Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Home Theater A/V

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-04-07, 05:37 PM   #1
Jon
Registered User
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 560
Default Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

So, I have my PC connected via dvi to the hdtv. Currently audio is handled using the 3.5mm analog connection from the x-fi to the 3.5mm pc input on the tv. I want some 5.1 speakers because I don't like the built in HDTV speakers.

I just want the simplest/most likely to work method. I believe I need to connect either the 3.5mm digital flexijack or the 3x3.5mm analogues to a dolby decoder/receiver.

But I can't decide if its a decoder or a receiver I need (most articles I read appear to use these names interchangeably). I thought the x-fi had a built in decoder but I don't even have the decoder tab in audio console which is clearly shown on creatives website:

http://soundblaster.com/Applications...&categoryID=14

I also read that if you use the analogue connectors, the x-fi automatically does the decoding... does this mean if I go analogue I can't use a decoder?

Can anyone help?
__________________
Intel i5-2500K (4Ghz)|2 x Nvidia 560GTX TI (880/2100mhz)|Crucial M4 SSD
12GB GSkill PC3-12800 (1600Mhz 9-9-9-24)|Thermaltake Tough Power 700w|Razer Megalodon 7.1 Headset
BENQ XL2410T 24" 3D Monitor
Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-07, 04:07 AM   #2
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

It's best if you use a straight digital connection IMO. Not only do you completely avoid noise caused by EM interference from other devices in your PC (and PC's do have a lot of EM noise compared to pretty much any other audio source) you also avoid the crosstalk problems that are present in the 3.5mm headphone style cables that PC soundcards typically use.

Creative is the one brand of sound cards that doesn't offer much in the way of digital audio though. You can get good sound out of e.g. DVD's by using the S/PDIF passthrough feature connected to your a/v receiver, but you are SOL when it comes to games.

If you must have an x-fi (not really the best audio chipset IMO,) then the only way you'll get digital audio is by switching to the Auzentech Prelude when that comes out.
__________________
Want to listen to audio without your computer going to sleep? Try this.

Core i7 2600k 4.4Ghz 1.385v | Corsair H60 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 8-8-8-24 | MSI P67A-G45 | OCZ Vertex 3 | Sapphire 7850 OC to Max settings

Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 02:48 AM   #3
Bman212121
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon
So, I have my PC connected via dvi to the hdtv. Currently audio is handled using the 3.5mm analog connection from the x-fi to the 3.5mm pc input on the tv. I want some 5.1 speakers because I don't like the built in HDTV speakers.

I just want the simplest/most likely to work method. I believe I need to connect either the 3.5mm digital flexijack or the 3x3.5mm analogues to a dolby decoder/receiver.

But I can't decide if its a decoder or a receiver I need (most articles I read appear to use these names interchangeably). I thought the x-fi had a built in decoder but I don't even have the decoder tab in audio console which is clearly shown on creatives website:

http://soundblaster.com/Applications...&categoryID=14

I also read that if you use the analogue connectors, the x-fi automatically does the decoding... does this mean if I go analogue I can't use a decoder?

Can anyone help?
The thing is that most recievers have a decoder in them. They are two seperate things, but a decoder is usually a piece of hardware built into the reciever itself. You don't need to use the decoder that is in your reciever to input audio, it is only needed if you are putting in something that wasn't already decoded.

The X-FI has a built in decoder, and you don't really have to set anything to turn it on because it automatically decodes everthing by default. You can use the analog connections (3 x 3.5mm) to your reciever if you have the correct inputs on reciever itself. (Meaning 3 x 3.5 jacks or 3 pairs of RCA's) The easiest way is simply by using an optical cable (digital connection) from the X-FI to the reciever. That will give you 5.1 audio using one cable.
Bman212121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 08:41 AM   #4
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bman212121
That will give you 5.1 audio using one cable.
Only on a pre-encoded signal though. Like if you set your sound card to pass through AC3 streams when playing DVDs.

In games (and everything else) you'd get only stereo from an X-FI using any kind of digital connection.
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 03:05 PM   #5
Redeemed
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,982
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptNKILL
Only on a pre-encoded signal though. Like if you set your sound card to pass through AC3 streams when playing DVDs.

In games (and everything else) you'd get only stereo from an X-FI using any kind of digital connection.
Incorrect, if I interpretted his post correctly. You would get db ProLogic surround. You could get this with analog cables as well, but the signal is far cleaner if he went digital.

Then again, maybe I'm misunderstanding his post entirely.
Redeemed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 04:00 PM   #6
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeemed
Incorrect, if I interpretted his post correctly. You would get db ProLogic surround. You could get this with analog cables as well, but the signal is far cleaner if he went digital.
Well prologic isn't going to get you discrete surround. Prologic converts any stereo source into surround by using "natural cues" (as how dolby describes it) to make some sounds come from the rear channels.

This is OK for DVD's and music, especially if they are specifically mastered for prologic usage, but you aren't going to get anywhere near the same effect in games that you'd get from discrete audio channels.
__________________
Want to listen to audio without your computer going to sleep? Try this.

Core i7 2600k 4.4Ghz 1.385v | Corsair H60 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 8-8-8-24 | MSI P67A-G45 | OCZ Vertex 3 | Sapphire 7850 OC to Max settings

Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 05:23 PM   #7
Redeemed
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,982
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaWolf_HK
Well prologic isn't going to get you discrete surround. Prologic converts any stereo source into surround by using "natural cues" (as how dolby describes it) to make some sounds come from the rear channels.

This is OK for DVD's and music, especially if they are specifically mastered for prologic usage, but you aren't going to get anywhere near the same effect in games that you'd get from discrete audio channels.
I am aware of this. ProLogic is no where near as accurate as discrete surround- but with games I'm not sure there is really such a thing as "discrete surround". I guess anologue 5.1 might come close... but it is still a far cry from DD or DTS we get with our movies.

For gaming, if surround is your primary focus, I've found that the anologue 5.1 out seems to work very well in most games- and for the ones it doesn't work well with there is ProLogic. Aside from EAX and what I've mentioned, there isn't much else one could do to get great surround in games. And even with EAX you need a game that actually takes advantage of EAX Advanced HD to be impressed- where as the 5.1 anologue route or ProLogic requires no real compatibility from the games' end.
Redeemed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-07, 10:20 PM   #8
Bman212121
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeemed
Incorrect, if I interpretted his post correctly. You would get db ProLogic surround. You could get this with analog cables as well, but the signal is far cleaner if he went digital.

Then again, maybe I'm misunderstanding his post entirely.
Nope you read it right buddy. I was trying to avoid saying discrete and pro logic surround cause I couldn't remember what the deal was with using the digital versus using the analog. I know that when you are using the digital from your X-FI to say my Z5500's there is some form of 5.1 channel sound going on because if it were only 2 channel than the front and rear would sound the same, and the center wouldn't do anything.
Bman212121 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-07, 11:45 PM   #9
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeemed
I am aware of this. ProLogic is no where near as accurate as discrete surround- but with games I'm not sure there is really such a thing as "discrete surround". I guess anologue 5.1 might come close... but it is still a far cry from DD or DTS we get with our movies.

For gaming, if surround is your primary focus, I've found that the anologue 5.1 out seems to work very well in most games- and for the ones it doesn't work well with there is ProLogic. Aside from EAX and what I've mentioned, there isn't much else one could do to get great surround in games. And even with EAX you need a game that actually takes advantage of EAX Advanced HD to be impressed- where as the 5.1 anologue route or ProLogic requires no real compatibility from the games' end.
Correct, except for the games and EAX part. Games are with very few rare exceptions entirely discrete audio. Sound in games consists of just numerous mono sound clips, and those clips are mixed into the individual channels in real-time.

Many game engines only do this with two channel support built into the engine. Most that don't use directsound to process this, the game just tells directsound where the individual sound effect is coming from relative to the "listener," and then directsound automatically takes care of the channel mixing. The same is done with surround as well, with directsound3d. Both directsound and directsound3d use discrete audio; that is they can send completely different audio to each different speaker if desired.

EAX actually has nothing to do with surround processing (aka positional audio) at all. EAX, meaning Environmental Audio eXtensions, is literally just a proprietary set of extensions for directsound3d (and optionally, OpenAL) which add various types of effects (e.g. reverb, echo, chorus, envelope, etc) to a given sample to give it an effect to make it sound like a different "environment" (e.g. hallway, stadium, etc.) EAX AdvancedHD extends EAX a little further by being able to apply multiple effects to a given sound sample, as well as add transitional effects to a sample which e.g. comes from a different type of room than the listener is currently standing in.

With regular directsound3d, in say for example the arena in Oblivion, you can hear those footsteps coming at you from whichever direction, be it front or rear. With EAX extensions, it can sound more like you are actually inside of the arena instead of just your room because of the echo effects that are added. With EAX AdvancedHD, this would sound the same as regular EAX unless you were down in that hallway before you set foot into the arena, and heard something moving in the arena, in which case you'll hear sounds coming from the arena into the hallway where you are standing. Without AdvancedHD you just hear the sounds as if they were from far away in the hallway, with no "distant arena" effect added in. (I don't know if Oblivion uses EAX BTW, this is just a hypothetical example.)

Also the differences between eax 1.0 through 5.0 (aside from AdvancedHD being added in 3.0) are only changes in the maximum number of audio samples that can be processed at a given time.

(and off topic a bit, FWIW, vista doesn't remove eax nor directsound3d as many fud spreaders claim, it just removes HAL support which tends to be buggy, and this made creative freak out because now their marketing team has to change its tactics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bman212121
I know that when you are using the digital from your X-FI to say my Z5500's there is some form of 5.1 channel sound going on because if it were only 2 channel than the front and rear would sound the same, and the center wouldn't do anything.
This is actually a function of the z5500, and not your sound card. Your sound card is only sending stereo (e.g. left and right) audio, and isn't applying any kind of effects to it to make the z5500 interpret it differently. The z5500 takes that audio and mostly duplicates what is heard on e.g. the left channel to the left surround channel, the right channel to the right surround channel, blends together the left and right speakers for the center channel, and sends the low frequency sounds to the subwoofer. It then makes some sounds more pronounced from the rear or the front, but it is somewhat random(ish.) But say the game makes an effect that is supposed to come from the right rear channel for example, you generally won't really hear it coming from the right rear, just somewhat on your right side.

Remember that prologic is designed for a cinematic experience. Even with discrete 5.1 audio, movies are supposed to (or at least are intended to, with some exceptions) give you most of the sound from the front, and the surround is only to add ambiance, and not distract from what you are seeing on the screen. For games, prologic is only going to provide just that: ambiance.

Games have a bit of a different approach for surround though. Games, at least FPS games anyways, are supposed to give you the impression that you are actually there.

Think of it like this: In movies, if you are watching two people speak at a restaurant, and behind the "fourth wall" there are some dishes rattling and a waiter speaking. That is just kind of a side effect that adds to the feel of being in the restaurant. You aren't really supposed to be able to make out what the waiter in the background is saying, as that is more of a distraction from the focus of the camera.

In the game however, you should be able to hear the waiter speaking on the other hand, because you aren't just supposed to feel like you are in the restaurant: you are supposed to be in the restaurant, and furthermore you control the camera, so the focus goes wherever you want it to go as you more or less have more control over what is going on in the story, and there really is no "fourth wall." You can't really get this out of prologic, but you can get this out of discrete audio on the other hand.

For this reason, if you are going to combine any creative card with any 5.1 speaker setup, and you intend on primarily using that setup for games, then I would highly recommend using the analog connections and not digital. With that setup, you should use digital for music and movies only. Don't bother with that analog to DTS converter box that creative sells either, as that won't get you anywhere, and really isn't useful for anything IMO.
__________________
Want to listen to audio without your computer going to sleep? Try this.

Core i7 2600k 4.4Ghz 1.385v | Corsair H60 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 8-8-8-24 | MSI P67A-G45 | OCZ Vertex 3 | Sapphire 7850 OC to Max settings

Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-07, 01:45 AM   #10
crainger
 
crainger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia
Posts: 29,559
Send a message via AIM to crainger
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Here we go again.
crainger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-07, 02:09 AM   #11
Rakeesh
 
Rakeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by crainger
Here we go again.
What?
__________________
Want to listen to audio without your computer going to sleep? Try this.

Core i7 2600k 4.4Ghz 1.385v | Corsair H60 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 8-8-8-24 | MSI P67A-G45 | OCZ Vertex 3 | Sapphire 7850 OC to Max settings

Rakeesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-07, 03:42 AM   #12
Redeemed
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,982
Default Re: Really confused! What home cinema speakers do I need for x-fi?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaWolf_HK
Correct, except for the games and EAX part. Games are with very few rare exceptions entirely discrete audio. Sound in games consists of just numerous mono sound clips, and those clips are mixed into the individual channels in real-time.

Many game engines only do this with two channel support built into the engine. Most that don't use directsound to process this, the game just tells directsound where the individual sound effect is coming from relative to the "listener," and then directsound automatically takes care of the channel mixing. The same is done with surround as well, with directsound3d. Both directsound and directsound3d use discrete audio; that is they can send completely different audio to each different speaker if desired.

EAX actually has nothing to do with surround processing (aka positional audio) at all. EAX, meaning Environmental Audio eXtensions, is literally just a proprietary set of extensions for directsound3d (and optionally, OpenAL) which add various types of effects (e.g. reverb, echo, chorus, envelope, etc) to a given sample to give it an effect to make it sound like a different "environment" (e.g. hallway, stadium, etc.) EAX AdvancedHD extends EAX a little further by being able to apply multiple effects to a given sound sample, as well as add transitional effects to a sample which e.g. comes from a different type of room than the listener is currently standing in.

With regular directsound3d, in say for example the arena in Oblivion, you can hear those footsteps coming at you from whichever direction, be it front or rear. With EAX extensions, it can sound more like you are actually inside of the arena instead of just your room because of the echo effects that are added. With EAX AdvancedHD, this would sound the same as regular EAX unless you were down in that hallway before you set foot into the arena, and heard something moving in the arena, in which case you'll hear sounds coming from the arena into the hallway where you are standing. Without AdvancedHD you just hear the sounds as if they were from far away in the hallway, with no "distant arena" effect added in. (I don't know if Oblivion uses EAX BTW, this is just a hypothetical example.)

Also the differences between eax 1.0 through 5.0 (aside from AdvancedHD being added in 3.0) are only changes in the maximum number of audio samples that can be processed at a given time.

(and off topic a bit, FWIW, vista doesn't remove eax nor directsound3d as many fud spreaders claim, it just removes HAL support which tends to be buggy, and this made creative freak out because now their marketing team has to change its tactics)
I'm well aware that EAX is not a form of surround sound by any means, but Creative does want their customers to think otherwise- and that is more or less why I even mentioned it:

http://us.creative.com/products/prod...&product=16559

Quote:
Turn stereo music and movies into surround sound
X-Fi CMSS-3D technology expands your stereo MP3s and digital movies into surround sound over multichannel speakers, stereo speakers or even headphones. Voices are centered in front of you and ambient sounds are moved all around you.
Also, notice to the right on that page, the Alchemy ad- it says "Get Surround Sound Back".

But yes, I am aware of and agree with everything you said. It is just with CL's marketing most people are unaware that EAX is not actually surround sound. Again, that is the only reason why I mentioned it.
Redeemed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Launches, Keeps Us Up At Night News Archived News Items 0 06-02-12 04:10 AM
Personal Cinema not working on GeForce4 Ti 4600 MacGyver0013 NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series 5 02-09-03 12:54 AM
A good set of speakers? Creole General Hardware 7 09-20-02 12:24 AM
Confused Philibob Feedback Forum 3 09-12-02 04:19 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.