Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux


Sponsored Ad

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-06, 01:35 PM   #1
kwizart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 79
Default What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

I've notice a new file appear in the 97xx series (that enable support for G80)
Does this file is usefull for chipset older than G80?
What is the aim of this file?
This file seems to have an SONAME but is it usefull for devel purpose?

Bonnes fètes de fin d'année!
happy new year!

Nicolas (kwizart)
kwizart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-06, 03:23 PM   #2
zander
NVIDIA Corporation
 
zander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,661
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

The new library is a libwfb.so replacement for GeForce 8800 GPUs; it is only used by the X driver.
zander is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Ads - Guests Only

Old 12-28-06, 05:12 PM   #3
kwizart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 79
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

Do this file can be placed elsewhere for exemple /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extension/nvidia assuming that it will be found by it SONAME?

You mean the X driver use it so it is not necessary to make some special tweak in the xorg.conf? And also that the library will be use if the driver detect the necessary hardware ?
kwizart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-06, 11:16 AM   #4
AaronP
NVIDIA Corporation
 
AaronP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,164
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

The file can be placed anywhere, as long as the X server can find it (either through the ModulePath directive or via a symlink). The SONAME is not used. The driver will automatically try to load a module called "wfb" (i.e., libwfb.so), which is installed as a symlink to libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z if no libwfb.so existed at install time.

The driver will always try to load it, but it will only be required if a GeForce 8800 or higher is detected.
AaronP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 05:42 PM   #5
mtrax
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

I'm using the atrpms package for nvidia 9764 and I'm getting errors finding wfb but I have a 6200 TC card, so I assume this is not a problem, but should this library still exist? ie is this a packaging problem or a configuration problem for me?

Quote:
(II) Loading sub module "wfb"
(II) LoadModule: "wfb"
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module wfb
(II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
(EE) Failed to load module "wfb" (module does not exist, 0)
mtrax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 07:08 PM   #6
zander
NVIDIA Corporation
 
zander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,661
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

It should still be present, but since it's a new file, some third-party packages do not include it, yet.
zander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 09:54 PM   #7
thimm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

Hi,

this has been filed at ATrpms as http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1087

The issue is more with 3rd party packages trying to emulate the work of nvidia-installer and therefore missing some new development. I'm currently ripping out the Makefile based builds in order to use nvidia-installer calls (and therefore "never" miss any such changes again).

Sorry for the breakage, the fix will be available soon.
thimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 11:33 PM   #8
mtrax
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

no problems thanks anyway..
mtrax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-07, 04:44 AM   #9
thimm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

OK, I updated the packages on ATrpms for FC5+6+7 including cubbi's suspend2 series and RHEL3+4. Please give them a try, I don't have any 8800 to try it with.
thimm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-07, 05:01 AM   #10
kwizart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 79
Default Re: What about libnvidia-wfb.so ?

Depending where the libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z is installed (by third part repositories) it has to be symlink. It seems to work fine like this:

ln -s libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z usr/lib/xorg/modules/extension/nvidia/libwfb.so

libwfb.so do not seems to exist on Fedora Core 6, so there is no replacement tweak at this time.

Since this version drop support of NV30 and older we need to do another "legacy" version for aiglx with NV30 and older.
The usual legacy version is still usefull for DGA server and is used by some (fews) app like tv software (xdtv..., mayve xawtv?)
kwizart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Most Popular NVIDIA Based Graphics Cards


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
nV News - Copyright ©1998-2010. All rights reserved.