 616 with my old first rev i7 920. OC is in my sig.

ViN86 · 06-06-11, 04:06 PM

It's not completely irrelevant to perform this test. It is interesting to see how CPU's have improved in terms of efficiency on a single thread basis. Parallel performance comparisons to older CPU's aren't really relevant.

fuelrod · 07-02-11, 11:12 PM

OFFICIALLY UPDATED LIST

Thanks to everyone who has submitted to this post; it been interesting watching all the scores come in over the years. I decided to update the list with system scores I have collected since the original post. For those who say the benchmark is invalid on today's processors, I can tell you several years back I started running the multi-threaded CPU benchmark Cinebench after I run the CPUmark99 test. For the most part the CPU's maintain there same rankings. Keep them coming ....

**mullet** · 07-03-11, 12:31 AM

i7-2600k stock 3.4

**mullet** · 07-03-11, 12:39 AM

i7-2600k @ 4.4

**AdamK47** · 07-15-11, 07:35 PM

980X @ 4.4GHz

Edit: Uploaded directly to nvnews.

02-09-09, 03:53 AM	#49
centvalny Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 46	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare AMD PII X4 940 with Windows 7 4 cpumarks ran simultaneously to 100% load at 4 cores...

02-14-09, 01:23 PM	#53
centvalny Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 46	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare Nice run with I7 there moorfang

05-14-11, 10:15 AM	#54
Gregor976 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Orlando Posts: 183	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare Single thread bench I know, but: That's two images together because I couldn't get print screen to capture when it was running for some reason.

06-06-11, 03:58 PM	#55
Blacklash 8^9^3 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Old Vizima Posts: 3,679	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare I get 616 with my old first rev i7 920. OC is in my sig. __________________ Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)\|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB) ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)\|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980\|4604)\|ASUS PA246Q WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)\|Pioneer DVR-2920Q\|LG GH22LS30\|Klipsch PM20 2.0 SilverStone OP1000-E\|SilverStone TJ10-B\|Thermalright U-120 Extreme\|Win 7 HP x64

06-06-11, 04:06 PM	#56
ViN86 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,486	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare It's not completely irrelevant to perform this test. It is interesting to see how CPU's have improved in terms of efficiency on a single thread basis. Parallel performance comparisons to older CPU's aren't really relevant.

07-02-11, 11:12 PM	#57
fuelrod Registered User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Houston Posts: 140	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare OFFICIALLY UPDATED LIST Thanks to everyone who has submitted to this post; it been interesting watching all the scores come in over the years. I decided to update the list with system scores I have collected since the original post. For those who say the benchmark is invalid on today's processors, I can tell you several years back I started running the multi-threaded CPU benchmark Cinebench after I run the CPUmark99 test. For the most part the CPU's maintain there same rankings. Keep them coming .... __________________ i7 2600K @ 4.6 Ghz, Gigabyte Z68, 16GB Crucial DDR3 PC3-1600, EVGA GTX 670 FTW, SB X-fi

07-03-11, 12:31 AM	#58
mullet Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 8,011	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare i7-2600k stock 3.4 __________________ • LIAN-LI PC-A70B • ASUS MAXIMUS V FORMULA (0701) • i7-3770k + NOCTUA\|NH-D14 • Intel 520 240GB SSD • G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB DDR3 1600 • • EVGA GeForce GTX 680 • PCP&C 750 Quad • ASUS 12x BD-ROM • DELL U2412M E-IPS • Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 • Logitech Z5500 5.1 • Last edited by mullet; 07-19-11 at 09:50 AM.

07-03-11, 12:39 AM	#59
mullet Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 8,011	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare i7-2600k @ 4.4 __________________ • LIAN-LI PC-A70B • ASUS MAXIMUS V FORMULA (0701) • i7-3770k + NOCTUA\|NH-D14 • Intel 520 240GB SSD • G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB DDR3 1600 • • EVGA GeForce GTX 680 • PCP&C 750 Quad • ASUS 12x BD-ROM • DELL U2412M E-IPS • Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 • Logitech Z5500 5.1 • Last edited by mullet; 04-02-13 at 10:39 PM.

07-15-11, 07:35 PM	#60
AdamK47 Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Cinci, OH Posts: 984	Re: CPUMark99 - how do you compare 980X @ 4.4GHz Edit: Uploaded directly to nvnews. Attached Thumbnails