|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
As of now, AMD own's the low end. If they can just bring that success up to the mainstream things will start looking up for them. Their Brisbane 3600 is a killer deal, and overclocks equally as well as a Core2 for the most part. 1200Mhz oc on air is quite common for that chip. AMD has something pretty awesome with Brisbane. Let's hope they can improve upon it enough with Barcelona and Agena to compete better. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
how do you compete against a $266 quad core that is close to your current (probably $500-600) quad core?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
My comment was directed at the near future products. Barcelona, Agena, and the GPU+CPU ordeal. Furthermore, if AMD does not manage to bring any really competitive products to the table, and IBM does buy them up- I'm extatic about what that would mean competition wise. With the resources IBM has available to it, IBM could buy up AMD, Intel, and nVidia. So, imagine if that was all behind AMD to compete with both Intel and nVidia. The fierce competition that would result is like a dream come true. ![]() Putting that thought aside, I do agree that right now AMD is hurting. But I'm confident that they'll release something positive with barcelona and Agena. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Prague
Posts: 749
|
IBM buying AMD? That cannot happen, but would be marvellous. IBM has its (megacore) G5 CPU as well, why should it buy AMD? No reason at all.. Plus they sold all their x86 business to Lenovo some time ago.
I am tired of AMD and ATI, they suck, cannot bring products to the market, and if they do, they suck even more (because they cannot lie about performance anymore). If CPU performance is good, chipsets suck. But IBM would have my trust :-)
__________________
[size=1][b]CPU:[/b] Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2GHz | [b]Memory:[/b] 4x2GB Patriot DDR2-800 | 4GB A-Data PD7 ReadyBoost USB | [b]Sound:[/b] X-Fi FPS [b]Board:[/b] Asus Commando | [b]GPU: 8800GTX @ 650/1050[/b] | [b]HDD:[/b] 3x WD3200KS 320GB + 500GB | [b]Power:[/b] Fortron EPSILON 600W-GLN [b]Mouse:[/b] Logitech G5 | [b]Kbd:[/b] Logitech G15 | [b]DVD:[/b] Plextor 130B + LITE-ON LH-18A1H | [b]LCD[/b] [b]24" HP2465 1920x1200[/b] | Vista Ultimate x64 My websites: [url=http://hulan.cz/en][b]HULAN.cz[/b][/url], [url=http://radekhulan.cz/][b]RADEKHULAN.cz[/b][/url], [url=http://hulan.info/][b]HULAN.info[/b][/url], [url=http://blogcms.com/][b]BLOGCMS.com[/b][/url], [url=http://www.megablog.cz/][b]MEGABLOG.cz[/b][/url] | [url=http://hulan.cz/temp/games.png][b]Games played[/b][/url] | [URL=http://hulan.cz/temp/sestava.png][B]CPU-Z[/B][/URL] -- [URL="http://radekhulan.cz/img/stacker-830/stacker-830-bocnice.jpg"][B]case foto[/B][/URL][/size] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Quote:
Look at the 1900XT, it is currently doing circles around the 7900GTX in newer titles. I'm hoping that just as ATi was looking to the future with the 1900 they were doing the same with the 2900. We wont know till the cards are tested in a native DX10 and USA environment. As to the CPU... again we wont know for some time still. As to IBM not buying out AMD... of course their past actions would make that seem unlikely- you'd be led to think that IBM would have no interest in AMD. Then again, nobody really thought AMD would buy ATi. AMD merging with nVidia seemed more likely at that time. We were surprised then, we could be surprised again. I would also love it if IBM bought AMD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
|
IMO... what Intel is doing is a smart thing. They have been dominating against AMD and they know AMD hasn't had much coming out that beens that great, not to mention AMD still hasn't come out with their new line-up. By cutting prices, its making more ppl go with 775 and Intel... not to mention. Quad Core
more mainstream and affordable. Also with Penryn and 45nm quads which seem to dominate Barcelona, Why not make it known u have the best tech. out there, especially for the best price. AMD is going to have an extremely tough time cutting prices to keep up with Intel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Mister Anderson ... !!!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,785
|
Anybody knows if the new C2Ds gonna still use s775?
Maybe I gonna buy such a quad later on for my 680i
__________________
- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + Zalman 9700 LED - MSI P6N (Nvidia 680i chipset), BIOS: P33 - 2GB DDR2 ram Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz - MSI Geforce 8800GTS 640MB - Creative X-Fi Elite Pro - Seagate 320GB 7200/10 - WD Caviar 750GB - Logitech MX-518 - Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit NL 3D mark 05: 13321 3D Mark 06: 8065 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
o(^3^)o
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
__________________
Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4 - Core i7 860 2.8 GHz - 4GB PC10666 RAM - Samsung F1 1TB drive - 18x DVD RW - GeForce GTS 250 512MB (to be replaced) - Corsair HX750 - LianLi PC2110B case - Windows 7 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Mister Anderson ... !!!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,785
|
thx for reply
__________________
- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + Zalman 9700 LED - MSI P6N (Nvidia 680i chipset), BIOS: P33 - 2GB DDR2 ram Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz - MSI Geforce 8800GTS 640MB - Creative X-Fi Elite Pro - Seagate 320GB 7200/10 - WD Caviar 750GB - Logitech MX-518 - Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit NL 3D mark 05: 13321 3D Mark 06: 8065 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
GTX 285 SSC Goodness!
|
I dont think the new 1333FSB will overclock any better than the current. Most current C2D's reach 1333FSB with almost no trouble and many go MUCH higher with some voltage and a good HSF.
__________________
Intel® Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.51GHz (390 x 9 / 1.39v) | ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP LGA 775 Intel P965 (1236 BIOS) | OCZ GOLD 4GB (2GB x 2) DDR2 PC2-8500 Dual Channel (4-4-4-12 780Mhz/1.95V 1:1 Ratio) | EVGA GeForce GTX 285 SSC Edition 1GB 512-bit GDDR3 (Currently @ 720MHz Core / 2750MHz Memory) | Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS | Zalman CNPS9700 LED Ultra Quiet CPU Cooler | 5 Western Digital 500GB SATA II 7200RPM w/32MB Buffer | Acer X241W 24in Widescreen LCD 1920 x 1200 32bit | Samsung DVD-RW-DL 18x Burner w/ lightscribe| SILVERSTONE OP650 ATX12V / EPS12V 650W Power Supply | AOpen 5.1 Surround sound system | Windows Vista Business 64-Bit 3dMarkVantage: P16103 3dMark06: 17606 SuperPi 1M: 14s 100% Orthos Stable! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 2,371
|
Quote:
The a64 dominated the Intel chips for 3-4 years with nothing coming close in terms of performance, their chipsets are just as stable as Intel and almost always have more features. The 1900XT mopped the floor with the 7 series as well...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
And which chipsets do you mean? AMD uses a few.... |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|