Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > CPUs, Motherboards And Memory

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-07, 04:54 AM   #13
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Sounds interesting... I think...

Heh, architecture doesn't really mean anything to me. If its faster than Core 2, stable, runs cool, and is well priced, I'll buy one.
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 08:46 AM   #14
shadow001
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,526
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL
Sounds interesting... I think...

Heh, architecture doesn't really mean anything to me. If its faster than Core 2, stable, runs cool, and is well priced, I'll buy one.

Or 2 Quad core barcelonas since my board supports them right off the bat....
shadow001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 09:32 AM   #15
nekrosoft13
I'm Geralt
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicagoland, once a year in Poland
Posts: 24,366
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by a12ctic
Yeah, mabye, but AMD completly dominates the server market, the opterons are still better than the c2d based Xeons. The mobile market will pick up with the new chips too.
your amd fanboyism is so pathethic

Quote:
The Woodcrest platform performed very well, exceeding our initial expectations. It is the fastest in all of the tests and completely dominates our benchmarks. The new Xeon 5100 series helps Intel to get back on track, providing class-leading server/workstation processors. The now older 5000-series (Dempsey) Xeon, based on the Netburst architecture, is often last in the competition and merely serves as a point of reference in our tests.

Intel has retaken the throne from AMD in the server/workstation sector and sent AMD back to the drawing board. Next month Intel will release the quad core Clovertown CPU with 2 combined Woodcrest cores. AMD is ready for this threat with the introduction of their X4 Opteron, which is reported to have a L3 cache. Servers will benefit more from these quad core processors than desktop users due to the limited deployment of multithreaded-capable applications in the desktop sector in comparison to the server sector.

In mid-2007 AMD is expected to answer Intel's new threat with a line of faster Opterons utilizing the new Socket F, as well as support for DDR2 memory.
Quote:
The Intel Xeon 5160, a.k.a. Woodcrest, will simply be the most powerful server CPU this year (though it's not yet available for purchase of course). As our extrapolated calculations show, even a 2.6 GHz Woodcrest will outperform the current Opteron 285 with a 5 to 55% margin, nothing short of impressive.
Quote:
On average, the new Xeon offers the best performance per Watt: it is almost 93% more than the Netburst-based Dempsey, 43% more than the AMD Opteron, and 74% more than the Sun UltraSparc T1. Although these figures are not representative for all the various servers and applications, we can conclude hat Woodcrest is quite an efficient chip, which seems to be hardly bothered by its external memory controller and warmer FB-DIMM modules at the system level. The average performance gains of 23% to 31% above the competition further add to the good impression that the CPU makes
Quote:
Here, too, things do not look too bright for AMD. For every Opteron one can find a similarly or lower priced Woodcrest, that is faster and/or more energy efficient.
do you want more?
__________________
Windows 8 the next big failure, right after Windows ME
nekrosoft13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 09:32 AM   #16
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by |MaguS|
blah blah blah

I want to see real performance numbers before even thinking about getting it. Core 2 is out and has proven itself... time for AMD to step up or shut up.
you have a problem with ****ing on everything AMD does.

two years ago, i bet you had your tongue up their ass, now you just trash them. they will rise again, and they will fall again. its just how the industry works. theres no need to take a giant dump on everything they try to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeemed
Sounds awesome. Maybe I should hold off on that quad-core Core2 rig. Then again, if I'm understanding that article correctly neither AMD nor Intel intend to have a specific architecture for very long. Meaning sockets could be changing more rapidly as well.
me too. but if it doesnt pan out so well, my C2D rig will become a reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL
Sounds interesting... I think...

Heh, architecture doesn't really mean anything to me. If its faster than Core 2, stable, runs cool, and is well priced, I'll buy one.
yes, this is how it should be. but its funny to watch the hypocrisy of the ex-AMD fanboys that jumped ship. i dont care about the company name, so im not going to crap on them before i see results.

on a different note, i am excited to see how this turns out. the SSE128 execution looks awesome. also interested to see how their bottleneck cuts will payoff (if they payoff).
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 12:17 PM   #17
stevemedes
Intel Virgin
 
stevemedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,716
Send a message via AIM to stevemedes
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Bah, no need to argue. This is actually my first Intel rig I've EVER built. I've had Cyrix 333, K6-2 400, K6-2 450, Duron 600, Duron 800, Tbird 1.0, Tbird 1.2, Athlon XP 2800, Athlon 64 2800, Athlon 64 X2 3800 and now C2D. If I see that AMD regains the upper hand, guess what I'll buy? in the meantime I hope AMD the best, as I'll always have a special place in my heart for them
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6400 | Asus P5B Deluxe w/ Thermalright HR-09 | 4gb Crucial BallistiX Tracer PC2-8000 | eVGA 9800 GTX | Tuniq Tower
2x36gb WD Raptor RAID-0 | 750gb WD SE16 | Samsung SH-S203B | X-Fi XtremeMusic | Corsair VX550
Coolermaster Stacker 832 | Klipsch Promedia 2.1
stevemedes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 12:45 PM   #18
J-Mag
Weapon of MassConsumption
 
J-Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,245
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alaa
Well thats bad news for AMD. Even if they want it to be "open" they should create a branding that signifies this open standard. I don't have any hope for AMD to pull any significant gains in the mobile sector.
J-Mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 02:23 PM   #19
Alaa
Peace
 
Alaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cairo
Posts: 431
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mag
Well thats bad news for AMD. Even if they want it to be "open" they should create a branding that signifies this open standard. I don't have any hope for AMD to pull any significant gains in the mobile sector.
Yes, this is exactly what I thought about! I hope they revise their plans in the future.
Alaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 02:38 PM   #20
Subtestube
Anisymbolic
 
Subtestube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 1,365
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Just a note - yes, Barcelona looks awesome, but for those of you holding off, AMD plan to launch Barcelona based Opteron's first, so if you're looking for Consumer level chips, you'll be waiting until some time in Q3. I guess it depends on how satisfied you are with your current system if you can wait that long, but being realistic, you've probably got almost half a year to wait for "Athlon" level chips (I wonder if they'll change branding?)
__________________
Dr Possible: Core 2 Duo E6400 on Gigabyte GA-965P-DS4. Galaxy GeForce 7600GT. 2GB Corsair XMS 2 DDR2-6400 RAM (CL5). ATi Theatre 550 Pro. Windows XP MCE. All stored in Piano black Antec Sonata II, with a broken door.

Mobile: ASUS M2400N, Pentium M 1.5 GHz. 512 MB DDR RAM. Intel EXTREME graphics. Windows XP SP 2 / Ubuntu 5.10.

Ridiculous DOES not have an 'e' in it. It comes from "ridicule" and has less than nothing to do with the colour red.
Subtestube is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-02-07, 04:27 PM   #21
Redeemed
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,982
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

I just got this Opty185 based rig up and running. On an ASUS A8N32 SLi Dlx, 2GB DDR500 (soon to be 4GB ) with dual GTSs. I think I could wait.

But, I was wanting to build what will become my primary rig in a few months. This current rig (Opty185) would become my secondary rig. I was originally gonna' go with a Q6600- but maybe I should wait and see if Barcelona will tromp the C2D or not. It wouldn't be much longer of a wait. I guess I'll just have to "cross that bridge when I get there".
Redeemed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 04:57 PM   #22
shadow001
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,526
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

I've been running this AMD QuadFX setup with 2 dual core athlons at 2.6 ghz a piece,4 gigs of DDR 800 ram and a 7950 GX2 card,backed up by 4 10 000 RPM Maxtor atlas scsi hard drives using an adaptec 29320 scsi card,so i'm cool for the time being to say the least....


Fact is,for all practical purposes,the only thing i see changing anytime soon is the video card,since the system will only perform faster as time goes on and more software becomes more multithreaded.....Never mind the fact that i can put 2 Quad core barcelonas later on when they get relatively cheap,as it likely won't be because i need the extra speed anytime soon....


Though even if the barcelonas only match the performance of the C2D at the same clock speed,the system will really be nuts with 8 cores under the hood no matter what....
shadow001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 07:50 PM   #23
walterman
Rayne
 
walterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

I hope it overclocks well too, cause those c2d chips are very good overclockers.
__________________
ASUS Rampage Formula X48 | Xeon 3350 @ 3.6 GHz (450x8/1.26v) | 4x1GB OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 Reaper CL3 @ 900 MHz 3-4-4-15 | 1 x eVGA GTX 285 SSC | 1 x ASUS EN8800GTX (PhysX/CUDA -> Burnt by nVidia 196.75 driver) | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty PCIe | 1 x Intel X25-M G2 80GB | 2 x 750GB WD RE2 7500AYYS SATA2 16MB | Samsung SH-B083L SATA | Enermax Revolution 1250W | Samsung SyncMaster 275T 27" 1920x1200 | Thermaltake Black Armor | BloodRayne 2 FSAA Patch
walterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-07, 08:52 PM   #24
shadow001
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,526
Default Re: Barcelona Architecture: AMD on the Counterattack

Quote:
Originally Posted by walterman
I hope it overclocks well too, cause those c2d chips are very good overclockers.


Honestly,and this is just my opinion of course,with 4 CPU cores in one Die,and given all the changes in the architecture,to make the barcelona chips much better performers,when operating at the same clocks that current athlon chips work at,you'll get a hell of a lot of CPU power under the hood,so the need to overclock a 4 processor system kinda escapes me,as even at stock clocks,the system is waiting for the user most of the time,not the other way around....
shadow001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD FX-8120 Black Edition CPU Review (with Asus M5A99X EVO) News Archived News Items 0 06-21-12 08:30 AM
AMD Gooses the Clocks on 'Bulldozer' Opterons News Archived News Items 0 06-04-12 02:24 PM
New Whitepaper: NVIDIA's Next-Gen CUDA Compute Architecture ' Kepler GK110 News Archived News Items 0 05-18-12 09:30 PM
AMD vs Intel druga runda CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 7 08-20-02 01:09 PM
AMD 333MHz and nForce Speculation TheTaz Rumor Mill 5 08-17-02 11:28 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.