Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-20-07, 04:23 PM   #1
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Unhappy 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

Hi,

I used the 9755 driver for AMD64 a few weeks without trouble, but it fails now after upgrading the system from 2 GB to 4 GB of RAM. Below is my system info and xorg.log:

Linux 2.6.20.4-k8 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:51:39 CEST 2007
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G70 [GeForce 7600 GS] (rev a1)

the offending line is:

(EE) end of block range 0x3ffffff < begin 0xf0000000

Any ideas how to avoid this?



Quote:
X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
Current Operating System: Linux inachos 2.6.20.4-k8 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:51:39 CEST 2007 x86_64
Build Date: 07 March 2007
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Apr 20 10:53:46 2007
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
[...]
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
[...]
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,0392 card 10b0,0403 rev a1 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
[...]
(II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:6:0), (0,2,2), BCTRL: 0x0007 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) nVidia Corporation unknown chipset (0x0392) rev 161, Mem @ 0xf6000000/24, 0xe0000000/28, 0xf5000000/24, I/O @ 0x2000/7
(II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
[0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[b]
[1] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[b]
(II) OS-reported resource ranges:
[0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[b]E(B)
[1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[b]
[2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[b]
[4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[b]
[5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[b]
(EE) end of block range 0x3ffffff < begin 0xf0000000
(II) Active PCI resource ranges:
[0] -1 0 0xf4004000 - 0xf40040ff (0x100) MX[b]
[1] -1 0 0xf4003000 - 0xf4003fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[2] -1 0 0xf4002000 - 0xf4002fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0xf4001000 - 0xf4001fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[4] -1 0 0xf4000000 - 0xf4000fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[5] -1 0 0xf5000000 - 0xf5ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[6] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[b](B)
[7] -1 0 0xf6000000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[8] -1 0 0x00001800 - 0x000018ff (0x100) IX[b]
[9] -1 0 0x00001c00 - 0x00001c7f (0x80) IX[b]
[10] -1 0 0x00001c90 - 0x00001c9f (0x10) IX[b]
[11] -1 0 0x00001ca0 - 0x00001ca3 (0x4) IX[b]
[12] -1 0 0x00001ca8 - 0x00001caf (0x8) IX[b]
[13] -1 0 0x00001ca4 - 0x00001ca7 (0x4) IX[b]
[14] -1 0 0x00001cb0 - 0x00001cb7 (0x8) IX[b]
[15] -1 0 0x00001000 - 0x0000107f (0x80) IX[b]
[16] -1 0 0x00001400 - 0x000014ff (0x100) IX[b]
[17] -1 0 0x00001c80 - 0x00001c8f (0x10) IX[b]
[18] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[19] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[20] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[21] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[22] -1 0 0x00002000 - 0x0000207f (0x80) IX[b](B)
(II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps:
[0] -1 0 0xf4004000 - 0xf40040ff (0x100) MX[b]
[1] -1 0 0xf4003000 - 0xf4003fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[2] -1 0 0xf4002000 - 0xf4002fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0xf4001000 - 0xf4001fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[4] -1 0 0xf4000000 - 0xf4000fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[5] -1 0 0xf5000000 - 0xf5ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[6] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[b](B)
[7] -1 0 0xf6000000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[8] -1 0 0x00001800 - 0x000018ff (0x100) IX[b]
[9] -1 0 0x00001c00 - 0x00001c7f (0x80) IX[b]
[10] -1 0 0x00001c90 - 0x00001c9f (0x10) IX[b]
[11] -1 0 0x00001ca0 - 0x00001ca3 (0x4) IX[b]
[12] -1 0 0x00001ca8 - 0x00001caf (0x8) IX[b]
[13] -1 0 0x00001ca4 - 0x00001ca7 (0x4) IX[b]
[14] -1 0 0x00001cb0 - 0x00001cb7 (0x8) IX[b]
[15] -1 0 0x00001000 - 0x0000107f (0x80) IX[b]
[16] -1 0 0x00001400 - 0x000014ff (0x100) IX[b]
[17] -1 0 0x00001c80 - 0x00001c8f (0x10) IX[b]
[18] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[19] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[20] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[21] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[22] -1 0 0x00002000 - 0x0000207f (0x80) IX[b](B)
(II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI:
[0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[b]E(B)
[1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[b]
[2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[b]
[4] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[b]
[5] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[b]
(II) All system resource ranges:
[0] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[b]E(B)
[1] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[b]
[2] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[b]
[4] -1 0 0xf4004000 - 0xf40040ff (0x100) MX[b]
[5] -1 0 0xf4003000 - 0xf4003fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[6] -1 0 0xf4002000 - 0xf4002fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[7] -1 0 0xf4001000 - 0xf4001fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[8] -1 0 0xf4000000 - 0xf4000fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[9] -1 0 0xf5000000 - 0xf5ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[10] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[b](B)
[11] -1 0 0xf6000000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[12] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[b]
[13] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[b]
[14] -1 0 0x00001800 - 0x000018ff (0x100) IX[b]
[15] -1 0 0x00001c00 - 0x00001c7f (0x80) IX[b]
[16] -1 0 0x00001c90 - 0x00001c9f (0x10) IX[b]
[17] -1 0 0x00001ca0 - 0x00001ca3 (0x4) IX[b]
[18] -1 0 0x00001ca8 - 0x00001caf (0x8) IX[b]
[19] -1 0 0x00001ca4 - 0x00001ca7 (0x4) IX[b]
[20] -1 0 0x00001cb0 - 0x00001cb7 (0x8) IX[b]
[21] -1 0 0x00001000 - 0x0000107f (0x80) IX[b]
[22] -1 0 0x00001400 - 0x000014ff (0x100) IX[b]
[23] -1 0 0x00001c80 - 0x00001c8f (0x10) IX[b]
[24] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[25] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[26] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[27] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[28] -1 0 0x00002000 - 0x0000207f (0x80) IX[b](B)
[...]
(II) LoadModule: "glx"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
(==) AIGLX enabled
(II) Loading extension GLX
[...]
(II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
(II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.9755
Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[...]
(II) LoadModule: "ramdac"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libramdac.so
(II) Module ramdac: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 0.1.0
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0
(II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call:
[...]
(EE) end of block range 0x3ffffff < begin 0xf0000000
(II) resource ranges after probing:
[...]
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(**) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
(==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling RENDER acceleration
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If
(EE) NVIDIA(0): you continue to encounter problems, Please try
(EE) NVIDIA(0): reinstalling the NVIDIA driver.
(II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 7600 GS at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 524288 kBytes
(--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 05.73.22.33.00
(II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 16X
[...]
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
(II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "1600x1200"
(WW) NVIDIA(0): The NVIDIA X driver has encountered too many errors. Falling
(WW) NVIDIA(0): back to legacy PCI mode.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
(II) Loading extension NV-GLX
Attached Files
File Type: log xorg.log (24.9 KB, 74 views)
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-07, 05:46 PM   #2
whig
550Ti
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 854
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

Please run memtest to check ram (a good idea after every ram upgrade).
whig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-07, 07:09 AM   #3
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

The RAM is Ok, because I have two identical machines with 4GB which work flawlessly except for the NVidia driver.

I think the error is raised because all ranges are given (and checked) as 32-Bit unsigned integers which is definitly wrong on a 64-Bit machine!
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-07, 10:11 AM   #4
gilboa
Linux addict...
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 540
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

I assume that you are using a 32bit distribution? (Hence the 32bit base addresses in your Xorg.conf)

What's the output of
$ cat /proc/mtrr
$ cat /proc/meminfo
$ cat /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config | grep HIGHMEM

- Gilboa
__________________
DEV-NG: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX680, F19/x86_64, Dell U2711.
DEV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 5x320GB, GTX550, F19/x86_64, Dell U2711 (^).
SRV: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 4x2TB, 9800GTX, F19/x86-64, Dell U2412.
LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F19/x86_64.
gilboa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-07, 03:10 PM   #5
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

No, (as you can see from the kernel name) this is a full 64 Bit system. All installed packages are compiled for 64 Bit. However the PCI-Bus is 32 Bit by design (unless you have a server board with pci-64).

$ ldd /usr/bin/X
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00002b9406dd0000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)


$ cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
reg01: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
reg02: base=0x120000000 (4608MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
reg03: base=0x80000000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1
reg04: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
reg05: base=0xcff00000 (3327MB), size= 1MB: uncachable, count=1
reg06: base=0xf0000000 (3840MB), size= 64MB: write-combining, count=1

$ cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 4115348 kB
MemFree: 3491092 kB
Buffers: 153912 kB
Cached: 117476 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 183444 kB
Inactive: 107380 kB
SwapTotal: 2915756 kB
SwapFree: 2915756 kB
Dirty: 28 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 19480 kB
Mapped: 10772 kB
Slab: 308272 kB
SReclaimable: 293520 kB
SUnreclaim: 14752 kB
PageTables: 1752 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 4973428 kB
Committed_AS: 61236 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 35088 kB
VmallocChunk: 34359693307 kB

* no HIGHMEM (this is not useful on 64bit)
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-07, 04:47 PM   #6
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

The just released beta driver gives the same errors and does not work, unfortunately.

Quote:
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(**) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
(==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling RENDER acceleration
(II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 7600 GS (G73) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 524288 kBytes
(--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 05.73.22.33.00
(II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 16X
(--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU
(--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce 7600 GS at PCI:1:0:0:
(--) NVIDIA(0): DELL 2001FP (DFP-0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): DELL 2001FP (DFP-0): 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
(--) NVIDIA(0): DELL 2001FP (DFP-0): Internal Dual Link TMDS
(II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: DFP-0
(II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
(II) NVIDIA(0): "1600x1200"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "1280x1024"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600"
(II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1600 x 1200
(++) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (96, 96); computed from -dpi X commandline option
(==) NVIDIA(0): Disabling 32-bit ARGB GLX visuals.
(--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
(II) do I need RAC? No, I don't.
(II) resource ranges after preInit:
[0] 0 0 0xf5000000 - 0xf5ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b]
[1] 0 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[b]
[2] 0 0 0xf6000000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b]
[3] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[b]E(B)
[4] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[b]
[5] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[b]
[6] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[b]
[7] -1 0 0xf4004000 - 0xf40040ff (0x100) MX[b]
[8] -1 0 0xf4003000 - 0xf4003fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[9] -1 0 0xf4002000 - 0xf4002fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[10] -1 0 0xf4001000 - 0xf4001fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[11] -1 0 0xf4000000 - 0xf4000fff (0x1000) MX[b]
[12] -1 0 0xf5000000 - 0xf5ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[13] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xefffffff (0x10000000) MX[b](B)
[14] -1 0 0xf6000000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x1000000) MX[b](B)
[15] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[b](OprD)
[16] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[b](OprD)
[17] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[b](OprD)
[18] 0 0 0x00002000 - 0x0000207f (0x80) IX[b]
[19] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[b]
[20] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[b]
[21] -1 0 0x00001800 - 0x000018ff (0x100) IX[b]
[22] -1 0 0x00001c00 - 0x00001c7f (0x80) IX[b]
[23] -1 0 0x00001c90 - 0x00001c9f (0x10) IX[b]
[24] -1 0 0x00001ca0 - 0x00001ca3 (0x4) IX[b]
[25] -1 0 0x00001ca8 - 0x00001caf (0x8) IX[b]
[26] -1 0 0x00001ca4 - 0x00001ca7 (0x4) IX[b]
[27] -1 0 0x00001cb0 - 0x00001cb7 (0x8) IX[b]
[28] -1 0 0x00001000 - 0x0000107f (0x80) IX[b]
[29] -1 0 0x00001400 - 0x000014ff (0x100) IX[b]
[30] -1 0 0x00001c80 - 0x00001c8f (0x10) IX[b]
[31] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[32] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[33] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f0 (0x1) IX[b]
[34] -1 0 0x000001f0 - 0x000001f7 (0x8) IX[b]
[35] -1 0 0x00002000 - 0x0000207f (0x80) IX[b](B)
[36] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[b](OprU)
[37] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[b](OprU)

Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x6d) [0x4802ed]
1: /lib/libc.so.6 [0x2b3ad1538110]
2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so(_nv001058X+0x36) [0x2b3ad32aa7d6]

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-07, 05:42 PM   #7
whig
550Ti
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 854
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

Resource ranges may not be memory ranges; the X log on my 64 bit install has debug info output just like the above.
whig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-07, 03:02 AM   #8
gilboa
Linux addict...
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 540
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

A. What's the output the dmesg once you load the nvidia kernel module?
B. As root, execute nvidia-bug-report.sh and attach the output.

- Gilboa
__________________
DEV-NG: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX680, F19/x86_64, Dell U2711.
DEV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 5x320GB, GTX550, F19/x86_64, Dell U2711 (^).
SRV: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 4x2TB, 9800GTX, F19/x86-64, Dell U2412.
LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F19/x86_64.
gilboa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-07, 02:08 AM   #9
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

First the output of the new beta driver:

[103862.073128] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:01:00.0 to 64
[103862.073237] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 100.14.03 Wed Apr 4 23:18:53 PDT 2007
[103921.075350] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:01:00.0 to 64
[103921.075476] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 100.14.03 Wed Apr 4 23:18:53 PDT 2007
(after starting X)
[103951.217439] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE0000 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
[103951.602840] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE001e 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
[103954.100429] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE0000 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
[103954.764370] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE001e 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
[103957.250704] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE0000 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
[103957.632883] NVRM: Xid (0001:00): 6, PE001e 0000 80000010 00000000 ffffffff 00000000



and the last lines of xorg.log:

Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x6d) [0x4802ed]
1: /lib/libc.so.6 [0x2abf2e502110]
2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so(_nv001058X+0x36) [0x2abf302747d6]

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
Attached Files
File Type: log nvidia-bug-report.log (109.7 KB, 89 views)
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-07, 02:15 AM   #10
whig
550Ti
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 854
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

Normally loading dri causes glx to fail, but you get a segfault or something. Better remove this line from xorg.conf anyway.
Code:
	Load	"dri"
whig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-07, 02:21 AM   #11
guwi17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Lightbulb Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

now the output of the 9755 driver:

[104449.273203] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:01:00.0 to 64
[104449.273365] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 1.0-9755 Mon Feb 26 23:16:31 PST 2007
[104464.967696] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:01:00.0 to 64
[104464.967977] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 1.0-9755 Mon Feb 26 23:16:31 PST 2007

...

I finally got this driver running!

I had to manually remove libGL and libglx from /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions and reinstall the driver.

I'll check the 3D caps tomorrow, because I don't have physical access to this machine today.
guwi17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-07, 08:26 AM   #12
jariy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: 1.0-9755 for Linux x86-64 fails with 4GB of RAM

I'm having the same kind of problems. When I start X both of my screens go to power saving mode and obviusly I can't do anyting. System doesn't freeze completely since I can reboot it by hitting ctrl-alt-del.

I can get rid of the problem by disabling memory hole on my bios, but then I also lose 1GB of memory, which isn't nice thing.

I tried to remove libg* from /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions and reinstall the drivers but it had no effect.

I'll attach the bug report log here too.
Attached Files
File Type: log nvidia-bug-report.log (123.7 KB, 81 views)
jariy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.