Go Back   nV News Forums > Graphics Card Forums > NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-17-02, 03:05 AM   #1
JohnsonLKD
Henry stauf
 
JohnsonLKD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC
Posts: 88
Default PS 1.4 supported?

Pixel Shader 1.4...

If the rage3d people were correct...

what video card will support it? 8500? 9000? 9700?

They said GF 4 can't support PS 1.4!!!

I thought Adanced PS was PS1.4!!!
JohnsonLKD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 03:27 AM   #2
-=DVS=-
.:. Lafiel .:.
 
-=DVS=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
Default

PS 1.4 only for Radeon 8500 maybe for 9000 to dunno about that but 9700 supports PS 2.0

Dunno about Nvidia don't realy give a damn, no games to play with
__________________
.:. Lian Li X500FX .:. i7 2600k .:. PNY GTX 680 .:. Corsair DDR3 8GB .:. Silverstone 800W PSU .:. Asus P8P67-M Pro .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
-=DVS=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 05:08 AM   #3
Uttar
Registered User
 
Uttar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,354
Send a message via AIM to Uttar Send a message via Yahoo to Uttar
Default

Rage3D are ATI fans, so they'll say that useless, crappy features ATI got and nVidia doesn't are "the greatest thing ever".

nVNews is a little like that too, in my opinion a little less ( because nVidia does less crappy things probably ) , but that's not the point here.

PS 1.4 is ONLY supported in the Radeon 8500 and Radeon 9000. The Radeon 9700 and 9500 supports 2.0 ( and that means it also supports 1.4, but that's not so important to mention )

PS 1.4 being not supported by nVidia ( they say they've yet to see an effect needing 1.4 ) , very few developers use it.


In other words, no, GF4s do not support PS 1.4, but it's ridiculous to want that because nearly no games support it.


Uttar
Uttar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 05:25 AM   #4
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

add to that mix that no other vendor supports it yet including Matrox, SiS, and as far as i know Trident. although i hear Trident is supposed to be DX9 so i guess it might have backwards compatibility.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 07:52 AM   #5
JohnsonLKD
Henry stauf
 
JohnsonLKD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC
Posts: 88
Default well, it's just feeling...

That I have another supported function...

Well, thank you for those "I-will-let-you-know-noob!" replys.

Then I just wonder what is that adv. PS then?

hmmm...
JohnsonLKD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 08:16 AM   #6
Renzo
The Terminator
 
Renzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Funland
Posts: 181
Default

If you're referring to 3dmark2001's "advanced pixel shader", then yes it means pixel shader version 1.4. However, if you read the 3dmark documents, you'll find out that "advanced pixel shader" test can be done using pixel shader version 1.3, but in two passes.

For your knowledge, there are some effects IMPOSSIBLE to do with PS1.3, but they can be done using PS1.4.
__________________
Desire is irrelevant, I am a machine
Renzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 09:40 AM   #7
SavagePaladin
info*****
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,395
Default

I'm of the opinion that the reason gf4s didn't have ps1.4 is because they'd been reworking the same architecture a little too long. Anyone can tell you modifying an existing design eventually sucks more than making a new one
SavagePaladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 09:42 AM   #8
saturnotaku
Apple user. Deal with it.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,502
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Renzo
For your knowledge, there are some effects IMPOSSIBLE to do with PS1.3, but they can be done using PS1.4.
Right.

Again to echo what everyone else has said, you can probably count on one hand the number of games on store shelves that utilize any form of pixel shader at all, much less the highly touted PS 1.4.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-02, 10:32 AM   #9
DIMA
Registered User
 
DIMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 78
Send a message via ICQ to DIMA
Default

I've seen a few notes that GF4TI core HAS the potential to support PS 1.4 but this potential is untapped and will most definetely not be ever tapped, since it would be politically incorrect to follow ATI and suddenly implement PS 1.4 in NV28 for example. Imagine what the critics would say about nvidia following ati's path! The same can be said about N-Patches, that GF4TI doesn't support while the R8500 does, why? cause it's again politically incorrect to follow ATI and besides, nvidia doesn't see any use in them for the long run... (referring to N-patches and PS 1.4).
__________________
P4 2ghz
512mb RDRAM
GF4 TI4600
DIMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 11:08 AM   #10
john19055
 
john19055's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: GREENVILLE,TX
Posts: 3,859
Default

Well the NV30 and the R9700 and a few other companies will all support the PS2.0 witch this will be great for software makers that makes games so they don't have to program for two different kinds of shaders.
john19055 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 04:51 PM   #11
Renzo
The Terminator
 
Renzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Funland
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by saturnotaku


Right.

Again to echo what everyone else has said, you can probably count on one hand the number of games on store shelves that utilize any form of pixel shader at all, much less the highly touted PS 1.4.
There are probably... eh.. zero PS1.4 supporting games Anyway, the point is even R8500 have more complete pixel shader than GF4 does. No matter if it's currently unsupported, but it is still missing and fanATIcs can boast with that.
__________________
Desire is irrelevant, I am a machine
Renzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-02, 05:56 PM   #12
Chalnoth
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,293
Default

I don't believe that the GeForce4 architecture can, in any way, support PS1.4. If it could, you had better believe that not only would they support it, but the added functionality would be exposed in OpenGL (In particular, GF4 architecture can only support up to four textures per pass, and in a less flexible fashion than is available in PS 1.4).

Regardless, the reality of the situation appears to be this:

1. PS 1.4 offers one additional real-world improvement: overbright lights. The DOOM3 engine supports these, but apparently the designers aren't taking advantage of them (JC is attempting to push the designers to go for it...). While the overbright lights will be visible on all hardware, there will likely be visible banding on DX7/DX8 hardware. What PS 1.4 offers is much better accuracy under these situations.

2. PS 1.4's larger texture addressing flexibility and larger number of textures allow the same effects to be done in fewer passes. This is the primary situation where we'll see PS 1.4 used. What this translatest to is that PS 1.4 will be used to make the same effects run faster on a Radeon 8500. However, in the real world, it still cannot outpace a GeForce4 Ti in these situations (i.e. the benefit is nowhere near as great as you'd think given the use of only one pass, as opposed to the 2-3 used on the GF3/4 hardware).

What this appears to translate to is that there is really little reason to go for PS 1.4. The performance alone will speak of 99% of the improvement that you'll see from it, and current data indicates that it won't help the Radeon 8500 out that much. Secondly, the only practical visual improvement that we've seen come forward is a big "if" that may never be realized.
Chalnoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
X Failed to load NVdriver c00lr4c3r NVIDIA Linux 13 10-22-02 02:44 PM
Error messages... HELP!!!! Imperito NVIDIA Linux 3 09-24-02 11:46 PM
GForce drivers installed...but dont work tomfullery NVIDIA Linux 6 09-22-02 09:23 AM
Need help to get the X to work on my Acer TravelMate 630 knchee NVIDIA Linux 16 09-19-02 11:16 PM
NVIDIA drivers and linux-2.5.31 eltarvag NVIDIA Linux 6 08-14-02 03:19 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.