Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux

Newegg Daily Deals

View Poll Results: Are you satisfied with nvidia linux support?
Yes 55 56.12%
No 43 43.88%
Voters: 98. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-30-07, 11:34 AM   #1
kriko
openSuSE11
 
kriko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe, Slovenia, Koper
Posts: 515
Default Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

netllama gave me this idea, so I'm opening this thread to discuss opinions on nvidia.

What is bothering me is the almost "fully" closed development of new drivers. You don't know which bugs are going to be fixed in future release, when are they going to be fixed or if they are assigned to be fixed at all.
So I'm proposing an open bug-tracking system, where customers would report bugs, see their priority and progress.

Next thing is moderation on this forums. Why netllama closed this popular thread:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...72#post1271572
of course it was a bit offtopic, and it bring a bit of shame on nvidia, but why not instead clean it a bit (delete or move to a new thread offtopic posts)?
As you can see, we were trying to find a way around a problem, so you can't just close it.

Thats it for now. Please leave your comments, or ideas on improvements. Maybe someday the'll become reality.

EDIT: added poll
kriko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 11:56 AM   #2
evilghost
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,606
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Compared with the alternatives, such as ATI, yes I'm quite satisfied. It's also nice to be able to directly interface with NVidia employees though this forum.
evilghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 12:19 PM   #3
Ulayo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Closed source doesn't bother me much. I just wish they'd put down more time to fix issues and performance.
Ulayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 01:50 PM   #4
kriko
openSuSE11
 
kriko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe, Slovenia, Koper
Posts: 515
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

evilghost: yes, compared to alternatives is much better, but it could be even better than it is. I pointed out some ideas, if someone else got them, bring them. Maybe nvidia will listen.

@mods: Why was this thread closed for some moments?
kriko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 01:50 PM   #5
Sylvain59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: France
Posts: 9
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

I say Yes, but there are still some things to improve.

I can understand that open sourcing the drivers is not possible due to patents. But perhaps it is possible to give no-patented informations which are sufficient to develop open source drivers from scratch.

People could have the choice between open source drivers which are perhaps less buggy due to less complexity, and proprietary drivers giving better performance.
Sylvain59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 01:56 PM   #6
jeisom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: My own little world
Posts: 117
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Not really one way or the other. I'd like to see improvement to video accel though. but compared to the alternative currently available i lean to satisfied
jeisom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 01:58 PM   #7
gfxdrone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 74
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

satisfied/dissatisfied is far too black and white. Is nVidia driver support better than something that doesn't even exist, ATI support? Of course, but that's not saying anything meaningful.

Do nVidia drivers work better than the current crop of ATI drivers? Since ATI currently doesn't even have a single driver that works with xorg 1.3 type identifying xorg, again, no question, nvidia is doing the job very well, and continues to do a very good job.

But after that it gets far less black and white. Personally, after reading these forums for a while, I see the entire project of trying to provide working non-free, binary blob drivers for the linux kernel as doomed to fail long term.

And the issues like nvidia drivers requiring reinstalls after every xorg update also point to problem areas, in this case conflicts with the packaging systems of the distro, debian and all its derivatives, for instance.

Then the inability to function with things like paravirt_ops, without doing gpl violating hacks, again, not a recipe for long term success. In this case, for example, we have to release new kernels with less than full features enabled to allow them to work with nvidia drivers.

So I really don't envy nVidia employees at all, they are faced with what is really not a realistic long term task, but they can't do anything about it, since the decision to open the drivers is not their's to make, so they have to deal with what they can handle on their end. And in that limited field, they do a very good job.

But the moment that AMD/ATI comes out with an open driver, if they actually do follow through on their hint that they might do that, nvidia will fast lose all relevance in the Linux market place. Already, for non-gamers, choosing a Intel mobo based video chipset, for it's free/open driver xorg support is becoming a no brainer if you can find an adequate system re price/performance/features. The binary blob driver is not going to survive as a Linux kernel business model long term, there's almost no question about that in my opinion.

But for now, nobody comes close to nVidia in the current Linux kernel non-free binary blob driver marketplace, their drivers continue to 'just work', release after release, they are easy to handle, they do not fail for our users, and they cause me almost zero headaches, month after month, and for that I really have to say a big thanks, with the above qualifications.

(I didn't vote, because I can't say I either am or am not satisfied, some things are good, some aren't, so to vote satisfied would ignore the problems, and to vote dissatisfied would fail to give credit for the good work nvidia does do on an ongoing basis.)
gfxdrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 04:48 PM   #8
TPG
Unregistered User
 
TPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 203
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Honestly i don't care whether drivers are opensourced or not, till they work perfectly.

I'm fully satisfied with _current_ nvidia support for *NIX
__________________
mandriva > all
kthnxbai
TPG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-30-07, 04:50 PM   #9
mehukatti
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Despite of my recent problems with integrated GeForce 6150, I have been satisfied with NVidia's drivers. Yes some people have problems, but I think one has to remember that most people only post onto this board when they have some kind of a problem. Atleast this is why I registered here in the first place. Of course a more open development model would be nicer, but atleast they are fixing bugs even now.
mehukatti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 06:20 PM   #10
m-singh
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 40
Thumbs down Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Nvidia deserves the linux community's thanks for being the first major graphics chip maker to provide linux drivers. That has won nvidia an immense amount of goodwill.

However, you cannot ride on goodwill alone forever. There has to be performance to match the growing numbers and needs of the linux community.

The persistent bug with nvidia's drivers on certain chipsets in laptops which borks hibernate (or for some people, suspend to RAM) is a case in the point. Many nvidia bug reports have been filed, every scrap of information asked for has been provided, but stable/beta versions come and go and this bug remains unfixed (upwards of 6 months at this point in time).

Nvidia owns the IP on its drivers and has a perfectly legitimate right to do whatever it wishes with them. However, if it wants linux users to invest in nvidia hardware on new machines, it has to demonstrate either of the following three :

1. Fix the bugs in time (yes - it takes a week or two to track it down, but 6 months ?? - this might be passe in the windows world, but it is extremely extremely rare for bugs to survive this long in well-supported Linux OS/applications) and keep the drivers closed source.
2. Open the specs of the chipsets so that people (such as the authors of nv) can add 3D support etc. I would like to mention that the particular bug I mentioned does not occur with nv drivers.
3. Open source the nvidia drivers themselves, so that bugs are hunted down and fixed ASAP.

Its not our place to dictate what nvidia should do. We neither have the right nor perhaps the legal knowhow to do that. However, the picture of closed source drivers that go months with unfixed bugs is not a pretty one. Earlier today, I had to make a purchase decision for two laptops for some of the new people in our group. I specifically chose intel 9xx cards for them (and this is when one of them is a windows user, where the windows version of the driver probably does not have the bug - just what happens when you piss off your fans) because I cannot in good conscience inflict the kind of experience I have had over the past few months on some other people.

I would like to propose that a clean set of drivers (open source or closed or even competing (option 2 above)) with a process that quickly fixes those bugs would do a lot to attract and retain linux users. How Nvidia arrives at that sound business decision is Nvidia's call. My job is only to provide customer feedback as I see it.
m-singh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 07:20 PM   #11
lloeki
Arch Linux
 
lloeki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 122
Default Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

yes, satisfied, as critical issues were fixed for me. but there's room for improvement. out of the blue, maybe there's:
- a lack of manpower
- an inefficient/inappropriate workflow
- an improvable involvement of the community

closed source doesn't bother me, as long as I have long term, reactive, efficient support, but as of now, to me we're only half-way there.
lloeki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-07, 07:23 PM   #12
zbiggy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 623
Thumbs up Re: Satisfaction / dissatisfaction with nvidia

Nvidia has the best GPU driver for Linux. The most feature rich and fast developed. The support for new geforces is added really faster than before.
The tech support here is great. In comparison ATI support is none and new radeons add to driver can take months to years.

Nvidia should have public bugzilla. It will save developers time: users will add comments to existing bugs instead of making new threads again and again.

Another bugzilla should be made for website related things - the place to report wrong files, old links, outdated information etc. The nvidia ftp server needs some cleanup and "nvidia driver download beta" application needs some fine tuning for Linux users. There is no webmaster e-mail address on nvidia.com so there is no possibility to leave Nvidia a hint on these issues.
zbiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 Ferianto85 NVIDIA Linux 0 05-18-12 09:35 PM
Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability ViN86 Rumor Mill 6 05-09-12 05:48 PM
rh7.3 and nvidia vcrispo NVIDIA Linux 11 07-31-02 09:57 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.